Think Forward.

Une fois n'est pas coutume, proposition d'un Conseil National du Sport par le PJD... 3825

Une fois n'est pas coutume, le billet de ce dimanche 6 avril 2025 traite du sport. Je n'aime pas trop en parler. C'est paradoxal mais c'est ainsi. Plus d'un sont persuadés qu'il est très difficile de faire bouger les choses, tant la médiocrité est enracinée, les bonnes volontés chahutées, les compétences indésirables, le dévouement n'ayant pas droit de cité et l'honnêteté perçue comme douteuse. L'occasion ici m'est donnée par deux partis politiques, car une fois n'est pas coutume, en l'espace d'une semaine, les deux partis – le PJD et le FFD – se sont intéressés au sport. J'ai trouvé cela très intéressant, car habituellement les partis ne traitent du sujet qu'à la suite de résultats jugés inacceptables. Alors, succombant à l'émotion, ils en profitent pour interpeller le gouvernement et, pendant quelque temps, montent au créneau, malmenant le ministre responsable et incriminant les fédérations. Ce fut le cas tout dernièrement suite aux résultats décevants aux JO de Paris. Ensuite, silence radio. Lors de la préparation des programmes de campagnes électorales, certains, plutôt rares, vont mentionner le sport dans de simples narratifs généralement vides de sens ; histoire de dire que c'est important, sans préciser ni pourquoi ni comment ils comptent l'aborder une fois au parlement ou au gouvernement. Cela se traduit très vite par un manque de vision dans les déclarations d'investiture des premiers ministres, puis maintenant des chefs de gouvernement. On se contente de quelques phrases puisées çà ou là pour dire que le sport n'est pas oublié. De mémoire, je puis citer tout de même quelques exceptions qui confirment la règle. L'Ittihad Addoustouri, dans son programme à sa création, avait réservé un bon chapitre au sport. J'avais amplement contribué à cela. L'USFP, à l'aune des dernières élections, m'avait aussi convié à une réflexion ayant servi de base au programme du parti. Je me rappelle aussi avoir participé à un travail similaire, il y a longtemps, avec l'Istiqlal sous l'impulsion de Si Belmahi, vaillant président de la FRM de cyclisme. Cette fois-ci, c'est le PJD qui monte au créneau en déposant, selon la presse, un projet de loi portant sur la création d'un Conseil National des sports en lieu et place du département responsable aujourd'hui, à savoir la minuscule direction des sports en queue de responsabilité du Ministère de l'éducation nationale, du préscolaire et du sport. L'architecture du Gouvernement de Si Akhanouch et sa version revisitée continue d'étonner, réduisant le sport à une simple direction sans relief parmi les prérogatives d'un ministère enlisé dans des réformes à n'en plus finir, sans pour autant que l'on perçoive le bout du tunnel. Depuis l'indépendance, l'éducation nationale est en perpétuelle réforme. La dernière en date remonte tout fraîchement à la semaine dernière. Gageons que ce n'est pas la dernière. Depuis ce rattachement, les deux derniers ministres en responsabilité paraissent ne pas avoir eu de temps pour le sport. Le PJD donc est venu audacieusement avec ce projet, qui en fait n'est pas nouveau. Les premières assises du sport au début des années soixante l'avaient déjà évoqué. Depuis, le sport a connu au moins 14 ou 15 soubresauts, passant de département indépendant au rattachement à la jeunesse, à l'éducation nationale, en passant par un secrétariat rattaché au premier ministre. Il fut même rattaché au travail, du temps de feu Arsalane El Jadidi. Vaille que vaille, le sport fera son petit bonhomme de chemin avec plus ou moins de réussites, mais surtout des échecs répétitifs. La seule fois où il a connu un peu de stabilité fut du temps de feu Abdellatif Semlali, qui détient toujours le record de longévité comme responsable du sport. Son mandat comme secrétaire d'État puis comme ministre dura onze bonnes années. On parlait alors de décollage sportif. Ce fut une période relativement heureuse qui vit une restructuration du champ sportif avec notamment le parrainage, le second tour en Coupe du monde, la création de l'école nationale d'athlétisme, les premières médailles olympiques et un regain de jouvence dans plus d'une discipline sportive. Le PJD, qui a dirigé le gouvernement, ne s'est-il pas rendu compte du malaise que vit le sport pendant ses dix années de gloire ? Tant mieux qu'il le fasse maintenant. Passer à une administration de mission et une gestion qui échappe au temps politique est une nécessité. C'est une revendication évidente portée par de nombreux spécialistes depuis très longtemps, sans que le monde politique ne lui donne suite. Le temps sportif est plus long que le temps politique. Préparer des sportifs de haut niveau demande 7 à 8 années de travail continu et linéaire. La performance sportive nécessite du temps et de la stabilité. Le nombre de ministres en charge du sport, qui se sont succédés en un laps de temps réduit, montre combien nous avons besoin ici de durabilité et que c'est là l'une des tares, mais pas la seule. Par ignorance de cet historique, certains disent déjà que le projet s'inspire de ce qui s'est passé en France avec la création d'une agence pour s'occuper du sport. C'est donc archi faux. La revendication au Maroc est bien plus ancienne. Voilà une quarantaine d'années qu'il en est question. Déjà du temps du gouvernement Driss Jettou, cela était sur la table mais n'a pas abouti pour moult raisons, notamment à cause d'une certaine résistance qui ne veut pas, à aujourd'hui, que ce secteur extrêmement porteur sorte de la sphère politique. Le sport national ne peut que remercier le PJD pour cette audace, même si elle n'a pas beaucoup de chance d'aboutir, vu comment se passent les choses au parlement actuel. Le PJD étant largement minoritaire et sans réel appui de ses coéquipiers dans l'opposition. Il aura quand même réussi à poser le débat dans le bon sens. Les partisans de Si Benkirane font référence à juste titre à la lettre royale de 2008. Ils citent cependant la loi 30.09 sans dire pour autant que celle-ci a été catastrophique pour le sport national. Cela pourrait faire l'objet d'un prochain billet. Le second parti ayant soulevé la question du sport l'a fait tout fraîchement hier. Il s'agit du Front des Forces Démocratiques. Le parti, sous la houlette de Si Mustapha Benali, a remis au goût du jour la discussion des politiques publiques en sport, avec un panel extrêmement large et varié de spécialistes et de dirigeants et en présence de représentants de partis politiques de la même mouvance. Les débats ont été d'une très bonne facture avec un consensus très large autour de solutions qui paraissent évidentes et l'étonnement de ne pas les voir prises en compte. Ce genre de débats est autant nécessaire qu'urgent. Le Maroc, qui fait du sport et du football tout particulièrement un accélérateur de développement, ne peut plus attendre, sinon au prix de voir ses efforts colossaux gaspillés et donc dangereux pour son futur proche et lointain.
Aziz Daouda Aziz Daouda

Aziz Daouda

Directeur Technique et du Développement de la Confédération Africaine d'Athlétisme. Passionné du Maroc, passionné d'Afrique. Concerné par ce qui se passe, formulant mon point de vue quand j'en ai un. Humaniste, j'essaye de l'être, humain je veux l'être. Mon histoire est intimement liée à l'athlétisme marocain et mondial. J'ai eu le privilège de participer à la gloire de mon pays .


9500

33.0

Will AI coding replace me as a Software Engineer in Germany? 113

Will AI coding replace me as a Software Engineer in Germany? Today, my coworker showed me a Golf-Assistant app his friend built using claude code. It is fully functional, includes GPS tracking and a payment system, and it took him a couple of weekends to finish. It would take a Senior Software Engineer a couple of months to finish this, not using AI. Then he said "one day, we won't need us anymore" Will this really be the case though? Most companies use openai and anthropic as their LLM providers, and seeing the goofy mistake of anthropic not hiding sourcemap files while releasing a new version doesn't help with trust. For german companies, this is a gigantic no. Here someone has to be responsible. Someone has to pay the price in case of a problem, and the price is often high and heavy. Take H&M Hennes & Mauritz Online Shop as an example: managers illegally collected data on the private lives of their employees, this resulted in a 35.3 Million Euro fine, or Vodafone being fined a total of 45 Million Euros for two major breaches: 1-failing to oversee third party sales agencies, leading to fraud and 2- fro security flaw in their MeinVodafone Portal which allowed unauthorized access to customer eSim Profile. And these are man made errors ! What about potential AI-made errors? Most companies use chatgpt or claude as their LLM provider. So what if the AI Model made an error? Who would be responsible in the eyes of the law? Certainly not OpenAI or Anthropic Would the company itself be responsible for not having a good enough prompt to cover every single area of mistake the AI could make? What would be the extent of such a mistake? Would the company haft for not having another AI to double check what the initial AI did? If so, this would have to be an agentic system that react intelligently. How would such an agentic system look like and how much would it cost? And if the system becomes that big, how would you have it certified? tested? Could it scale easily? Does that have limits? In order for companies (still talking about Germany) to replace us with AI and 1- be completely covered in the eyes of the law and 2- follow the german standard of quality, this would roughly mean that: 1- The life cycle of the Data is 100% trackable and securely managed 2- AI doesn't make a single fatal mistake 3- There is a clear process that companies can follow to build a By-AI-Managed company and scale it afterwards 4- All of the previous questions (and many many more) are not only answered, but have specific and very detailed law texts. How long would this last? For a law to be passed nowadays it must go through a process that takes in average 1 to 2 years. Furtheremore, discussing before even proposing ONE new law text takes at least a couple of months. So would AI replace me as a software engineer in Germany? Curious to hear about how it is in your country?
linkedin.com/in/fares-aouani-che...

Morocco and the Trust Economy: The Invisible Capital of Development... 712

In the economic history of nations, some assets are visible, such as natural resources, geographical position, infrastructure, or market size. Others, however, are invisible but often decisive. Among them, trust holds a central place and constitutes the true cement of sustainable economies. An economy can survive with few natural resources, but it cannot prosper sustainably without trust. Morocco today has many assets: remarkable political stability, a strategic position, world-class infrastructure, and active economic diplomacy. Yet, the decisive step in development now consists of building a true trust economy, capable of sustainably reassuring citizens, entrepreneurs, and investors. This is not a slogan. Trust is an institutional and cultural architecture that is built over time. It is the primary capital of a modern economy and a determining factor. It reduces transaction costs, encourages investment, facilitates innovation, and stimulates individual initiative. When an entrepreneur knows that the rules of the game are stable, that contracts will be respected, and that justice is swift and independent, he invests more easily. When a citizen trusts the tax administration and institutions, he more willingly accepts taxes and participates in the formal economy. Conversely, a lack of trust generates precautionary behaviors: capital flight, informality, low long-term investment. The economy then becomes cautious, fragmented, and inefficient. For Morocco, the central question is therefore not only to attract investments, but to create an environment where trust becomes a collective reflex. It would be unfair not to recognize the considerable progress made over the past decades. The foundations are solid. The country has massively invested in infrastructure: Tanger Med is today one of the world's most important logistics hubs. Nador and Dakhla are coming soon. Industrial zones have enabled the emergence of high-performing sectors, in the automotive industry with Renault Group and Stellantis, and in aeronautics with Boeing, Airbus, and Safran. The country's ambition in energy transition is exemplary. This shows that it is capable of carrying out structuring projects and offering a stable macroeconomic environment. However, the next step in development requires a qualitative leap: moving from an opportunity economy to a trust economy with a determining role for the rule of law. Trust first rests on the solidity of institutions. For investors as for entrepreneurs, the predictability of rules is a decisive element. Laws must be stable, readable, and applied equally, with three particularly crucial dimensions: **The independence and efficiency of justice** A swift, accessible, and credible justice system is the keystone of any trust economy. Commercial disputes must be resolved within reasonable timeframes. Judicial decisions must be enforced without ambiguity. Legal security is often the primary factor of attractiveness. **Fiscal stability** Investors do not necessarily expect very low tax rates; they primarily seek stability and readability. Predictable taxation allows companies to plan investments over the long term. Morocco has already undertaken several major tax reforms, but the challenge now is to go further and consolidate a clear and durable fiscal pact. **The fight against rents and privileges** Trust disappears when the rules of the game seem unequal. A dynamic economy relies on fair competition and equal opportunities. Transparency in public markets, competition regulation, and limiting rent situations are essential levers. A trust economy is also an economy of freedom, capable of unleashing entrepreneurial energy. The freedom to enterprise, innovate, and experiment is one of the fundamental engines of growth. Morocco has a talented youth, competent engineers, and an influential diaspora. However, several obstacles remain: administrative complexity, access to financing for SMEs, slowness of certain procedures. The challenge is to create an environment where individual initiative becomes the norm rather than the exception. Moroccan startups in fintech, artificial intelligence, or agricultural technologies already demonstrate the country's potential. With a more fluid ecosystem, they could become tomorrow's economic champions. In a world marked by geopolitical uncertainty and economic recompositions, trust also becomes a comparative advantage. If Morocco manages to position itself as a country where rules are stable, justice reliable, and administration predictable, it could become one of the main investment platforms between Europe and Africa. This ambition aligns with the Kingdom's African strategies and its growing international openness. Trust could thus become Morocco's true economic hallmark. Several strategic orientations deserve to be prioritized: - Accelerate the modernization of the judicial system, particularly in handling commercial disputes and enforcing judicial decisions. - Radically simplify administrative procedures for businesses through complete digitalization of public services. - Establish multi-year fiscal stability to enhance visibility. - Promote transparency and fair competition in all economic sectors. - Strengthen training and valorization of human capital, particularly in technological and scientific fields. - Develop a culture of trust between the State, businesses, and citizens. This dimension is often overlooked, yet it constitutes the invisible foundation of development. Morocco finds itself today at a pivotal moment in its economic history. The infrastructure is in place, strategic ambitions are affirmed, and the international environment offers new opportunities. The next step therefore consists of building a sustainable trust ecosystem. If Morocco succeeds in this gamble, and it must, it could not only accelerate its development but also become one of the most credible and attractive economies in the emerging world. In the 21st-century global economy, trust is undoubtedly the rarest and most powerful capital.

Football: When Passion Kills the Game in Impunity and Tolerance.. 1414

Football (Soccer for Americans) is first and foremost a matter of emotions. By its very essence, it is an open-air theater where human passions play out in their rawest, most primal form. It generates joy, anger, pride, humiliation, and a sense of belonging. From the stands of Camp Nou to those of the Diego Armando Maradona Stadium, through the fervor of the Mohamed V sport Complex in Casablanca, the vibrant enclosures of Stade Léopold Sédar Senghor in Dakar, or even the Parc des Princes in Paris, the Vélodrome In Marseille, and the Bernabeu In Madrid, football transcends the mere framework of the game to become a total social phenomenon. But this emotional intensity, which makes football's beauty, also constitutes its danger. For without rigorous regulation, it quickly tips into excess, then into violence. Today, it must be acknowledged that the rules exist, but they are too often circumvented, stripped of their substance, or applied with disconcerting leniency. On the pitches as in the stands, excesses are multiplying: insults toward referees, provocations between players, systematic challenges, physical violence, projectile throwing, pitch invasions, xenophobic remarks, racist offenses. What was once the exception is tending to become a tolerated norm. Astonishingly, we are starting to get used to it. Recent examples are telling. In Spain, in stadiums renowned for their football culture, racist chants continue to be belted out without shame, targeting players like Vinícius Júnior. Most recently, it was the Muslim community that was insulted. And yet, Spain's current football prodigy is Muslim. An overheated crowd that has doubtless forgotten it wasn't so long ago that it was Muslim itself. Among those chanting these remarks, and without a doubt, some still carry the genes of that recent past... In Dakar, just a few days ago, clashes escalated, turning a sports celebration into a scene of chaos. In Italy, incidents involving supporters who invaded the pitch, during a friendly match, no less, endangered players and officials, recalling the dark hours of European hooliganism in the 1980s. These episodes are not isolated; they reflect a worrying normalization of violence in and around stadiums. Even at the highest level of African football, behavioral excesses are becoming problematic. The 2025 Africa Cup of Nations final left a bitter taste. What should have been a moment of celebration for continental football was marred by behaviors contrary to sporting ethics. Pressures on refereeing, excessive challenges, and game interruptions have become commonplace. When a coach manipulates a match's rhythm to influence a refereeing decision, it is no longer strategy but a challenge to the very foundations of the sport. Despite international outrage, the sanctions imposed on teams, clubs, or players involved remain often symbolic, insufficient to eradicate these behaviors. A very surprising phenomenon: rarely have clubs or federations clearly distanced themselves from such crowds. They accommodate them, and when they condemn them, it is half-heartedly, in a muffled, timid tone with no effect. The problem is twofold. On one hand, disciplinary regulations exist but lack firmness. On the other, their application suffers from a lack of consistency and political courage. Bodies like FIFA, continental confederations, and national federations hesitate to impose truly dissuasive sanctions such as point deductions, prolonged closed-door matches, competition exclusions, or even administrative relegations. Yet without fear of sanction, the rule loses all effectiveness. It suffices to compare with other sports to measure the gap. In rugby, for example, respect for the referee is a cardinal value. The slightest challenge is immediately sanctioned. In athletics, a false start leads to immediate disqualification, no discussion. Football, meanwhile, still tolerates too many behaviors that should be unacceptable. This permissiveness has a cost. It undermines football's image, discourages some families from attending stadiums, and endangers the safety of the game's actors. More gravely, it paves the way for future tragedies. History has already taught us, through catastrophes like the Heysel Stadium disaster, that violence in stadiums can have tragic consequences. It is therefore urgent to react. Regulating football does not mean killing its soul, but rather preserving it. It is not about extinguishing passions, but channeling them. This requires strong measures, exemplary sanctions against offending clubs and players, accountability for national federations, increased use of technology to identify troublemakers, and above all, a clear political will from national and international governing bodies. Football cannot continue to be this "market of emotion" left to its own devices. For by tolerating the intolerable, it risks losing what makes its greatness and its ability to unite rather than divide. If FIFA does not decide to act firmly, the danger is real: that of seeing football sink into a spiral where violence triumphs over the game, and where, one day, tragedies exceed the mere framework of sport. The long-awaited decision of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in the 2025 AFCON final case should confirm rigor and integrity in the application of rules, at least at this level, thereby strengthening the credibility of the pan-African competition and football in general.