Think Forward.

European Parliament: two idiotic votes.. 860

Aziz Daouda, 6 d.
2 min read.

European Parliament: two idiotic votes..

Aziz Daouda, 5 d.
The recent vote in favor of a European resolution calling for the release of the writer Boualem Sansal has finally revealed what a certain Left in France is all about. What it thinks, its doctrinaire tendencies, its ideological heritage, its philology and, above all, its idea of freedom of expression and humanism. Two French MEPs, representing the country of the Enlightenment and the Declaration of the human Rights, found nothing more intelligent to distinguish themselves in the eyes of Europeans than to go against the grain of what any sensible person might think: one abstained and the other voted against the resolution outright. This is the position of the political movement they represent and not a personal one. One is known for having little to show for it other than the fact that her inheritance makes her a political pensioner, while the other shines through her bizarre positions, waltzing to and fro between extreme left-wing and extreme right-wing ideas. It's enough to make you dizzy. All that matters is that she is getting coverage in the media every day. She hasn't been taught that value and enhancement come with scarcity, not profusion. For example, she is the only one who knows where the Mecca of freedoms and revolutionaries is on the world map. So for these two turbulent political figures, the 553 MEPs who voted for the resolution were probably wrong. By their votes, the two excitements have defended the arbitrary imprisonment of a 75-year-old man; an intellectual who in a television program simply recalled historical and geographical facts, without calling for anything, or pleading for anything. The true face of a certain French Left is thus revealed; still nostalgic for the totalitarian regimes of the Eastern bloc... Fundamentally nostalgic for the only truth that is that of the single party. But they don't tell the French that; they practice it. But aren't they themselves, as young as they are, the victims of leftist indoctrination from another time, which has numbed their minds and inhibited the neurons of discernment and lucidity? They have always lived in an environment where common sense is the daily target of outdated propaganda, the legacy of another time; a time that has run out of steam before our very eyes but to which they have simply remained faithful. Foolish ideology always ends up killing... So human beings don't count for them, and the law even less... Let's not forget that they and their acolytes are nothing more than a contemporary digression from Ceausescu, Tito or Brezhnev and their parties, not to mention Stalin and co... Their names are not mentioned in this text as a prelude to the fact that history is unlikely to remember them. They are the epitome of imbecility and nothing else. Their votes did not count.

European Parliament: two idiotic votes..

Aziz Daouda, 5 d.
The recent vote in favour of a European resolution calling for the release of the writer Boualem Sansal has finally revealed what a certain Left in France is all about. What it thinks, its doctrinaire tendencies, its ideological heritage, its philology and, above all, its idea of freedom of expression and humanism. Two French MEPs, representing the country of the Enlightenment and the Declaration of the human Rights, found nothing more intelligent to distinguish themselves in the eyes of Europeans than to go against the grain of what any sensible person might think: one abstained and the other voted against the resolution outright. This is the position of the political movement they represent and not a personal one. One is known for having little to show for it other than the fact that her inheritance makes her a political pensioner, while the other shines through her bizarre positions, waltzing to and fro between extreme left-wing and extreme right-wing ideas. It's enough to make you dizzy. All that matters is that she is getting coverage in the media every day. She hasn't been taught that value and enhancement come with scarcity, not profusion. For example, she is the only one who knows where the Mecca of freedoms and revolutionaries is on the world map. So for these two turbulent political figures, the 553 MEPs who voted for the resolution were probably wrong. By their votes, the two excitements have defended the arbitrary imprisonment of a 75-year-old man; an intellectual who in a television programme simply recalled historical and geographical facts, without calling for anything, or pleading for anything. The true face of a certain French Left is thus revealed; still nostalgic for the totalitarian regimes of the Eastern bloc... Fundamentally nostalgic for the only truth that is that of the single party. But they don't tell the French that; they practice it. But aren't they themselves, as young as they are, the victims of leftist indoctrination from another time, which has numbed their minds and inhibited the neurons of discernment and lucidity? They have always lived in an environment where common sense is the daily target of outdated propaganda, the legacy of another time; a time that has run out of steam before our very eyes but to which they have simply remained faithful. Foolish ideology always ends up killing... So human beings don't count for them, and the law even less... Let's not forget that they and their acolytes are nothing more than a contemporary digression from Ceausescu, Tito or Brezhnev and their parties, not to mention Stalin and co... Their names are not mentioned in this text as a prelude to the fact that history is unlikely to remember them. They are the epitome of imbecility and nothing else. Their votes did not count.

European Parliament: two idiotic votes..

Aziz Daouda, 6 d.
The recent vote in favour of a European resolution calling for the release of the writer Boualem Sansal has finally revealed what a certain Left in France is all about. What it thinks, its doctrinaire tendencies, its ideological heritage, its philology and, above all, its idea of freedom of expression and humanism. Two French MEPs, representing the country of the Enlightenment and the Declaration of the human Rights, found nothing more intelligent to distinguish themselves in the eyes of Europeans than to go against the grain of what any sensible person might think: one abstained and the other voted against the resolution outright. This is the position of the political movement they represent and not a personal one. One is known for having little to show for it other than the fact that her inheritance makes her a political pensioner, while the other shines through her bizarre positions, waltzing to and fro between extreme left-wing and extreme right-wing ideas. It's enough to make you dizzy. All that matters is that she is getting coverage in the media every day. She hasn't been taught that value and enhancement come with scarcity, not profusion. For example, she is the only one who knows where the Mecca of freedoms and revolutionaries is on the world map. So for these two turbulent political figures, the 503 MEPs who voted for the resolution were probably wrong. By their votes, the two excitements have defended the arbitrary imprisonment of a 75-year-old man; an intellectual who in a television programme simply recalled historical and geographical facts, without calling for anything, or pleading for anything. The true face of a certain French Left is thus revealed; still nostalgic for the totalitarian regimes of the Eastern bloc... Fundamentally nostalgic for the only truth that is that of the single party. But they don't tell the French that; they practice it. But aren't they themselves, as young as they are, the victims of leftist indoctrination from another time, which has numbed their minds and inhibited the neurons of discernment and lucidity? They have always lived in an environment where common sense is the daily target of outdated propaganda, the legacy of another time; a time that has run out of steam before our very eyes but to which they have simply remained faithful. Foolish ideology always ends up killing... So human beings don't count for them, and the law even less... Let's not forget that they and their acolytes are nothing more than a contemporary digression from Ceausescu, Tito or Brezhnev and their parties, not to mention Stalin and co... Their names are not mentioned in this text as a prelude to the fact that history is unlikely to remember them. They are the epitome of imbecility and nothing else. Their votes did not count.

European Parliament: two idiotic votes..

Aziz Daouda, 6 d.
The recent vote in favour of a European resolution calling for the release of the writer Boualem Sansal has finally revealed what a certain Left in France is all about. What it thinks, its doctrinaire tendencies, its ideological heritage, its philology and, above all, its idea of freedom of expression and humanism. Two French MEPs, representing the country of the Enlightenment and the Declaration of the Rights of Man, found nothing more intelligent to distinguish themselves in the eyes of Europeans than to go against the grain of what any sensible person might think: one abstained and the other voted against the resolution outright. This is the position of the political movement they represent and not a personal one. One is known for having little to show for it other than the fact that her inheritance makes her a political pensioner, while the other shines through her bizarre positions, waltzing to and fro between extreme left-wing and extreme right-wing ideas. It's enough to make you dizzy. All that matters is that she is getting coverage in the media every day. She hasn't been taught that value and enhancement come with scarcity, not profusion. For example, she is the only one who knows where the Mecca of freedoms and revolutionaries is on the world map. So for these two turbulent political figures, the 503 MEPs who voted for the resolution were probably wrong. By their votes, the two excitements have defended the arbitrary imprisonment of a 75-year-old man; an intellectual who in a television programme simply recalled historical and geographical facts, without calling for anything, or pleading for anything. The true face of a certain French Left is thus revealed; still nostalgic for the totalitarian regimes of the Eastern bloc... Fundamentally nostalgic for the only truth that is that of the single party. But they don't tell the French that; they practice it. But aren't they themselves, as young as they are, the victims of leftist indoctrination from another time, which has numbed their minds and inhibited the neurons of discernment and lucidity? They have always lived in an environment where common sense is the daily target of outdated propaganda, the legacy of another time; a time that has run out of steam before our very eyes but to which they have simply remained faithful. Foolish ideology always ends up killing... So human beings don't count for them, and the law even less... Let's not forget that they and their acolytes are nothing more than a contemporary digression from Ceausescu, Tito or Brezhnev and their parties, not to mention Stalin and co... Their names are not mentioned in this text as a prelude to the fact that history is unlikely to remember them. They are the epitome of imbecility and nothing else. Their votes did not count.