Think Forward.

Vandalisme au stade Mohamed V : le match est ailleurs... 865

Le vandalisme survenu récemment au complexe Mohamed V de Casablanca n’a rien de nouveau. Ce qui l’est en revanche, c’est qu’il ait éclaté à peine une semaine après la réouverture en grande pompe de ce stade mythique, fraîchement rénové pour accueillir le très attendu derby casablancais. Une réouverture précipitée, symbole d’un espoir vite rattrapé par la réalité : celle d’une violence endémique qui dépasse les efforts de modernisation. Le derby s'était bien passé, les Ultras en avaient décidé le boycott. Une semaine plus tard, ils étaient bien là et le feront bruyamment remarquer... Une partie du stade en portera les stigmates. Des sièges conçus pour les accueillir et des sanitaires pour leur confort sont saccagés. Il faudra refaire tout cela pour la CAN... C'est de l'argent public, nos impôts, nos emprunts. Lors de certains matchs du Wydad, du Raja, ou ailleurs au Maroc, le comportement d’une frange du public s’avère de plus en plus préoccupant. Ce phénomène, aux degrés variables de dangerosité, dure depuis des années et perturbe gravement l’ordre public. Il met à rude épreuve les forces de sécurité et soulève de nombreuses interrogations d’ordre sociologique, institutionnel et sécuritaire. De nombreuses études ont été menées, sans aboutir à des solutions concrètes. Car ce phénomène est complexe : il ne découle pas uniquement des résultats sportifs. Dans le cas présent, on peut pourtant évoquer la frustration accumulée des supporters des deux grandes équipes casablancaises, en déclin ces derniers temps. Depuis l’introduction du mouvement ultra au Maroc, via la Tunisie en 2005, les jeunes tifosis du Raja et du Wydad ont colonisé leurs virages respectifs et étendu leur influence jusque dans les rues. Leur créativité dans les tifos impressionne, certes, mais les débordements sont désormais la norme. Rares sont les matchs sans violences, à l’intérieur comme à l’extérieur du stade. Rien n’y fait : ni les huis clos, ni les sanctions, ni les peines de prison. Pire encore, la situation se dégrade. Scènes de pillage, affrontements violents autour des stades sont désormais une réalité, et pas uniquement à Casablanca. Même de petites villes, sans grands enjeux footballistiques, ne sont plus épargnées. Il serait hasardeux de comparer la situation ici à celle d’autres pays. Depuis la naissance du mouvement ultra en 1899 en Hongrie, son essor au Brésil dans les années 1930, sa transformation en Yougoslavie, jusqu’à son renouveau en Italie dans les années 1960, ce phénomène n’a cessé d’évoluer. Il en va de même au Royaume-Uni avec le hooliganisme dans les années 1970. Dans le cas marocain, nous faisons face à une expression singulière du mouvement : un particularisme enraciné dans les dynamiques sociales, économiques et culturelles locales. Il échappe aux grilles d’analyse classiques, se forge une esthétique propre, des codes singuliers, et une capacité de mobilisation qui dépasse le cadre du football. C’est une réinvention du phénomène à la lumière des réalités locales. Les réponses institutionnelles n'ont pas tardé : promulgation de loi, réunions élargies par la DGSN, cellules spécialisées, colloques scientifiques. En vain. L’encadrement sécuritaire peine à équilibrer prévention et répression. Il est souvent pris pour cible. Les clubs, eux, persistent dans un amateurisme organisationnel préoccupant. Les subventions généreuses et l'absence de reddition des comptes en sont les principaux facteurs. Nombreux sont les clubs de la Botola souffrant d’une gouvernance décriée, déconnectée des réalités des supporters et des déterminants du sport de performance. Entraîneurs et joueurs subissent une pression permanente de supporters virulents. Le fait footballistique explique-t-il à lui seul le phénomène ? Ou bien le stade devient-il un exutoire, un espace de catharsis pour une jeunesse marginalisée, frustrée, sans perspectives ? Ce n’est pas uniquement de la violence sportive : c’est une colère sociale, profonde, qui prend le football comme alibi. Chaque provocation, défaite ou injustice arbitrale est perçue comme une humiliation. La tension, déjà palpable, explose dans les tribunes. Malgré les arrestations, les sanctions manquent d’efficacité structurelle. L’absence de suivi judiciaire renforce l’idée que le vandalisme est toléré. L’accueil triomphal réservé à certains jeunes à leur sortie de prison en dit long : ils ne regrettent rien. Au contraire, ils en sortent auréolés d’un prestige inquiétant. C’est ici que le lien peut être fait avec les conclusions récentes du Haut-Commissariat au Plan (HCP), qui a publié une enquête alarmante sur le moral des ménages. L’Indice de Confiance des Ménages (ICM) a chuté à 46,6 points au premier trimestre 2025, son plus bas niveau depuis 2008. Il était de 87,3 en 2018. Une chute vertigineuse. Le pessimisme est général : 81 % des ménages estiment que leur niveau de vie s’est détérioré. L’endettement est écrasant, l’inflation s’installe, et la lassitude est palpable. Ce désespoir se traduit dans les chants des ultras, leurs slogans, parfois subversifs, souvent désabusés. Ils fédèrent largement, y compris une jeunesse pourtant à l’aise matériellement. Les ultras ratissent large maintenant. Pendant ce temps, les partis politiques sont absents du débat public (sauf en période électorale). Les syndicats, ultra-minoritaires, ne représentent plus qu’une infime frange des travailleurs. Et comme la nature a horreur du vide, il est comblé par d'autres formes d'expression, parfois politiques, parfois violentes, souvent instrumentalisées. Les jeunes désœuvrés trouvent dans les stades, et parfois dans la rue, un exutoire à leur frustration. Des slogans récents, ostensiblement liés à des causes géopolitiques comme la normalisation avec Israël, ne sont souvent que des prétextes. Les adeptes de certaines idéologies subversives ont parfaitement compris. Ils ont saisi l’opportunité et s’y sont engouffrés. Les jeunes cherchant à exister, à crier leur rejet d’un système qu'ils pensent sourd à leurs attentes, sont happés, radicalisés, manipulés, manœuvrés dangereusement. La politique n'est jamais très loin. Ces derniers jours, des colloques sur " l'encouragement sportif " sont organisés par les autorités locales, présidés par les walis. Une question cruciale demeure cependant : la jeunesse concernée répond-elle à l'invitation? Sans elle, sans volonté d’écoute réelle et réforme profonde et structurelle, ces efforts risquent encore une fois de se perdre dans le bruit de fond d’une crise bien plus grave qu’une simple rencontre de football gagnée ou perdue. Il y a pourtant des ébauches de solutions préconisées dans le désormais oublié Nouveau Modèle de Développement. Les difficultés ne manquent pas tant s'en faut mais le match est ailleurs.
Aziz Daouda

Aziz Daouda

Directeur Technique et du Développement de la Confédération Africaine d'Athlétisme. Passionné du Maroc, passionné d'Afrique. Concerné par ce qui se passe, formulant mon point de vue quand j'en ai un. Humaniste, j'essaye de l'être, humain je veux l'être. Mon histoire est intimement liée à l'athlétisme marocain et mondial. J'ai eu le privilège de participer à la gloire de mon pays .


6300

33.0

Council of Europe Conference on Human Rights in Sport Held in Rabat, Morocco. 234

The Council of Europe, in collaboration with the Ministry of Preschool Education and Sports, and with the support of the Swiss Embassy to the Kingdom, organized in Rabat on June 23 and 24 a conference dedicated to Human Rights in Sport. All relevant departments and administrations, the national sports movement, as well as researchers specializing in the field were invited. The choice of date was no coincidence: we are just a few months away from the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations, and a few years from the FIFA World Cup co-hosted by Morocco, Spain, and Portugal. These major sporting events require the Kingdom to strengthen and update its legal and institutional framework regarding human rights in sport. For the Council of Europe, sport is not only an essential physical and social activity but also a fundamental vector of human rights, embodying values such as respect, non-discrimination, solidarity, and justice. To protect and promote these rights, it relies on several key conventions: the Macolin Convention, the Anti-Doping Convention, and the Saint-Denis Convention. These legal instruments form the cornerstone of its commitment to ethical, safe, and inclusive sport. Morocco has signed the Macolin Convention, which is awaiting ratification. It has also acceded to the provisions of the Anti-Doping Convention but remains an observer regarding the Saint-Denis Convention. The conference therefore addressed these different legal frameworks, further explained them, and reviewed the Kingdom’s progress in these areas. Following the official opening and presentations by the departments of the Ministry of National Education, Preschool and Sports, the Ministry of Justice, the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the representative of the Royal Moroccan Football Federation, Swiss ambassador and the Head of the Council of Europe Office in Rabat, several experts took the floor to elaborate on the theme: Prof. Younes Lazrak Hassouni presented the Moroccan national legal framework concerning human rights in sport. Dr. Fatima Abouali, President of the Moroccan Anti-Doping Agency (AMAD), spoke about AMAD’s commitment to respecting human rights. The Anti-Doping Convention (1989, amended in 2002) seeks to preserve health and sporting fairness by eradicating doping, which is considered a violation of sports ethics and a threat to athletes’ health. It supports the fundamental right to healthy and fair sport, guaranteeing the dignity of participants. Mr. Younes El Mechrafi, General Director of Moroccan Games and Sports, addressed the fight against illegal betting in light of the Macolin Convention, highlighting recent developments, particularly in combating illegal betting. The Macolin Convention (2014) aims to strengthen national coordination and international cooperation to prevent and combat the manipulation of sports competitions, whether related to criminal activities or sports betting. It protects the integrity of sport, ensuring a fair environment for athletes and spectators—an essential aspect of human rights in sport. The Moroccan presentations were followed by those of Council of Europe experts: Ms. Elena Caser, from the Sports Division, outlined the Council’s priority areas for preserving sports integrity. Mr. Nicolas Sayde detailed the implementation of the Macolin Convention to combat competition manipulation, using concrete examples. Ms. Marie Françoise Glatz, Secretary of the Saint-Denis Convention, presented the principles and standards of this convention, emphasizing its integrated and multi-institutional approach to the secure management of sporting events. Mr. Paulo Gomes, Head of the Convention Unit, stressed the added value of this convention for Morocco, especially regarding a strengthened legal framework and the security of upcoming major sporting events. The objective was clear: to convince Morocco to fully adhere to the Saint-Denis Convention. To date, this convention is the only binding international instrument that establishes an integrated approach to ensure the safety, security, and quality of services at sporting events. It promotes close cooperation between public authorities, private actors, and supporters to create welcoming, safe sporting events that respect human rights, particularly in combating violence, racism, and discrimination. This last convention sparked extensive debate, especially among representatives of the Ministry of Justice, the Public Prosecutor’s Office, and the General Directorate of National Security, as Morocco is currently preparing its legal arsenal for hosting the Africa Cup of Nations and the World Cup, in accordance with the requirements of various specifications. Beyond international conventions, Morocco is one of the few countries in the world to have enshrined sport and physical activity in its Constitution. It establishes these as a right for citizens and an obligation for the State. Physical activity constitutes the primary pillar of any comprehensive health system, both physical and mental. Sport plays a crucial role through its recreational, social, political, and geopolitical dimensions. It is also an important economic sector, contributing significantly to GDP, directly or indirectly. The Kingdom has a solid normative framework: Law No. 30-09 on physical education and sports, Law No. 84-12 on the organization of sports activities, Law No. 09-09 against violence in stadiums, and Law No. 97-12 on anti-doping, which regulates controls and sanctions. These laws are complemented by Decree No. 2-10-628 of 2011 relating to Law 30-09. This fairly comprehensive system aims to make sport a space of respect, fairness, and solidarity, in line with the universal values of human rights. The proper organization of sporting events, the fight against doping, and the fight against violence form a fundamental triptych guaranteeing integrity, health, safety, and respect for fundamental rights in sport. This integrated vision places sport at the heart of public policies promoting human rights, making it a powerful lever for a fairer, more inclusive, and more united society. Holding this conference in Rabat confirms the Kingdom’s determination to comply with the highest international standards in this field and demonstrates its openness to cooperation with its partners, notably the European Union and its dedicated bodies.

Mauritania’s Ambiguous Stance on the Western Sahara Conflict 279

The Mauritanian Minister of Culture, Arts, Communication, and Relations with Parliament, Government Spokesperson El Houssein Ould Meddou, recently spoke on France 24 regarding Mauritania’s position on the so-called Western Sahara conflict. Clearly uncomfortable, to the point of appearing surprised by the journalist’s question, he seemed to stammer while affirming that Mauritania adopts a policy of neutrality, introducing a new concept: that of “positive and active neutrality” in this matter. Very clumsily, he reduced the issue to a matter between Morocco and what he called “the Sahara,” without specifying who exactly he meant. He got further bogged down when he claimed that his country does not limit itself to a passive stance but is sincerely committed to contributing to a fair political solution, serving regional stability and the interests of all parties involved. Again, no clarification was given on who these parties are, and whether his own country is included or not. This borders on contradiction with his earlier statements. According to the Minister, this neutrality is expressed notably by Mauritania’s willingness to play a central role in facilitating dialogue between the conflict’s actors, fostering a climate of trust and overcoming political deadlock. However, he seemed not to have carefully read the Security Council resolutions since 2007. The Minister showed more irritation when the journalist asked about the closure of Lebriga, the border post between Mauritania and Algeria. He appeared unaware of this closure, which is surprising given that the decision sparked major controversy and strong reactions from separatists against his own country and government. After some hesitation, he awkwardly stated that the recent Mauritanian decision to close the Lebriga crossing on the Algerian border was a measure taken for internal security reasons, aimed at controlling crossings and protecting national sovereignty. His attempt to recover only entrenched him further. For him, this decision has no political significance and targets no particular party but responds to a state approach to securing borders. Quite astonishing. The Mauritanian Minister thus explicitly reduced the so-called Western Sahara conflict to a simple matter between Morocco and what he called “the Sahara.” Did he realize at that moment the sensitive political repercussions he was causing? Indeed, this position was perceived as indirect support for the Algerian version of the conflict. Algeria quickly reacted by officially inviting the minister and bestowing many honors on him. This instant Algerian response can only be interpreted as a reward for the minister’s risky stance. He thus placed himself in a situation where he contradicted himself. The “positive neutrality” he mentioned becomes clear: it is actually alignment with the Algerian position. This situation embarrassed the Mauritanian government and presidency, which did not officially endorse the minister’s remarks. Several government members expressed discomfort with this statement, emphasizing that it does not reflect Mauritania’s official position. Moreover, within Mauritanian civil society, critical voices emerged, denouncing the apparent ignorance of the minister on sensitive issues, notably the border with Algeria. During the interview, the journalist noted that the minister seemed poorly informed on this subject, which heightened the discomfort around his statements. On the Moroccan side, the reaction to the Mauritanian government spokesperson’s remarks was very measured, even officially nonexistent. Morocco, as usual, chose not to publicly respond to this declaration, probably considering that the Mauritanian minister is only a marginal actor, not part of Mauritania’s true leadership circle. This silence can be interpreted as a strategy to avoid giving importance to these remarks, so as not to fuel unnecessary controversy or unduly embarrass Mauritania’s real leaders. It should be noted that this interview took place before recent Polisario strikes near Smara, close to MINURSO positions, which officially complained. The mercenaries operated by passing through Mauritanian territory, where they were neutralized by the Royal Armed Forces. The clumsy declaration of the so-called spokesperson created implicit diplomatic tension, revealing internal divisions in Mauritania and illustrating the regional complexities surrounding the so-called Western Sahara conflict, where every stance is scrutinized and can have significant diplomatic consequences, without hindering the inevitable and confirmed historical evolution: the progress and consolidation of the solution proposed by Morocco, reinforced by the recognition of the Moroccan sovereignty over the territories in question by nearly all key countries, among others. By his posture, the minister thus disregarded recent developments, notably the bipartisan introduction in the U.S. Congress of the “Polisario Front Terrorist Designation Act,” which a political leader in his position could not have ignored. He simply sidelined his own country, which is directly impacted.

Infernal passion 508

Fire of passion To the one whose fire of passion burns me How to win your heart, tell me I remain lost and confused and I have no choice I gaze at the stars and lose sleep Yet you promised me the earth and the stars And you swore that like a branch you would resist the wind And that you would hold firm But at the first breath you bent And you shied away at the risk of breaking everything Long gone are the days of your promises Of joys and gladness Your indifference is morbid It kills me and drains me You walked away after a fleeting romance Yet it is neither your habit nor your style It was then that I understood that you were gone for good And I sat down and gave myself over to the wind Mourning your departure The night then How late it is I put on mourning clothes And wept, overcoming my pride I will complain to the judge of passion And denounce your schemes and your ways Only he will know how to do me justice And repair your wrongs So you will feel what I feel And you will burn just like me by the fire of passion Dr. Fouad Bouchareb All rights reserved Inspired by a mawal of Andalusian music January 1, 2025

Bipartisan U.S. Bill Seeks to Designate Polisario Front as Foreign Terrorist Organization 674

A promis is a promise. As he had already announced a few weeks ago, Joe Wilson, a Republican senator representing South Carolina, has just introduced a bipartisan bill in the United States House of Representatives aimed at designating the Polisario Front as a foreign terrorist organization. This bill is bipartisan because it is also signed and proposed by California Democratic Senator Jimmy Panetta. The project, titled "Polisario Front Terrorist Designation Act," aims to list the Polisario on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations. Being on this blacklist automatically triggers severe sanctions, such as the prohibition of any material or financial support, freezing of assets under U.S. jurisdiction, and entry bans to the United States for members of the organization. By extension, the vote on this bill will also have a direct and significant impact on the host country of the Polisario and its potential supporters. The content of the bill is simple and clear. The Polisario is described as a Marxist militia supported by Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia. It is asserted that this militia destabilizes the Western Sahara region and threatens the security of the Kingdom of Morocco, a steadfast historical ally of the United States. The bill also highlights alleged links between the Polisario and extremist groups in the Sahel, while mentioning serious accusations of human rights violations committed by the militia. Senators could have enriched the text by recalling the origins of the movement, notably the support from Cuba and the generosity of Gaddafi towards it for decades. This will likely be discussed during debates. In the current geopolitical context, the Polisario is perceived as an Iranian proxy hostile to regional stability, particularly due to its involvement in smuggling networks and terrorist activities in the region, facts that are well documented. The text thus seeks to officially recognize the Polisario as a terrorist entity, which would allow, besides international sanctions, to strengthen security cooperation against this separatist movement. The initiative has a very strong chance of succeeding after, of course, satisfying all necessary steps and procedures. The bill was introduced on June 24, 2025, and is currently under review by the Foreign Affairs and Judiciary Committees of the House of Representatives. The U.S. legislative process involves several steps: committee review and approval, House vote, Senate passage, and then the President's signature. The exact duration of the process varies, but committee review usually takes several weeks or months, followed by votes in plenary sessions. The bill seems to enjoy strong support, as it is sponsored by both a Democrat and a Republican, eliminating partisan division at this level. It could be adopted in the coming months, although nothing guarantees a rapid or certain progression, as political and geopolitical debates could influence the timeline. Adopting this law would mark a historic shift in U.S. policy on Western Sahara, with significant diplomatic and security implications. The United States, having already officially recognized the Moroccan sovereignty over the concerned provinces, would thus strengthen its position and lead to increased support for Morocco. The resolution of the artificial conflict, which has lasted half a century over the southern provinces of the Kingdom, has never been closer. The Republican majority controls both the House and the Senate, with 218 seats out of 435 in the House and 53 out of 100 in the Senate, which would facilitate the bill's passage. Moreover, Republicans are very disciplined and strongly support this initiative, notably due to their loyalty to Donald Trump and the expressed support of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who aligns with Moroccan positions. The bill introduced by Senators Joe Wilson and Jimmy Panetta therefore has a strong chance of quickly succeeding. The text benefits from bipartisan support, increasing its chances of adoption without major obstacles. The geopolitical context, reinforced by recent reports from American think tanks Heritage Foundation and Hudson Institute demonstrating the terrorist nature of the Polisario and its links with Iran and other hostile actors, politically legitimizes this proposal. The bipartisan bill aiming to designate the Polisario as a terrorist organization thus finds its full justification given the proven links with actors hostile to American and Moroccan interests, as well as its destabilizing activities in the region. Once the law is adopted by both chambers, the President has ten days to sign it, which can accelerate its enactment if the executive is favorable, which seems very likely.

The flower of my dreams 789

The flower of my dreams Oh ! Flower of my dreams grown in my heart And that they took me away Wrongly, what a horror!! hands have crumpled it cruelly Yet her beauty dazzled the eyes A gift from the God of heaven She bewitched young and old Now the fire of my passion has gone out My heart lies empty and bruised I sacrificed my life I lost the rhythm of my melodies And like a bird perched on a branch I dare sing to my faded, to my rose Poetry and prose Hoping to see her resurrected And regain its former splendor Thus dreams hopes will be reborn She will shine with her beauty And will be the star of my bouquet Inspired by the song of Farid Al Atrache (يا زهرة في خيالي) Dr Fouad Bouchareb July 19, 2022 All rights reserved