Think Forward.

Dopage, un problème de santé publique... 4413

Aziz Daouda, 2 y.

- Science - Health - Sports -

3.3 min read.

Je viens de passer une journée mémorable à Khouribga, le 30 décembre de l’année écoulée à l’invitation de l’Agence Marocaine Antidopage que préside la vaillante Fatima Abouali. C’était à l’occasion de l’une des étapes de la Caravane Nationale « Sport sans dopage », visant la sensibilisation des jeunes quant aux dangers des substances dopantes sur la santé; caravane placée sous le haut patronage de Sa Majesté le Roi , que Dieu l'assiste. A chacune de ces invitations, car ce n'est pas la première puisque j'avais participé à l'étape de Laayoune et d'Errachidia, l'occasion m'est donnée pour m'adresser aux autorités et personnalités présentes mais surtout aux dirigeants sportifs et aux jeunes. AMAD est l’autorité marocaine compétente en matière de lutte contre le dopage. Elle est assez récente puisque n’a été créée que suite aux directives royales contenues dans la lettre historique aux assises du sport en 2008. Elle compte aujourd'hui 3 ans d'âge. Cela ne veut point dire que les sportifs marocains n’étaient pas contrôlés avant la création de l’AMAD. C’était alors les fédérations internationales, puis une agence régionale qui contrôlait les sportifs dans toute la région d’Afrique du Nord. Sa Majesté disait en substance en 2008, dans cette lettre : « …Cela vaut également pour le dopage, qui constitue un phénomène étranger à nos traditions et à notre culture et qui est répréhensible par la loi et l'éthique sportive. C'est pourquoi Nous engageons les autorités compétentes à sévir vigoureusement contre cette pratique et à faire preuve d'intransigeance dans la répression de l'utilisation et de la commercialisation des substances dopantes, et ce, conformément à la législation nationale et à nos engagements internationaux en la matière. » C’est à cela que travaille sans répit l’AMAD. Outre de veiller sur les sportifs de haut niveau soumis de par la règlementation internationale à des protocoles strictes de contrôles réguliers, en compétition et surtout et beaucoup en dehors des compétitions, L’agence s’attaque aussi à un phénomène dont nous tardons probablement à prendre conscience, celui du recours par les amateurs adeptes de la culture du corps à des produits apparemment innocents et inoffensifs mais qui peuvent constituer un danger véritable pour la santé notamment des jeunes, souvent inconscients, insoucieux ou mal informés et formés. Le recours à des produits tels que certains compléments alimentaires, d’origine des fois douteuses, constitue un danger de santé publique et c’est pour en informer les populations que l’AMAD a initié la caravane qui sillonne le territoire national pour justement mettre beaucoup d’informations à la portée des jeunes. Prendre des produits d’une certaine nature peut s’avérer extrêmement dangereux avec des répercussions des fois irréversibles pouvant aller à des myopathies graves, des troubles de pression artérielle, des troubles graves de la sexualité et tant d’autres problèmes de santé. C’est dire qu’il ne s’agit pas d’effets secondaires auxquels on pourrait s’accommoder. Le professeur Moulay Ahmed Belimam, secrétaire général de l’AMAD, n’arrête pas de le répéter et d’alerter sur ces dangers d’un autre genre, des dangers des temps modernes. Certains compléments alimentaires comptent dans leurs compositions des stéroïdes anabolisants et autres molécules non autorisées et non admises dans la pratique sportive pour leur nocivité et parce que détournée de leur usage thérapeutique normal. Il s’agit en fait de contourner l’inefficacité des produits de fabrication de base de ses compléments alimentaires en y ajoutant des molécules et composants dont les effets sont connus, par exemple sur le volume musculaire notamment par leurs effets la rétention d’eau. Le volume musculaire, outre la question de l’apparence laisse donner une impression de force, hélas oh combien illusoire. les personnes prenant ces produits, apparemment forts, ne sont même pas aussi forts que la moyenne des personnes non entrainées. Les recherches ont aussi montré le caractère addictif de ces produits ; le consommateur se retrouve ainsi pris dans un engrenage qu’il ne va plus maitriser. Qu'une discipline sportive isolée soit contaminée par le phénomène de dopage, on peut toujours objecter qu'il s'agit d'un fléau que l’on peut possiblement circonscrire. On peut alors prendre des mesures appropriées et corriger l'anomalie. La gravité découle ici du fait que de nombreuses disciplines sportives et pratiques physiques pour ne pas dire toutes sont contaminées. Des jeunes dont l’objet de la pratique n’est pas la compétition ou encore des jeunes qui pratiquent sans la moindre volonté de faire partie du mouvement sportif national sont aujourd’hui victimes insoucieuses de pratiques nocives pour leur santé et illicites vis à vis de la loi. Cela devient préoccupant. Il y a là un problème de santé publique et de mise en œuvre de la loi. S’imposent ainsi des mesures de contrôle des produits suspects, de leur traçabilité et de la nature de leurs composants tout aussi bien que s’impose de débusquer les circuits d’approvisionnement et de la commercialisation frauduleuses. Et il y a urgence. Reste aussi à persévérer dans la voie de la lutte contre les pratiques de dopage car c'est aussi de la triche ; c’est interdit et encadré par les règlements sportifs mais également par la loi. Les consommateurs/utilisateurs de produits et pratiques interdites doivent en être dissuadés. Ceux qui en font la promotion, ceux qui en font commerce, sportifs, dirigeants doivent savoir que c'est à la fois dangereux et illicite. Tous doivent comprendre que c’est une triche inadmissible et qu’il y a au Maroc une loi qui prévoit des punitions sévères pour cette triche-là spécifiquement. Celui ou celle qui se dope, finit toujours par se faire attraper car toute substance introduite dans le corps est détectable. Tous ce que vous mettez dans votre corps à peine consommé laisse des traces ; des traces détectables en laboratoire. La loi aujourd’hui ne punit plus que le sportif en cas de dopage mais également toute personne en relation avec le cas confondu. En 2022, l’AMAD a effectué un total de 919 tests, dont 704 effectués par l’AMAD en qualité d’autorité de contrôle et 215 prélèvements, comme autorité de prélèvement réalisés pour le compte et à la demande d’autres organismes.

blogger.com/blog/posts/924802102...

Aziz Daouda

Directeur Technique et du Développement de la Confédération Africaine d'Athlétisme. Passionné du Maroc, passionné d'Afrique. Concerné par ce qui se passe, formulant mon point de vue quand j'en ai un. Humaniste, j'essaye de l'être, humain je veux l'être. Mon histoire est intimement liée à l'athlétisme marocain et mondial. J'ai eu le privilège de participer à la gloire de mon pays .

9300

33.0

Morocco and the Trust Economy: The Invisible Capital of Development... 220

Aziz Daouda, 10 h.

- Politics - Society - Business -

2.9 min read.

In the economic history of nations, some assets are visible, such as natural resources, geographical position, infrastructure, or market size. Others, however, are invisible but often decisive. Among them, trust holds a central place and constitutes the true cement of sustainable economies. An economy can survive with few natural resources, but it cannot prosper sustainably without trust. Morocco today has many assets: remarkable political stability, a strategic position, world-class infrastructure, and active economic diplomacy. Yet, the decisive step in development now consists of building a true trust economy, capable of sustainably reassuring citizens, entrepreneurs, and investors. This is not a slogan. Trust is an institutional and cultural architecture that is built over time. It is the primary capital of a modern economy and a determining factor. It reduces transaction costs, encourages investment, facilitates innovation, and stimulates individual initiative. When an entrepreneur knows that the rules of the game are stable, that contracts will be respected, and that justice is swift and independent, he invests more easily. When a citizen trusts the tax administration and institutions, he more willingly accepts taxes and participates in the formal economy. Conversely, a lack of trust generates precautionary behaviors: capital flight, informality, low long-term investment. The economy then becomes cautious, fragmented, and inefficient. For Morocco, the central question is therefore not only to attract investments, but to create an environment where trust becomes a collective reflex. It would be unfair not to recognize the considerable progress made over the past decades. The foundations are solid. The country has massively invested in infrastructure: Tanger Med is today one of the world's most important logistics hubs. Nador and Dakhla are coming soon. Industrial zones have enabled the emergence of high-performing sectors, in the automotive industry with Renault Group and Stellantis, and in aeronautics with Boeing, Airbus, and Safran. The country's ambition in energy transition is exemplary. This shows that it is capable of carrying out structuring projects and offering a stable macroeconomic environment. However, the next step in development requires a qualitative leap: moving from an opportunity economy to a trust economy with a determining role for the rule of law. Trust first rests on the solidity of institutions. For investors as for entrepreneurs, the predictability of rules is a decisive element. Laws must be stable, readable, and applied equally, with three particularly crucial dimensions: **The independence and efficiency of justice** A swift, accessible, and credible justice system is the keystone of any trust economy. Commercial disputes must be resolved within reasonable timeframes. Judicial decisions must be enforced without ambiguity. Legal security is often the primary factor of attractiveness. **Fiscal stability** Investors do not necessarily expect very low tax rates; they primarily seek stability and readability. Predictable taxation allows companies to plan investments over the long term. Morocco has already undertaken several major tax reforms, but the challenge now is to go further and consolidate a clear and durable fiscal pact. **The fight against rents and privileges** Trust disappears when the rules of the game seem unequal. A dynamic economy relies on fair competition and equal opportunities. Transparency in public markets, competition regulation, and limiting rent situations are essential levers. A trust economy is also an economy of freedom, capable of unleashing entrepreneurial energy. The freedom to enterprise, innovate, and experiment is one of the fundamental engines of growth. Morocco has a talented youth, competent engineers, and an influential diaspora. However, several obstacles remain: administrative complexity, access to financing for SMEs, slowness of certain procedures. The challenge is to create an environment where individual initiative becomes the norm rather than the exception. Moroccan startups in fintech, artificial intelligence, or agricultural technologies already demonstrate the country's potential. With a more fluid ecosystem, they could become tomorrow's economic champions. In a world marked by geopolitical uncertainty and economic recompositions, trust also becomes a comparative advantage. If Morocco manages to position itself as a country where rules are stable, justice reliable, and administration predictable, it could become one of the main investment platforms between Europe and Africa. This ambition aligns with the Kingdom's African strategies and its growing international openness. Trust could thus become Morocco's true economic hallmark. Several strategic orientations deserve to be prioritized: - Accelerate the modernization of the judicial system, particularly in handling commercial disputes and enforcing judicial decisions. - Radically simplify administrative procedures for businesses through complete digitalization of public services. - Establish multi-year fiscal stability to enhance visibility. - Promote transparency and fair competition in all economic sectors. - Strengthen training and valorization of human capital, particularly in technological and scientific fields. - Develop a culture of trust between the State, businesses, and citizens. This dimension is often overlooked, yet it constitutes the invisible foundation of development. Morocco finds itself today at a pivotal moment in its economic history. The infrastructure is in place, strategic ambitions are affirmed, and the international environment offers new opportunities. The next step therefore consists of building a sustainable trust ecosystem. If Morocco succeeds in this gamble, and it must, it could not only accelerate its development but also become one of the most credible and attractive economies in the emerging world. In the 21st-century global economy, trust is undoubtedly the rarest and most powerful capital.

Football: When Passion Kills the Game in Impunity and Tolerance.. 912

Aziz Daouda, 4 d.

- Society - Sports -

2.7 min read.

Football (Soccer for Americans) is first and foremost a matter of emotions. By its very essence, it is an open-air theater where human passions play out in their rawest, most primal form. It generates joy, anger, pride, humiliation, and a sense of belonging. From the stands of Camp Nou to those of the Diego Armando Maradona Stadium, through the fervor of the Mohamed V sport Complex in Casablanca, the vibrant enclosures of Stade Léopold Sédar Senghor in Dakar, or even the Parc des Princes in Paris, the Vélodrome In Marseille, and the Bernabeu In Madrid, football transcends the mere framework of the game to become a total social phenomenon. But this emotional intensity, which makes football's beauty, also constitutes its danger. For without rigorous regulation, it quickly tips into excess, then into violence. Today, it must be acknowledged that the rules exist, but they are too often circumvented, stripped of their substance, or applied with disconcerting leniency. On the pitches as in the stands, excesses are multiplying: insults toward referees, provocations between players, systematic challenges, physical violence, projectile throwing, pitch invasions, xenophobic remarks, racist offenses. What was once the exception is tending to become a tolerated norm. Astonishingly, we are starting to get used to it. Recent examples are telling. In Spain, in stadiums renowned for their football culture, racist chants continue to be belted out without shame, targeting players like Vinícius Júnior. Most recently, it was the Muslim community that was insulted. And yet, Spain's current football prodigy is Muslim. An overheated crowd that has doubtless forgotten it wasn't so long ago that it was Muslim itself. Among those chanting these remarks, and without a doubt, some still carry the genes of that recent past... In Dakar, just a few days ago, clashes escalated, turning a sports celebration into a scene of chaos. In Italy, incidents involving supporters who invaded the pitch, during a friendly match, no less, endangered players and officials, recalling the dark hours of European hooliganism in the 1980s. These episodes are not isolated; they reflect a worrying normalization of violence in and around stadiums. Even at the highest level of African football, behavioral excesses are becoming problematic. The 2025 Africa Cup of Nations final left a bitter taste. What should have been a moment of celebration for continental football was marred by behaviors contrary to sporting ethics. Pressures on refereeing, excessive challenges, and game interruptions have become commonplace. When a coach manipulates a match's rhythm to influence a refereeing decision, it is no longer strategy but a challenge to the very foundations of the sport. Despite international outrage, the sanctions imposed on teams, clubs, or players involved remain often symbolic, insufficient to eradicate these behaviors. A very surprising phenomenon: rarely have clubs or federations clearly distanced themselves from such crowds. They accommodate them, and when they condemn them, it is half-heartedly, in a muffled, timid tone with no effect. The problem is twofold. On one hand, disciplinary regulations exist but lack firmness. On the other, their application suffers from a lack of consistency and political courage. Bodies like FIFA, continental confederations, and national federations hesitate to impose truly dissuasive sanctions such as point deductions, prolonged closed-door matches, competition exclusions, or even administrative relegations. Yet without fear of sanction, the rule loses all effectiveness. It suffices to compare with other sports to measure the gap. In rugby, for example, respect for the referee is a cardinal value. The slightest challenge is immediately sanctioned. In athletics, a false start leads to immediate disqualification, no discussion. Football, meanwhile, still tolerates too many behaviors that should be unacceptable. This permissiveness has a cost. It undermines football's image, discourages some families from attending stadiums, and endangers the safety of the game's actors. More gravely, it paves the way for future tragedies. History has already taught us, through catastrophes like the Heysel Stadium disaster, that violence in stadiums can have tragic consequences. It is therefore urgent to react. Regulating football does not mean killing its soul, but rather preserving it. It is not about extinguishing passions, but channeling them. This requires strong measures, exemplary sanctions against offending clubs and players, accountability for national federations, increased use of technology to identify troublemakers, and above all, a clear political will from national and international governing bodies. Football cannot continue to be this "market of emotion" left to its own devices. For by tolerating the intolerable, it risks losing what makes its greatness and its ability to unite rather than divide. If FIFA does not decide to act firmly, the danger is real: that of seeing football sink into a spiral where violence triumphs over the game, and where, one day, tragedies exceed the mere framework of sport. The long-awaited decision of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in the 2025 AFCON final case should confirm rigor and integrity in the application of rules, at least at this level, thereby strengthening the credibility of the pan-African competition and football in general.

April 2026 or the Certain Confirmation of the Moroccan Victory... 1091

Aziz Daouda, 5 d.

- World Politics - History -

3 min read.

We are entering a decisive month of April. The international dynamic is shifting even further in Morocco's favor on the Sahara issue. April once again promises to be a pivotal moment in the international handling of the Moroccan Sahara question. This structuring diplomatic ritual corresponds to the presentation of the annual report by the UN Secretary-General's Personal Envoy to the Security Council. But this year, the context is profoundly different. The lines have shifted, balances have been redrawn, and a new dynamic is taking hold, clearly favorable to Morocco, a logical follow-up to the adoption of Resolution 2797, with strong structuring potential. The adoption of this resolution marks an essential milestone. It goes beyond simply renewing the existing framework. It consolidates a political direction initiated over several years, by enshrining the preeminence of a realistic, pragmatic, and sustainable political solution, centered exclusively on the Moroccan autonomy initiative. This resolution fits into a strategic continuity that progressively marginalizes unrealistic options, those that long relied on outdated or inapplicable references in the current geopolitical context. It also increases pressure on the parties to engage in a credible political process under the exclusive auspices of the United Nations, but in reality under strong American pressure. The United States has directly engaged in favor of the Kingdom, with the return of roundtables in Madrid and then Washington as key pivots. These meetings have confirmed a diplomatic reality that is now hard to contest. The format of the gatherings, including Morocco, Mauritania, the Polisario Front, and Algeria despite itself, is the only relevant framework for progress. It implicitly enshrines Algeria's central role, long eager to present itself as a mere observer. Its active participation, even forced, places it at the heart of the dispute, profoundly altering the reading of the conflict and redistributing political responsibilities. Madrid and Washington are not insignificant venues. They reflect the growing involvement of Western powers in seeking a resolution, with increasing convergence around the Moroccan proposal. One of the expected developments this month concerns the future of MINURSO. The time has come to redefine the mission. From its inception, it has never fulfilled the role for which it was established. A major evolution is likely emerging in support of implementing autonomy in the southern provinces within the framework of the Kingdom's sovereignty. Long confined to monitoring the ceasefire, the mission will see its name change and its mandate evolve to adapt to on-the-ground realities and the demands of a renewed political process. Such a change would be highly significant. It would mark the end of UN inertia and reflect the international community's will to move from managing the status quo to an active and definitive resolution logic. Much to the dismay of those who, for 50 years, have done everything to perpetuate the conflict through their proxy; the latter is increasingly suffering from the shifting landscape. Washington has toughened its tone and put the Polisario in its sights. Algeria is evidently feeling the effects. The introduction in the US Congress of a proposal to designate the Polisario as a terrorist organization represents a potentially major turning point. If successful, such a designation would have considerable political, financial, and diplomatic consequences. It would further isolate the movement, weaken its supporters, and reshape the balance of power. Above all, it would reinforce the security reading of the dossier, in a Sahel-Saharan context marked by rising transnational threats. This adds to a Security Council increasingly aligned with the Moroccan position. The Council's current composition clearly leans in favor of Moroccan positions. Several influential members explicitly or implicitly support the autonomy initiative, seen as the most serious and credible basis for settlement. This shift is no accident. It results from active, coherent, and consistent Moroccan diplomacy, which has successfully embedded the Sahara issue within logics of regional stability, counter-terrorism, and economic development. Algeria, for its part, faces its contradictions. In this context, the Algerian regime appears increasingly beleaguered. Its positioning, long structured around ideological rhetoric and systematic opposition to Morocco, now seems out of step with international system evolutions. Algiers' relative diplomatic isolation, including in its Sahelian environment, contrasts with its regional ambitions. Internally, economic and social challenges exacerbate tensions in a country with considerable resources but unevenly distributed benefits. Algerian populations suffer from much injustice and lack the essentials. The Sahara issue, instrumentalized for decades as a lever for foreign policy and internal cohesion, thus reveals the limits of a politically exhausted model. The trend thus confirms a historic turning point depriving the Algerian regime of its artificial political rent. All elements converge toward one conclusion: April 2026 could mark a decisive step in the evolution of the Moroccan Sahara dossier. Without prejudging an immediate outcome, current dynamics are progressively narrowing the space for blocking positions. More than ever, resolving this conflict seems to hinge on recognizing geopolitical realities and adhering to a pragmatic political solution. In this perspective, Morocco appears in a position of strength, bolstered by growing legitimacy and increasingly assertive international support. The question remains whether other actors, particularly Algeria, will adapt to this new reality or choose to oppose it at the risk of greater isolation in a world where balances of power evolve rapidly. There will undoubtedly be a before and after April 2026, and above all, the consolidation of a Moroccan position oriented toward further development of the southern provinces. The Security Council's output is awaited in this direction.