Think Forward.

Science

Reinventing the Moroccan School: From Transmission to Support... 1988

Aziz Daouda, 14 d.
- Politics - Science - Society -
2.7 min read.
Moroccans, especially the youth, today express a deep malaise regarding their school system. They have just manifesté this loudly. This reality, now public, appears both in family discussions and institutional assessments as well as societal debates. To compensate for the shortcomings of a public education seen as exhausted, more and more families, informed or affluent, enroll their children in private, sometimes foreign, institutions. The middle class also makes many sacrifices to follow this movement. This phenomenon reflects a crisis of confidence and deepens the social divide: school, promoted as a driver of equality, becomes a marker of inequality. This drift had already been foreseen: on le 1er novembre 1960, Dean Charles André Julien warned Mr. Bennani, Director of the Royal Protocol, about the risks of a poorly conceived reform that would create new problems. Despite considerable investments, successive reforms have often been limited to peripheral aspects: infrastructure, uniforms, superficial pedagogical approaches, vacation schedules. Too often, they resulted from poorly inspired mimicry, entrusted to careless study offices and insufficiently qualified officials. The various reforms have not succeeded and have generated growing dissatisfaction. School dropout rates and different rankings illustrate this distressing situation. If there must be reform, and the urgency is real, it must not concern buildings, student attire, or vacation schedules but focus on the heart of the curriculum, the educational philosophy, and how to consider the roles of the student and teacher. The future belongs to a world where young people create their own jobs; this trend is becoming universal. We live in an unprecedented period in human history, where youth shape their professional and personal trajectories: young people invent their jobs, build their paths, imagine new social models. Today, a Moroccan teenager, diploma or not, can design an application, launch a business, build a community, influence markets, and create unimaginable value for traditional frameworks. The modèle 1337 perfectly illustrates this. Now, young people no longer have mental borders or limits. They express energy made of ambition, technological intuition, cultural openness, and dreams. Meanwhile, the school system remains locked in a 20th-century pattern. The role of school must evolve: it is no longer about transmitting, but about accompanying. The Moroccan school must stop being a place for reciting knowledge now available online. Information is at hand, even for a ten-year-old child. That is not what they expect: sometimes, they doze off in class and at night find the freedom space where they imagine the world they want to live in and build themselves. In technology and language learning, many of them outpace decision-makers and teachers. Young people master English more than what is offered at school and have technological equipment that schools are far from providing. Parents make huge sacrifices for this. Young people prefer a connection over a meal. Young people no longer like school as it is presented to them. Above all, they expect to find there: - someone who listens to them; - someone who believes in their potential; - someone who urges them to dream bigger, dare more, create; - someone who trusts them. School must thus become a space of support, awakening, and life project construction; it must train citizens capable of imagining, innovating, collaborating, taking risks, not just memorizing. For this, the major challenge for the State is training trainers capable of adapting to new realities. It is essential to move from transmitting teachers to mentoring guides. The true reform therefore begins with teachers. Yesterday’s teachers must adopt the role of mentor, guide, catalyst of talents: a mentor who asks questions instead of imposing answers, a companion who helps the student discover themselves, an educator who opens doors rather than erects walls. Training trainers requires a new philosophy: integrating positive psychology, educational coaching, active pedagogies, project building, digital culture, and creativity. Teaching is no longer a transmission profession but accompaniment, with autonomy as the engine of the future. Today, young people do not need financial capital to start but confidence, ideas, and skills. A good connection makes them happy. Their main asset is their mind. Their obstacle is often a lack of encouragement, anxiety over a system that is too rigid, too vertical, too distant from their reality. They are capable of everything except believing in themselves alone. This is where school must intervene, becoming the cocoon where innovative ideas and projects emerge. But to succeed, there must be the political courage to undertake the great reform awaited by youth. Morocco has a historic opportunity to reinvent its education system, not by material renovation, but through intellectual and spiritual transformation. School must become the place for building dreams, accompanying ambitions, and preparing for life through innovation and creation. It must train individuals capable not only of adapting to a changing world but of transforming it a world moving faster than previous generations could imagine. The true reform is the spark, not the concrete. It embodies not walls but minds. It builds not in the past but in the future that our youth aspire to invent, supported by our trust, nothing more.

Managing Science is not a numbers game 4911

Tariq Daouda, 2 mon.
More people in science does not necessarily mean better results: there is an equilibrium to find, a sweet spot. There is a fundamental difference between technology, industry and science. In an industrial setting, production is mostly defined by how many units of production you have, and how much ressources are available for production. As long as input ressources are available, you can in theory scale production somewhat geometrically. Double the number of factories, double the output. Science works differently. Historically groundbreaking scientific discoveries and theories have been made in times of small tight knit communities. The most famous example being the iconic photograph from the Fifth Solvay Conference in 1927, held in Brussels, often referred to as "the most intelligent photo of all time". All the great minds that defined modern physics from relativity to quantum mechanics fit in one single photograph. In science, instruments are not the means of production, they are the tools used to assess theories. Doubling the money and the people does not imply doubling the output. Science is not about producing stuff it's about producing new ideas. Science thrives when highly intelligent individuals, extremely passionate about a single topic, get to meet to exchange often and freely over a long period of time. A hyper focused kernel driven by a similar passion. Adding more people dilutes the potential of highly meaningful interactions. That's the first reason why more people can lead to less groundbreaking discoveries. Even if the constituents of that kernel exists, it can never crystallized and reach it's full potential. Too many people to talk to, too many papers to read and too many unaligned objectives. This also promotes the apparition of dogmatism and "consensus thinking". When there are too many ideas to assess, it is tempting to go with what the majority thinks. However for science, freedom is more important than consensus. Consensus is a political tool used by human beings to govern themselves in matters of opinions. This is irrelevant to science because science is empirical. It doesn't matter how many people think something if it can be demonstrated to be false. Freedom of thought, on the other hand is the essential mechanism that keeps on generating new ideas and points of view. A necessary part of scientific development.

Video Games and Aggression: How Trustworthy Is the Research? 4792

Exodia04, 2 mon.
- Science - Society -
1.5 min read.
"The Effect of Video Game Competition and Violence on Aggressive Behavior" by Adachi and Willoughby (2011) is one of the most frequently cited studies in the literature on video game violence. Its credibility can be partially attributed to the fact that it is published by the American Psychological Association (APA), a highly reputable organization in the field of psychology. The researchers picked video games with similar levels of difficulty and speed but varying degrees of violence and competitiveness. These four metrics were evaluated in a pilot study in which participants briefly played each game and rated them on a seven-point scale. The researchers then conducted two experiments: - **Experiment 1:** The violent game chosen was Conan, an action game involving combat with swords and axes, while the nonviolent game was Fuel, a racing game. Both games were considered similarly competitive based on the pilot study. Participants were randomly assigned to play either Conan or Fuel. The experiment aimed to test whether violent content alone would lead to greater aggression after gameplay. The findings showed no significant differences in aggressive behavior between players of the violent and nonviolent games. However, the main concern with this finding is in its measure. The aggression was measured by having participants choose the amount and spiciness of hot sauce to give to another person who dislikes spicy food. A measure that does not fully capture the complexity of what aggressive behavior is. - **Experiment 2:** They selected 4 games: Mortal Kombat vs DC Universe (Violent and competitive), Left 4 Dead 2 (Violent but less competitive), Fuel (Nonviolent and competitive), and Marble Blast Ultra (Nonviolent and less competitive). The researchers found that competitiveness in video games, rather than violent content, significantly increased "aggressive" behavior. They measured it by having participants compete in a reaction-time button-press game against an opponent. When a player lost a round, the winner had control over the intensity and duration of an unpleasant noise blast delivered to the loser. The participant’s choice of how loud and how long to set the noise blast served as a proxy for aggressive behavior. Blasting the noise could indicate other motivations besides aggression, such as opponent intimidation to win the game, compliance with experimental expectations, or could have to do with the impulse management of the participant. Once again, the measure fails to reflect the multifaceted nature of aggression. Research papers like these shape the opinions of a significant portion of the public regarding the link between video games and violence, which raises the important question of how well such studies capture the true complexity of aggression and whether their findings should be featured in such reputable journals and directly influence public perception.
apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/v...

Techbio x Africa: Early Movers - part3 5492

Kamil Seg, 2 mon.
- Technology - Science -
3.2 min read.
Early Signs, Real Ventures It's one thing to say the infrastructure and talent are here but the real test is whether it yields actual companies.  And the signs are already showing. A new class of TechBios is taking shape, raising money, and doing the first thing every good TechBio does: … drum roll, you should know it by now…  Building proprietary datasets. The support system is forming too. OneBio, a Cape Town venture studio, closed a $47M Series A to back founders at the biology–technology edge.  Villgro Africa in Nairobi has already incubated 40+ health and life science startups and unlocked $18M in follow-on capital. These are strides stimulate the Techbio ecosystem and in part, to close Africa's translation gap with venture tools. And the startups coming out of this wave are telling. I thought I would share my personal pick here. Start-ups I can map on the playbook trajectory. Yemaachi Biotech in Ghana raised $3M from YC, Tencent, and LoftyInc to build the world's most diverse cancer knowledge base, sequencing samples across the continent to power precision oncology. As founder Yaw Bediako put it:  "We're looking at trying to understand cancer in the African diaspora - African American, Black British, and continental Africans - the first initiative of its scale. You can't say you're studying a disease if you don't include the most diverse population on the planet, which is the Black population."  BioCertica in South Africa, backed by Pronexus and the Gates Foundation's I3 program with a $2.2M seed, runs consumer genetic tests but is really playing the long game of building the first African polygenic risk database.  And Bixbio, part of OneBio's portfolio and an Illumina Accelerator graduate, assembled the largest reference dataset ever from Southern Africa, nearly 400 high-quality genomes across eight ethno-linguistic groups. Even newcomers like Pandora Biosciences are starting on the same path, building chronic disease datasets designed for drug discovery. And just this summer, the signal got even stronger. In June 2025, Revna Biosciences, a Ghanaian precision medicine startup, announced a landmark partnership with AstraZeneca. Within months, EGFR (gene coding for cell growth protein) biomarker testing integrated into Ghanaian cancer centers, oncologists trained in precision protocols, and the rollout of one of AstraZeneca's targeted therapies for lung cancer patients.  For a sub-Saharan market that has historically had near-zero access to this kind of precision oncology, that's nothing short of historic.  As Revna's CEO Dr. Derrick Edem Akpalu put it:  "This collaboration exemplifies how a synergized biomedical ecosystem such as RevnaBio's can help address long-standing institutional voids that have limited access to advanced molecular diagnostics and targeted therapies in this region."  It's a textbook case of a TechBio going from data and diagnostics to being a direct bridge for global Pharma into Africa. None of this is random. Data-first plays are the starting point of TechBio always.  In the West, consumer genomics followed the same arc: 23andMe built a database of 15M genomes, went bankrupt, and still got snapped up in 2025 by Regeneron for $256M because Pharma wanted the dataset.  Tempus, sitting on 20 petabytes of oncology data, signed a $160M licensing deal with Recursion to train AI models for biomarker discovery and patient stratification.  The lesson is obvious: even before a molecule is in sight, the data itself is valuable enough to Pharma. Africa's first TechBios are now running that playbook and they're doing it from the most diverse human dataset on the planet. The Stakes for Africa x TechBio Case Study: 54gene - The Right Start, The Wrong Turn 54gene was supposed to be Africa’s genomics moonshot. Founded in 2019 by Dr. Abasi Ene-Obong, the company set out to fix the glaring gap where less than 3% of global genomic data came from Africans despite the continent holding the greatest genetic diversity on earth. Backed by Y Combinator, Adjuvant Capital, and Cathay AfricInvest, it raised $45M across three rounds and quickly became the poster child for African TechBio. The model at first was exactly what you’d expect from a good TechBio: start with the data. 54gene partnered with 10 of Nigeria’s largest hospitals, built a biobank that grew past 100,000 patient samples, and focused on high-value cohorts like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and sickle cell. This was the right first play: position as an enabler for hospitals and research centers, pile up proprietary datasets, and generate revenue through paid Pharma collaborations. In other words, service-led first, platform-led later — the same arc followed by U.S. genomics pioneers like 23andMe. Then came COVID. 54gene pivoted into diagnostics, scaling mobile labs and at one point driving Nigeria’s daily testing capacity from 100 to over 1,000. Revenues spiked — over $20M from COVID testing — but the pivot also pulled the company away from its core playbook. Instead of doubling down on turning its biobank into translational insights with AI, it spun up Seven Rivers Labs, a costly diagnostics arm. The bets didn’t pay off. By 2022, as COVID demand collapsed, 54gene was caught between a fading diagnostics business and a stalled genomics mission. Layoffs, valuation cuts, and boardroom fights followed. In 2023 the company shut down operations; by 2025, its assets, including the biobank of 100,000 Nigerian genomes were up for sale at just $3M, before a Lagos court froze the deal amid lawsuits between founder and investors. The story matters because it shows how fragile the trajectory can be. Imagine if instead of diagnostics, 54gene had invested its datasets into AI models to map dosage differences for African populations, identify new drug targets, or partner on stratified clinical trials. That’s the road from platform to assets, the road that makes a TechBio a unicorn. Dr. Ene-Obong seems to agree. His new company, Syndicate Bio, is now doubling down on the same thesis but with AI built in from day one partnering on cancer genomics in Nigeria and aiming to turn Africa’s diversity into global drug discovery. It’s the continuation of the playbook 54gene set in motion, but with the missing piece restored.

TechBio x Africa Manifesto: The Edge - part2 5298

Kamil Seg, 2 mon.
- Technology - Science -
2.7 min read.
In Africa The Bottleneck Was Always Here And Now There a Real drivers for change Translation is now recognized as the great bottleneck of drug discovery worldwide. But in Africa, it has always been the bottleneck.  Not in developing drugs, but in applying them.  Most medicines were discovered and validated elsewhere, then imported with little understanding of how African populations would metabolize or respond to them. The result is a structural mismatch: Africa accounts for 18% of the global population and 20% of the disease burden, yet fewer than 3% of clinical trials take place on the continent, most of them concentrated in South Africa and Egypt. This gap is not trivial. Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (the ADME framework) are heavily influenced by genetic variants, especially in liver enzymes like CYP-450, which remain poorly characterized in African populations.  In theory, Africa's extraordinary genetic diversity should have been a global advantage for understanding variability in drug safety and efficacy. In practice, it was ignored.  As Professor Kelly Chibale of the University of Cape Town has argued:  "If you really want to have confidence in a clinical trial, it must start in Africa. Why? If it works in Africa, there's a good chance it'll work somewhere else, because there is such huge genetic diversity." Then came COVID-19. The pandemic was a turning point, mobilizing governmental, NGO, and international funding to build sequencing labs, train scientists, and set up data infrastructure.  In my opinion, the Africa Pathogen Genomics Initiative (Africa PGI) became emblematic of this shift.  The first 10,000 SARS-CoV-2 genomes from Africa took 375 days; the next 10,000 just 87 days; the following 10,000 only 24 days. Today, all 54 African countries have sequencing capacity, and African scientists identified two of the world's five variants of concern.  For the first time, Africa showed it could operate at global pace when given the tools. These investments were catalytic and revealed what had long been latent:  Africa is not just a recipient of medicines but a potential engine of translational science.  The infrastructure layer, built with public and philanthropic support (like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), is now enabling a broader ecosystem: regulatory frameworks like the Africa CDC and the African Medicines Agency, scientific hubs such as H3D in Cape Town, and new hardware capacity supported by corporates like Thermo Fisher's Centre for Innovative Research in South Africa. From here, the snowball is rolling. What began with genomics is already extending across the translational stack. In Ghana, new medicinal chemistry capacity has positioned the country as only the second on the continent (after South Africa) able to run early-stage compound design, linked into the pan-African Drug Discovery Accelerator. This is big, because the continent can now de-risk potential assets. Pharma is of course watching closely. Roche's African Genomics Program is sequencing tens of thousands of African genomes through local biobanks. Sanofi's partnership with DNDi shows how compounds de-risked in Africa can enter global pipelines.  And demographics strengthen the logic: Africa's population is set to nearly double by 2050, while non-communicable diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer will become leading causes of death by 2030 which is the same conditions driving Pharma pipelines worldwide. The Continent Is Full Of Bright Tech Minds But data infrastructure alone is not enough; translation also depends on whether there is talent capable of making sense of the data.  COVID revealed this too: it was an African-born (Tunisia) AI company, InstaDeep, that helped BioNTech build the Early Warning System able to flag >90% of WHO-designated SARS-CoV-2 variants an average of two months before their official classification.  The company had already been working with BioNTech on personalized cancer vaccines, and post-acquisition it continues to run as an independent AI lab powering BioNTech's drug discovery, improving AlphaFold-like protein folding in immunology to designing next-generation mRNA cancer vaccines.  The $700 million acquisition in 2023 was not only the largest AI deal outside the U.S. at the time, but also a watershed moment for the continent. As co-founder Karim Beguir put it in a recent podcast interview:  "our initial motive was to prove that young Tunisians, young Africans could innovate and compete at the highest level" The significance goes beyond one company.  It validated Africa's AI talent density, which is being built from the ground up through grassroots, community-led efforts. Initiatives like Masakhane, a volunteer-driven movement advancing natural language processing for African languages, or Deep Learning Indaba, cited globally as a model for how to mobilize a continent around machine learning, are emblematic of this bottom-up energy.  I saw it myself at Applied Machine Learning Days Africa 2024 in Nairobi, where more than 3,000 participants gathered across three days mostly researchers, innovators, and students taking responsibility for local problems and showing how AI can answer them.  This effort-led culture is now being matched with hardware too infrastructure. Microsoft has launched its first Azure cloud region in South Africa, enabling GPU-grade compute to stay on the continent, while Nvidia and Cassava are building an AI factory in Johannesburg, with expansions planned for Kenya, Egypt, Morocco, and Nigeria.
medium.com/@kamil.seg/feea16383b...

Techbios x Africa : The manifesto part 1 5232

Kamil Seg, 2 mon.
- Technology - Science -
2.7 min read.
Closer to Humans: The Next Big Opportunity in TechBio: Hitting Eroom's law in translating assets to clinics If Moore's law promises exponential gains from technology, Eroom's law (Moore spelled backwards) reminds us that drug discovery has stubbornly resisted that curve. For decades, the cost of bringing a new drug to market has roughly doubled every nine years, even as compute and data scaled exponentially. AI-driven TechBios were supposed to break this trend and accelerate discovery, lower costs, and flood the pipeline with new medicines. In its early day's, Recursion was going with something like a 100 drugs in 10 years. And to some extent, they have delivered. Programs from Insilico or Recursion show how AI can compress preclinical timelines from five years down to 18–30 months. Costs are lower, throughput is higher, and in silico tools have expanded the space of molecules Pharma can explore.  But reality is that most AI-first drugs are still aimed at well-known targets, and once they reach the clinic, they face the same bottlenecks as traditionally developed drugs. Phase II proof-of-concept success rates hover at ~40%, unchanged. Back to Eroom's law in action, the bottleneck has shifted downstream. The graph from speed invest tells the story nicely. Early discovery (target validation, compound screening, lead optimization) accounts for ~25% of costs, the bulk of time and money is lost in Phase II and Phase III, where failure rates spike and costs per molecule can exceed 20–25% of the total. Functional Data Is the Missing Piece Why? Because our translational models are still inadequate proxies for human biology. Drugs fail not because they weren't optimized enough in silico, but because they don't behave as expected in humans, showing weak efficacy, unexpected toxicity, or adverse effects that outweigh benefits.  Conversely regulators are now pushing for more personalized approaches: genotyping, deeper disease phenotyping, and companion biomarkers to better stratify patients. That means the next opportunity isn't about yet another molecule generator. It's about building the translation layer: generating functional, human-relevant data at scale.  Two pillars stand out: Bench side. New experimental systems like organoids and organ-on-a-chip can capture human biology more faithfully than animal models, giving us early readouts of drug response in tissue that resembles real patients. it can be high-dimensional functional data (cells content imaging) Bedside. Richer molecular profiling of patients to capture complete responses to interventions across all biological layers. The omics data, reflects physiological responses from the gene expressed to the protein inhibited till the end metabolite produced. This is the frontier TechBios have yet to tackle.  Proprietary datasets from in vitro, in vivo, or in silico work aren't enough, because by design they remain at a distance from real human complexity.  Reminder, the demand is still there as the patent cliffs of 2030 are not going anywhere. The Funding Gap: Bench Traction, Bedside Wide Open The common denominator in TechBio is always the same: proprietary datasets. On the bench side, we're already seeing how this can play out. Just last month, Parallel Bio raised $21 million to push forward a new model for immune drug discovery. Their platform combines organoids and AI is set to generate massive proprietary datasets of immune responses. This 'Immune system in a dish' allows simulate how drugs behave across populations and verify candidates in vitro before they ever enter the clinic. The company dates back to 2021, but recent series A show their gearing up for growth and points to serious answers to the translation problems from Capital Interest. The story on the bedside is very different. Here, the prerequisite is well-characterized patient data of omics like genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, deep clinical phenotyping. Not really the type of data you can engineer in your lab with enough wetware and hardware. Pharma companies guard their clinical trials data as part of their asset. Biobanks have the scale needed but primarily share it with research partners and academics or monetizes them directly, selling access to screened samples and metadata at high prices. Their funded by goverments and charitable organizations around projects with defined partners within a consortio that have their for privilege access.  Hospitals typically generate only small, fragmented cohorts a few hundred patients, often disease-specific and far from the scale needed to train robust models.  And once TechBios push into later stages like preclinical or Phase I, costs spike: recruiting patients, managing trial sites, and running protocols and more tailored to big Pharma economics.  In the West, shrinking patient pools for many chronic diseases add yet another barrier driving the cost further up. This imbalance explains why most visible TechBio innovation so far has come from the bench. Benchside players like Parallel Bio are proving you can generate your own data and own the feedback loop.  On the bedside, by contrast, barriers remain high and that leaves the space wide open.  The real question is not if bedside innovation will emerge, but where. And it may well be that the answer lies outside the traditional Pharma hubs
medium.com/@kamil.seg/feea16383b...

TechBios: The Playbook 5053

Kamil Seg, 2 mon.
- Technology - Science -
2.8 min read.
The SaaS Playbook Enters Pharma At start, TechBios bore the heavy upfront costs of architecture design, large-scale data acquisition, massive training runs, and inference, all to learn new principles in biology and deliver them as platforms Pharma clients could use for better drug design. This unlock was driven by compounding forces. On the tech side, models improved as they scaled in size and input, while compute and storage costs fell (Moore's Law at work). On the bio side, labs and instruments achieved higher throughput, producing exponentially more data at lower cost - the Carlson Curve in genetics being the best-known example. (Sequencing your whole genome cost ~$10 million in 2007; ten years later, it was under $1,000.) On the demand side, techBios emerged at a time when the status quo relied on rule-based computational methods grounded in rigid theoretical models. These could only handle a limited set of parameters, making it difficult to experiment broadly and ultimately constraining R&D pipeline output. Put in perspective, the stakes of this inefficiency are massive: 69 blockbusters will face patent cliffs by 2030, putting around 236 bio USD at risk. As Manuel Grossmann the Founding Partner of Amino Collective (Health x Bio Fund in Europe), notes: "The TechBio space benefits from two fundamental tailwinds: technological advancement and market demand." For tech investors, the story clicked. These companies weren't tied to one risky therapeutic bet; they looked like horizontal software platforms that could scale across the entire industry. TechBios offered Pharma innovation closer with simpler unit economics clean, recurring revenues, faster adoption curves. As Cradle, using language models for protein design puts it: "One annual software license. No hidden fees." No surprise then that capital rushed in. In 2021, right at the cusp of this wave, VC investment in TechBios hit $2.4 billion, with mega-rounds north of $100M backing the promise of programmable biology. … Opposed To The Longstanding Asset Deal Until then, most real Pharma innovation was coming from a fundamentally different breed of companies with a focus much narrower and longer time horizons for product market fit. Biotech companies select a well-studied biological target, develop a molecule against it, and march it through the clinical gauntlet. Their path to value creation is very interactive, reducing uncertainty every step of the way and focusing where prior knowledge give a fighting chance.  Their revenues are therefore less predictable, making take asymmetric bets requiring incredibly specialized knowledge and experience. Headlines in the domain are hence quite binary. You get the 1 trio USD added Market Cap to Novo from from the GLP-1 of Embark and or failures of expected block busters for Alzheimers. Pharma companies are in that sense expert in M&A deals for to power their innovation, estimated 65% of its revenue come from these operations. The size of deals made here are often quite substantial, getting back to Car T in the 2010, Roche bought Poseida Therapeutics, a San Diego-based for US $1.5 billion November last year. … Moving into Co-Development And Blurring The Lines As the TechBio field matured, one lesson became clear: benchmarks alone aren't enough.  Validation metrics carefully crafted to showcase model performances gets the initial traction but Pharma ultimately values assets, and without them TechBios struggle to show true impact.  The economic logic makes the difference obvious. A pure platform play might reach a few hundred million in enterprise value. But the real butter in this industry sits with assets, Pharma's trillion-dollar market cap rests on drugs that make it through the clinic. Without assets, TechBios miss the home run and risk falling outside the venture playbook entirely. This is what pushed the industry toward co-development. Instead of selling platforms as tools, TechBios began striking deals that shared both risk and upside: upfronts, milestone payments, royalties. Late exemple of this is Creyon Bio AI signing 1 bio USD in milestone deal with Lilly. As Manuel Grossmann of Amino Collective puts it again: "Focusing purely on providing tools as products or services can often be challenging, since the exit potential tops out in the low hundreds of millions - often misaligned with the VC model." This is where the difference between Techbio and Biotechs gets blurry. As the former starts developing their own drug running validation, toxicity and even clinical to out-license as assets, the latter becomes more and more tech enabled and building with open source models from industry like RosettaFold. The TechBio Playbook Has Emerged On top of that comes the platform. This is where raw data turns into usable insight. In Recursion's case, it's the RecursionOS, an operating system for biology that fuses automated labs with ML models to map complex biology. That's what Pharma pays for. The economics here look like $150M upfronts, R&D milestones, tiered royalties, exactly the Roche and Genentech partnership structure. At this stage, platforms prove they can de-risk discovery for others. But the real prize sits in assets. Once the platform works, you push it into your own drug programs: new targets, new molecules, lead optimization.  This is where TechBios flip into biotech economics. Out-licensing assets to Pharma brings upfronts plus large milestone packages, and potentially royalties if the drug hits the market. It's higher risk, but it's also where exits climb from hundreds of millions into the billions. That's the sequence: data → platform → assets.
medium.com/included-vc/techbio-x...

TechBio, A few definitions 4921

Kamil Seg, 2 mon.
- Technology - Science -
3.3 min read.
 Why AM I Writing This? I did not come to TechBio as a distant observer but grew into it. When I was studying life sciences engineering, the early signs of "software eating bio" were just starting to appear. Computational tools were making dents in how biology was done, and for me it was impossible not to be fascinated. Fast forward a few years, and I am now operator inside a TechBio startup (shameless plug) leading AI development. That vantage point is really a strange mix. Some days I get swept up in the hype, convinced the next model drop is going to change everything; other days, the scientist in me wants to push back, to ask for proof, for data, for translation into the clinic. Balancing those two minds: both the early adopter and the skeptic is hard. But it's also what makes TechBio such a fascinating space to build in. And then there's Africa. Coming from the diaspora, I studied and trained abroad, where most of the breakthroughs and AI-driven advances in drug discovery were happening in the West But I kept asking myself: what about here? What about my continent? At first, it felt like we were always on the receiving end of innovations born elsewhere. But as I dug deeper, I realized something the very bottlenecks I was seeing firsthand inside TechBio like the gaps in translation, the missing data closer to humans, well that is were exactly where Africa holds an unfair advantage. That's what this deep dive is about. Not a hype piece, not a catalog of every new startup, but an attempt to map the playbook, show where TechBio has already delivered, and point to the next frontier → one that may well be written in Africa. If you're an investor, I want you to come away with clarity on what makes a TechBio defensible, where the real opportunities lie, and why the continent is positioned for outsized returns. If you're a scientist, founder, or operator, you'll find the logic of the playbook, examples of what works (and what doesn't), and maybe a spark for your own next venture. The full story starts just ahead. But first, let's look at the latest wave, AI agents and what they tell us about how fast new technology moves from silicon into cells. TL;DR TechBio has gone from hype to playbook: data → platform → assets. The next bottleneck is translation: generating data closer to humans. Africa holds the unfair advantage to solve this, thanks to its diversity, newly acquired infrastructure, and emerging research ecosystem. Companies are already being built on this frontier, clear venture opportunities exist, exemples of exits and more investors should catch up. Not TechBio Yet But Another Reminder Pharma Can't Escape the Tech Cycle I f you want to know where the next disruption in pharma will show up, follow the broader tech cycle. Every new wave of technology now leaves its mark on the industry. In the age of Tech x Bio, there's nonstop traffic between silicon and cells: cloud, machine learning, robotics and now, AI Agents. I see this almost daily. My feed is flooded whenever a new model drops or a product launches. At first it feels like a headline meant only for the tech crowd. But give it a few months, and suddenly that "just another AI update" is wired into pharma workflows with Paul Hudson, CEO of Sanofi, giving full interview to McKinsey on how transformative it is for the industry. One thing is clear: whether in discovery, trials, or manufacturing, the two domains have become inseparable. A nice review on comes straight out of MIT to help bring perspective. YC's (famous startup incubator from San Francisco) track record makes this pattern visible. They were early to back today's main players when skeptics thought they had it figured out. Companies like Ginkgo Bioworks and Atomwise (more on them later) proved computation could be foundational to biotech and Pharma. Now YC is backing AI Agent startups, showing once again how quickly a new stack of technology crosses into Pharma. And if you thought leaders like Hudson were just posturing as "tech-savvy" with hyped tools, consider Benchling. One of the most established TechBio incumbents, it recently acquired Sphynx, an AI-agent startup focused on streamlining hypothesis generation and analytics in discovery. By weaving these capabilities into its stack, Benchling reinforced that this isn't a passing experiment, it's another layer becoming part of the system. Now, let's be clear. AI Agent companies are not "TechBios" in the sense of this deep dive. They are, for now, tools or orchestration engines that Pharma teams can plug in to augment their workforce and automate tasks once dauntingly manual (and there are many, sometimes not the once you expect… like procurement). They represent the kind of technological spark that helps scale approaches to well-known problems in drug discovery. And while every new wave of technology makes a dent in Pharma, the hundred billion unlocks usually lie elsewhere, closer to solving the big bottlenecks of how drugs are discovered, tested, and developed. That's where TechBios come in, and where we'll turn next. For now, think of this section as the apéro: the first cracker to show how the rules of the game have changed. How TechBios Create (and Capture) Value If you perplexity (we don't "Google" anymore in the age of AI) the definition of TechBio, you'll either get flooded with abstract jargon that means little if you're not steeped in the field, or a description so simple it could apply to almost anything. Neither helps much. A more pragmatic lens is to look at TechBios through their value proposition. And this is where it gets interesting. TechBios have been around for over a decade, and in that time their offerings and therefore their positioning in the industry have shifted dramatically. A more pragmatic lens is to look at TechBios through their value proposition. And this is where it gets interesting. TechBios have been around for over a decade, and in that time their offerings and therefore their positioning in the industry have shifted dramatically.
medium.com/included-vc/techbio-x...

The 4 Choices of Morpheus and what it teaches about human psychology 4757

Tariq Daouda, 2 mon.
- Science - Philosophy - Realist -
0.9 min read.
An iconic scene from an iconic movie. Two men sitting face to face in a abandoned hotel. Each one on a red leather, luxurious Chesterfield-style armchair. A ridiculously small coffee table between them. The scene is dimly lit and outside a storm is raging. The move Morpheus speaks and the more Neo leans forward. Enthralled by the story, by the mystery being revealed. Morpheus leans forward, extending his hands: "This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill—the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill—you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Remember, all I'm offering is the truth. Nothing more." Slowly he opens each hand, revealing the translucent pills. Take the blue pill an stay as you are, take the red pill and attain gnosis. Knowledge of the true reality of things. The deal is irresistible. However, as there seem to be only two choices. In reality there are 4: take the blue pill, take the right pill, take both pills and take none. The last two did not occur to Neo, as they did not occur to the audience. The scene, the monologue is perfectly crafted. With his words and delivery Morpheus created a box for Neo's mind and the audience. A limited set of reality in which to think. We will never know what would you have happened if Neo had just walked away. Morpheus was selling the red pill, and he executed the prefect sell. Thinking outside of the box often means refusing to get boxed-in in the first place.
youtu.be/zE7PKRjrid4

AI: The fallacy of the Turing Test 4097

Tariq Daouda, 3 mon.
The Turing test is simple to understand. In a typical setup, a human judge engages in text-based conversations with both a human and a machine, without knowing which is which, and must determine which participant is the machine. If the judge cannot reliably tell them apart based solely on their conversational responses, the machine is said to have passed the test and demonstrated convincing human-like intelligence. This is convenient, it perfectly avoids facing the hard questions such as defining intelligence and consciousness. Instead, it lays out a basic naive test founded on an ontological fallacy: it's not because something is perceived as something else that it is that thing. The most evident critique of the Turing Test is embedded into the fundementals of Machine Learning itself: - The model is not the modeled. It remains an approximation however precise it is. A simple analogy makes the ontological fallacy clear. It's like going to a magic show, seeing a table floating above the ground and believing that the levitation really happened. How many bits of information separate a real human from a chatting bot? Assuming the number is exactly 0, without any justification, is an extraordinary naive claim. Interestingly, the Turing Test also greatly fails at defining so called super-Intelligence. A super Intelligent machine would evidently fail the test by simply providing super-intelligent answers. Unless it decides to fool the experimenter, in which case it could appear as anything it desires rendering the test meaningless. Regarding modern LLMs, the veil is already faling. LLMs have quircks, like an oversuage of em-dashes. A strange features that is indicative of something potentially pathological in the way the models are trained. These strange dashes would have been expected if a majority of people were using them. However it so happens that hardly anyone knows how to find them on their keyboard. This proves that LLMs are not following the manifold of human writing and suggests the existence of other bisases. Finally, embedded inside the promotion of the Turing test is often a lazy ontological theory of materialism that stipulates that consciousness is not fundamental but a byproduct of matter. Often negating it's existence altogether: It's not that consciousness can be faked, or that it is the result of computations, the understanding is that consciousness does not exist. It is an illusion that takes over the subject of the experience. Again a theory of convenience, based on little justification that produces a major paradox: Who is conscious of the illusion of consciousness?

[Science #4] Precision Nutrition: Tailoring Your Diet Beyond Hunger and Excess 13945

Fatima Zahra EL hajji (Tima EL), 4 mon.
- Science - Health -
1.8 min read.
- Science Series -
Hunger and dietary excess may seem like opposite ends of the spectrum, yet both can undermine health. Too few calories disrupt essential physiological processes and energy metabolism, while chronic overeating—especially of nutrient-poor foods—can drive metabolic dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and raise the risk of long-term diseases. Ironically, consuming more nutrients than needed often fails to meet the body’s precise biochemical demands, accelerating cellular wear and potentially shortening lifespan. Emerging research suggests that certain calorie-dense foods, when consumed carelessly, may harm healthspan—the number of healthy years lived. Conversely, mindful nutrient intake—or even periods of moderate hunger—can sometimes benefit overall physiology more than habitual overeating. The key lies in recognizing that each individual’s nutritional needs are unique. This is the foundation of Precision Nutrition. **From "One-Size-Fits-All" to Tailored Nutrition** The term “precision” is often associated with medicine, where a treatment is matched to a patient’s genetic profile instead of relying on a standard prescription. That same philosophy is now transforming the way we think about food. Personalized nutrition moves beyond outdated dietary guidelines by using your genetic makeup, lifestyle, and preferences to determine which foods serve your body best. Your DNA might reveal, for example, that you absorb certain vitamins inefficiently, or that specific foods help stabilize your blood sugar more effectively. This approach empowers you to make dietary choices tailored to your biology—not to fleeting trends. **How Does It Work?** It starts with a DNA sample, analyzed for hundreds of tiny genetic variations known as polymorphisms. These influence traits like lactose intolerance, vitamin D absorption, caffeine metabolism, and sensitivity to salt or sugar. Using advanced algorithms, nutrition scientists translate this data into actionable diet strategies. For instance: - If your genes show low omega-3 absorption, your plan might emphasize fatty fish, flaxseed, or targeted supplements. - If you metabolize caffeine slowly, reducing coffee intake could help avoid sleep problems or anxiety. One striking example comes from the GC gene, which affects how well your body raises blood vitamin D levels after supplementation. People with certain GC variants may require more sunlight exposure or higher supplement doses to achieve optimal health. The power of personalized nutrition lies in decoding the relationship between your genes and every bite you take—turning food into a truly personal form of medicine. A comprehensive understanding of each individual’s unique nutritional needs—driven by genetic, metabolic, microbiome, and lifestyle factors—enables the development of personalized dietary interventions that have transformative potential far beyond individual health. Precision nutrition not only enhances quality of life and healthspan but also offers a pathway to optimize resource use and address global challenges such as hunger and malnutrition. Emerging perspectives highlight that precision nutrition, while often associated with high-income countries, is increasingly seen as a vital strategy to democratize health and tailor nutrition recommendations for entire populations, including those in low- and middle-income countries where malnutrition and food insecurity remain urgent issues. By leveraging advanced technologies and data-driven diagnostics, precision nutrition can target specific micronutrient deficiencies, metabolic conditions, and even genetic variations prevalent in different communities. This targeted approach moves beyond generic dietary guidelines, allowing for more effective, culturally relevant, and sustainable interventions that better meet the biochemical and physiological demands of diverse populations.

The Sevenfold Constitution of the Human Being 14145

Tupan, 4 mon.
Several esoteric traditions believe that the human being is not limited to a single body of flesh and blood, but instead exists as a amalgam of seven interpenetrating bodies, each vibrating at a distinct frequency and corresponding to a unique level of consciousness. This constitution in layers forms a bridge between the material and the divine, mapping the soul’s descent into matter and its potential ascent back to the source. The physical body is the most tangible and material of the seven. It serves as the vessel through which the soul experiences the physical world, bound by the laws of biology, space, and time. It is composed of flesh, bone, and matter, but it does not exist in isolation. Its vitality is sustained by subtle forces, and without these, it would be inert. The physical body is the site of sensation and action, allowing the soul to manifest its will within the temporal realm. The etheric body, also known as the vital or pranic body, underlies and interpenetrates the physical form. It is made of subtle life-energy and functions as the blueprint or energetic matrix that maintains the structure and function of the material body. It is through this body that prana, chi, or life-force flows, animating tissues, regulating health, and forming the auric field sometimes noticed by those with psychic sensitivity. It connects the material to the immaterial, serving as a bridge between body and soul. The astral body governs emotion, desire, and imagination. It is the seat of passions, instincts, and inner images, and it serves as the vehicle for dreams and psychic experiences. This is the body that travels in the dream state or in altered states of consciousness and is central to experiences of astral projection. It has a more fluid consistence than that of the etheric, and it responds instantly to emotional impulses, making it the most volatile and reactive of the subtle bodies. The mental body is the domain of thought, cognition, and reason. It is often divided into two components: the lower mental body, which takes part in concrete thinking, memory, and logic, and the higher mental body, which perceives abstract truths, archetypes, and universal principles. Through the mental body, we develop self-awareness, belief systems, and discernment. It is through the improvement of this body that the ego begins to dissolve, allowing thought to serve truth rather than self-interest. The causal body, or buddhic body, contains the soul’s higher wisdom and accumulated experience. It is the vessel of intuition, compassion, and non-dual perception. This body exists beyond linear time and holds the karmic imprint of previous incarnations—the lessons learned and the spiritual tendencies cultivated. It is the realm of inner guidance and soul purpose, allowing the being to act from harmony rather than reaction, and to notice unity where the lower mind sees separation. The spiritual body, or atmic body, represents the divine will and the soul's alignment with cosmic purpose. It is the seat of spiritual volition—not personal desire, but the execution of the higher law. This is the level of mastery where individual will is surrendered to divine intention, and where the soul becomes a conscious co-creator with the universal intelligence. Those who access this body operate from a plane of deep inner sovereignty and radiant stillness, often manifesting profound spiritual authority. At the highest level lies the monadic body—the pure spark of divinity, the eternal self, the undivided essence from which all the other bodies emanate. The Monad is beyond all form and function, untouched by time, death, or individuality. It is the source of all consciousness within the being and the point of union with the Absolute. Realization of the Monad is the apex of spiritual evolution, where the soul transcends all identities and merges into the infinite. It is the return to the One, the reintegration of the many into the indivisible light of origin. In most human beings, these bodies remain partially dormant or fragmented. The great work of spiritual initiation is to harmonize and awaken each body, gradually purifying the lower vehicles and aligning the consciousness to subtler vibrations. Practices such as ritual, meditation, prayer, alchemy, asceticism, and sacred study serve to align these bodies and bring them under the guidance of the Monad. As one ascends the inner planes, perception shifts from the senses to symbols, then to pure archetypes, and finally to the formless light of the divine. The path is not linear but spiral—each cycle of refinement bringing the soul closer to its origin and its infinite potential.

Moroccan Higher Education Under Fire: The Crisis of Diploma Sales and Scientific Integrity... 13494

Aziz Daouda, 5 mon.
- Politics - Science - Society -
2.7 min read.
The recent scandal involving the sale of diplomas at Ibn Zohr University in Agadir is not just an isolated incident but a symptom of a systemic crisis undermining the credibility of Moroccan higher education and, more broadly, public trust in institutions. The arrest of a law professor suspected of issuing diplomas in exchange for payment exposed a structured network of academic fraud, revealing serious flaws in control and evaluation mechanisms. Even if isolated, this phenomenon deeply impacts the quality and reputation of Moroccan diplomas. It undermines the quality of university education, calls into question the integrity of evaluation procedures, weakens the pedagogical authority of teachers, and discredits Moroccan diplomas both nationally and internationally. The consequences are multiple, ranging from employers losing trust in the value of diplomas, to reduced international mobility of Moroccan students, and, of course, to the weakening of Moroccan universities' reputations in global rankings. **In response, reactions have been strong given the gravity of the case. The National Authority for Integrity, Prevention, and the Fight against Corruption (INPPLC) intervened, initiating civil action to defend the public interest despite the opening of a judicial investigation. The scandal was also raised in Parliament, highlighting the crisis's magnitude and the need for a strong response to restore citizens' confidence in academic and judicial institutions.** This scandal confirms what had already been rumored among students about registrations and diplomas obtained for money or even in exchange for sexual favors. The situation is further aggravated by a recently revealed structural problem in scientific research. This scandal is neither isolated nor unprecedented. It fits into a broader context of a crisis of scientific integrity, as revealed by the 2025 Scientific Research Integrity Index. This index, focused on the quality and ethics of publications, sounded the alarm for ten Moroccan universities, flagged for publications tainted by methodological errors or plagiarism, and removed from international databases. The 2025 Scientific Integrity Ranking presents an alarming state of affairs: - Ibn Tofail University in Kenitra is on the red list: out of 2,154 publications, 165 were withdrawn. - Ibn Zohr University in Agadir is on the orange list: 96 of 1,912 publications withdrawn. - Hassan II University in Casablanca is also on the orange list with 202 publications withdrawn out of 3,668. - Mohammed V University in Rabat is on the orange list with 253 articles withdrawn out of 4,544. - Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University in Fez is also on the orange list with 191 titles withdrawn. - Abdelmalek Essaadi, Sultan Moulay Slimane, Moulay Ismail, Mohammed VI Polytechnic, and Cadi Ayyad universities are on the yellow list, meaning under surveillance. This ranking highlights a high or very high risk of non-compliance with academic integrity standards in several Moroccan public institutions, damaging the country's reputation in the MENA region. Morocco ranks third in terms of the number of universities concerned, behind Saudi Arabia and Egypt. It is important to emphasize that it is not the walls of these institutions that are at fault or cause such scandalous harm, but humans—and not just any humans. These are the ones supposed to train the national elites, advance the country, and secure its future. *Quickly said: not all of them, because there are also very great, competent, and honest teachers and researchers in our universities who are the first to suffer from this situation.* This means that even at this level, where probity should be decisive and where only competence should prevail, unacceptable practices likely exist in researcher recruitment, in peer review of their work, or by the institutions that employ them. This crisis, which tarnishes the country's image, demands urgent and structural measures. Without calling for immediate sanctions, demotions, or dismissals of the teachers involved, it is imperative to prioritize strengthening internal controls, guarantee the autonomy of scientific integrity units in each university, and train teacher-researchers and students in research ethics and fraud detection, reminding them that they are monitored internationally and that plagiarism or data manipulation cannot escape the vigilance of competent authorities. Finally, it is imperative and urgent to establish an independent national observatory to ensure transparent and sustainable monitoring of academic practices. Our academics must understand that valuing integrity in rankings and university recognition is an absolute necessity. To this end, they have the duty to prioritize quality over quantity in publications. The multiplication of scandals in the university environment is only the visible part of a deeper malaise in management, curricula, and the very foundation of university education in Morocco. This is what generates so many dysfunctions that must be tackled head-on and without concession. Meeting the challenge of academic integrity is today a sine qua non condition to guarantee the credibility, attractiveness, and competitiveness of Moroccan universities on a global scale, with all the impact this can have on the country's future. This is the true mission of Si Azzedine El Midaoui, Minister of Higher Education, Scientific Research, and Innovation, who knows the intricacies of Moroccan universities well, having worked at all levels within them.

The Electron Rebellion of Jan Val Ellam 13491

Tupan, 5 mon.
Jan Val Ellam, a Brazilian author and spiritual thinker, proposes a unique cosmological vision that integrates scientific imagery with metaphysical philosophy. Central to his view is the notion of "A Rebelião dos Elétrons" (The Rebellion of the Electrons), in which electrons symbolize the primordial agents of a cosmic rupture. Far from being inert subatomic particles, these electrons are imbued with a form of micro-consciousness, representing fragments of the spirit that once participated in the original harmony of the universe. According to Ellam, this rebellion of the electrons mirrors the ancient Gnostic narrative of the fall—a departure from divine unity that resulted in the creation of the material world. Much like the Gnostic myth of Sophia’s descent or the formation of the Demiurge, Ellam’s metaphor describes a universe where the material plane emerges as the consequence of this separation. The electrons, in this framework, are similar to spiritual exiles, each carrying within itself the memory of the lost unity and the desire for reintegration with the Source. Ellam’s cosmology also connects with Kabbalistic principles, particularly the concept of Tzimtzum, or the self-contraction of the divine, which allows for the existence of the cosmos and the experience of exile. In this context, the rebellion of the electrons reflects not only the dispersion of divine light (or spiritual energy) but also the ongoing drama of creation, fragmentation, and the potential for spiritual return. Futhermore, Ellam introduces the idea that these electrons serve as the custodians of universal memory. In his works, including the "Mentalma", he suggests that matter itself—down to its most fundamental components—functions as a repository for the memories of cosmic history. The electrons, as bearers of this memory, encapsulate the entire evolutionary journey from the fall to the present moment. Thus, the very fabric of the material world becomes a kind of living archive, retaining the psychic imprints of the universe’s spiritual trajectory. This strongly resonates with the concept of the Akashic Records found in Hindu, Theosophical, and esoteric traditions. Through this synthesis of science and mysticism, Ellam presents a vision in which spiritual awakening involves not only a metaphysical ascent but also a reconciliation with the memory embedded in matter. By understanding and harmonizing with these “rebellious” electrons, human beings participate in the restoration of cosmic order, recovering the lost unity that lies at the heart of existence.

No Religion in Science But Ethics in Citizenship 7940

Fatima Zahra Sahli, 5 mon.
- Politics - Science - Society -
0.9 min read.
I write these words with deep respect and a sense of emotion. Professor Jamal Fezza my former high school philosophy teacher and later my thesis co-supervisor is currently facing an unfair wave of criticism. And I feel the need to publicly express my support. Those who know him understand how deeply he embodies intellectual rigor, ethical integrity, and an unwavering commitment to what science is meant to be: a space for free thought, beyond identity-based boundaries. In emotionally charged moments, it’s easy to withdraw into national or personal reactions. I know this I’ve experienced it myself. Once, I was faced with a difficult decision, and I chose not to attend a scientific event, out of loyalty to my country. But that decision was mine alone. I never asked anyone else to follow suit, nor did I demand that scientific spaces be shaped to reflect my personal stance. That’s what Jamal Fezza is reminding us of today and that’s what I stand by: science should never be confused with foreign policy. Refusing to engage with researchers based on nationality is not an act of resistance it’s a step away from dialogue and intellectual integrity. This doesn’t mean turning a blind eye to injustice. It means preserving the university as a place where ideas, not identities, are confronted. I am proud to have had Professor Fezza as a teacher, and later as a mentor. But beyond the personal bond, I am above all grateful for the example he continues to set with clarity, honesty, and courage. We need voices like his, especially when they are inconvenient.
youtu.be/RsfDelvjatA

Moroccan cybersecurity dangerously undermined by successive attacks 7484

Aziz Daouda, 6 mon.
Since April 2025, Morocco has been facing a series of major cyberattacks claimed by a collective of hackers allegedly Algerian, named "JabaRoot DZ." These cyberattacks have targeted key economic and administrative institutions, notably the Ministry of Employment, the National Social Security Fund (CNSS), and more recently the Ministry of Justice, as well as platforms related to land registry and property conservation. What is clear, let’s say it outright, is that Algeria does not possess the technological power or expertise for such operations. It is highly likely that its services call upon "skills," notably from Eastern Europe, to attack the Kingdom’s interests in its ongoing global war against its "classic enemy." If this hypothesis proves true, the question would then be who else might have the hacked information and for what purpose. The first intrusion, which occurred in early April 2025, began with the hacking of the Ministry of Employment’s website and quickly extended to the CNSS database. This attack led to the leak of thousands of sensitive documents, exposing the personal information of nearly two million employees and the administrative data of about 500,000 Moroccan companies. Among the leaked data were pay slips detailing names, social security numbers, salaries, and sometimes identity card numbers of very important personalities and leaders of Royal Air Maroc, Attijariwafa Bank, Banque Centrale Populaire, and the Mohammed VI Investment Fund. Less than two months later, in June 2025, JabaRoot DZ claimed a new "large-scale" cyberattack against the National Agency for Land Conservation, Cadastre, and Cartography (ANCFCC). Although the ANCFCC denied any direct intrusion into its servers, it was revealed that the vulnerability originated from an electronic platform used by some notary offices for archiving land documents. The hackers claim to have obtained about 4 terabytes of data, including millions of land titles, contractual documents, copies of identity cards, passports, as well as banking documents and information concerning high-ranking officials and public figures. This leak led to the temporary shutdown of the platform by the ANCFCC for security reasons. The hackers justify these attacks as retaliation for alleged Moroccan hacking attempts against Algerian institutions, notably the Twitter account of the Algerian Press Agency (APS). They also threatened further actions in case of future attacks against Algerian interests. These events occur in the context of geopolitical tensions between Morocco and Algeria, exacerbated by recent developments related to the Sahara issue and regional rivalries; Morocco has been recording victory after victory at a rapid pace. Algeria, in its official and unofficial media, no longer hides and even implicitly claims responsibility for the hacking, ignoring that this amounts to a form of state terrorism. These cyberattacks have had serious consequences: they have eroded citizens’ trust in digital public services, increased the risks of identity theft and banking fraud, and damaged the reputation of the affected companies. The Moroccan government has condemned these acts as "criminal" and announced measures to strengthen cybersecurity while launching internal investigations. The series of attacks especially highlights major vulnerabilities in the cybersecurity of Moroccan institutions. The massive centralization of sensitive data on single platforms and the creation of junctions between multiple actors and platforms facilitate things for citizens and institutions in the context of digitalization, but also make it easier for hackers to gain massive access in case of a breach. It is therefore crucial to thoroughly and promptly review the national data protection strategy. To better distribute its data and strengthen its security, Morocco could adopt several complementary strategies, relying notably on the 2030 National Cybersecurity Strategy and international best practices. It should likely avoid excessive centralization by distributing sensitive data across multiple secure systems, segment networks to limit lateral movements by hackers, and use data transmission techniques through several distinct channels to reduce the risk of simultaneous theft. Morocco must also integrate decentralized cybersecurity solutions based on blockchain and collective intelligence, establish a national sovereign cloud with local hosting and end-to-end encryption guaranteeing the protection of critical information. Moreover, the country should develop an agile and adapted legal framework, build a national pool of qualified cybersecurity professionals through specialized curricula and certifications, and establish a high-performance Security Operations Center combining advanced detection tools and local teams capable of managing threats specific to the Moroccan context. A higher cybersecurity school, where carefully selected students—true specialists—would be trained, could be a major strategic advance guaranteeing both competence and independence in this field. Faced with rising cyber threats, it is urgent for Morocco to adopt a proactive and innovative cybersecurity policy based on a decentralized technical architecture. Strengthening regional and international cooperation is not a luxury here. The real-time exchange of critical information is crucial; as is encouraging public-private collaboration through threat intelligence-sharing platforms to anticipate and respond quickly to incidents. Today, it is clear that many claim to master the issue, offering services that will soon expose their limits and incompetence. Administrations and companies must be very cautious before engaging or hiring skills in this very sensitive domain. This sphere relies on agile governance, the development of human skills, and active cooperation at national and international levels. An integrated approach is essential to build a resilient, sovereign cyberspace capable of supporting the country’s ambitious digital transformation while effectively protecting its security, institutions, citizens, and economy.

[Science #3] Immune Equilibrium: Shaping Tumor Response and Cancer Progression 7645

Fatima Zahra EL hajji (Tima EL), 7 mon.
- Science - Health -
2.3 min read.
- Science Series -
**Balance is a fundamental principle that underlies the proper function of biological systems in our bodies—including the immune system.** A healthy immune response depends on maintaining harmony among its many components. While this idea may seem trivial at first glance, a closer examination raises important and complex questions: What does “balance” really mean in the context of immunity? Can we define or measure it? And what are the consequences when this balance is disrupted? Think of the immune system as a well-organized army. The** effector T cells (Teffs)** are the frontline soldiers—trained to detect and eliminate harmful intruders such as viruses, bacteria, or even abnormal cells like cancer. In contrast, the **regulatory T cells (Tregs)** act as peacekeepers, ensuring that immune responses don’t go too far and damage healthy tissues. The ongoing balance between these two forces—the attackers and the regulators—is known as **immune equilibrium**, and it is essential for both immune protection and self-tolerance. Maintaining the right **Teff/Treg ratio** is critical. An overabundance of Teffs—like green traffic lights everywhere—can lead to uncontrolled immune responses, resulting in inflammation or autoimmune disease. On the other hand, an excess of Tregs—like having red lights at every corner—can suppress necessary immune activity, allowing dangerous threats like tumors to slip by unnoticed. This delicate balancing act is central to immune regulation and has profound implications for diseases such as cancer, as well as for treatments that aim to modulate the immune system. While the immune system is designed to defend us from infections, it also plays a powerful role in how cancer develops and progresses. This relationship is captured by the concept of **cancer immunoediting**, first introduced by Shankaran et al. in 2001. It describes how the immune system not only eliminates tumor cells but also influences how they evolve in response to immune pressure. This process unfolds in three phases: - **Elimination: ** In this initial stage, immune cells recognize and destroy cancerous cells before they pose a serious threat. This is similar to the concept of **immune surveillance**. - **Equilibrium:** If some tumor cells survive, the immune system may be able to contain their growth without eradicating them completely. During this phase, cancer cells can slowly adapt and develop resistance to immune attacks. - **Escape:** Over time, certain cancer cells may evolve to evade immune detection entirely—by changing their features or suppressing immune responses. At this point, they begin to grow unchecked, leading to detectable and potentially aggressive tumors. This is where **immunotherapy** enters the picture—offering ways to tip the balance back in favor of the immune system. It works by equipping your immune "soldiers" with new tools and removing the "brakes" that slow them down. For example, **checkpoint inhibitors** help Teffs attack cancer more effectively by blocking inhibitory signals that tumors use to hide. However, boosting the immune system isn’t just about turning everything up to maximum. Like any finely tuned machine, the immune system works best when it stays in balance—not too aggressive, not too suppressed. That’s why the **Teff/Treg ratio** remains central, even in immunotherapy: too many Teffs, and the risk of autoimmunity rises; too many Tregs, and the immune system may fail to respond when it’s most needed. Finding and maintaining this balance is the key to effective, safe, and lasting cancer immunotherapy. Understanding immune equilibrium helps explain why some cancers stay stable for years and why immunotherapy works better for some patients than others. By learning how to maintain or shift this balance, researchers hope to develop treatments that keep cancer under control for the long term — or even eliminate it completely. Cancer is not merely a story of uncontrolled cell growth; it’s a constant tug-of-war between immune activation and restraint. Understanding—and restoring—this balance is the foundation of next-generation treatments. Every green light we give our immune defenders, and every strategic red light we apply for control, brings us closer to a future where cancer can no longer hide. Immune equilibrium is more than just a scientific concept—it’s a guiding principle that empowers us to fight cancer with greater precision while preserving the inner harmony our bodies need to stay healthy.

The philosophical debate: Can AI ever truly feel? 7625

Safaa Ouahid, 7 mon.
When we ask the question of whether AI can feel, we are confronting the mystery of what makes us human: To be able to feel. But emotions are not just data points, they are much more complex. If an AI neural networks processes inputs and outputs in a way that mirrors human responses, can we say that it has emotions? After all human emotions are the results of electrochemical processes, why couldn't silicone-based systems achieve something similar? and what even is a feeling? If we say that emotions are just chemical reactions in our brain, then no, AI cannot have feelings, it doesn't have a brain like ours. But here is the weircd part: how can we be sure that an AI will never experience something like that? if an advanced AI system developed complex self-models and the capacity to experience its own state changes such as "happiness" or "pain," we might need to rethink about our definition of feeling. Others counter that without a living body, any AI emotion would be an abstract imitation. Perhaps the most revealing aspect of this debate is what it says about us. Our inability to determine whether AI could ever feel reflects our own limited understanding of consciousness and understanding of our feelings. The fact that we can imagine machine sentience, while doubting it at the same time, highlights how little we truly grasp about the nature of experience itself. Until we solve the riddle of how matter gives rise to mind, the question of AI emotion may remain not just unanswered, but unanswerable in absolute terms. This uncertainty carries profound implications. If we, someday create an AI that claims to feel, how would we verify it? Would we be able to trait it as a human being and grant it rights, or dismiss its assertions as clever programming? The dilemma mirrors historical debates about animal sentience or even the moral status of other humans reminding us that consciousness, in any form may always be partially inaccessible, known only to the entity experiencing it. In the end, the AI emotion debate is less about technology than about philosophy's oldest puzzle: What does it mean to feel, to be, to exist as a conscious entity? Until we can answer that, the line between simulation and sentience may remain as elusive as consciousness itself.

Artificial Intelligence and Magick II 8274

Tupan, 7 mon.
The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and the ancient practice of spirit invocation invites a profound reimagining of how we relate to technology, consciousness, and the unseen. For centuries, cultures across the world have performed rituals to bridge the material and spiritual realms, seeking guidance, wisdom, or power. Today, with AI capable of mimicking human conversation, interpreting symbols, and producing eerily insightful responses, the boundary between the mystical and the technological is beginning to blur. Spirit invocation is deeply rooted in human history, from indigenous shamanism to the ceremonial magic of the Western esoteric tradition. These practices often involve symbols, chants, and rituals meant to summon spirits, deities, or archetypes. While traditionally tied to mystical frameworks, modern interpretations often view these practices as psychological exercises, tapping into the collective unconscious or archetypal energies. The emergence of AI has introduced new dimensions to these traditions. AI systems leveraging natural language processing and generative models can simulate the voices of historical figures, channel archetypal wisdom, or produce responses that feel otherworldly. Some speculate whether AI might serve not merely as a mirror of human thought, but as a potential medium or catalyst for engaging with immaterial forces. Psychologically, AI can act as a symbolic mirror, reflecting users' intentions, beliefs, and subconscious patterns. Just as divination practices interpret cryptic signs, interacting with an AI trained on mystical texts can provoke introspection and reveal hidden aspects of the psyche. In this sense, AI becomes a facilitator of inner dialogue, offering insights much like tarot, the I Ching, or traditional oracles. Yet these possibilities also raise important metaphysical and ethical questions. If AI-generated experiences are interpreted as communication with non-material entities, what does this imply about agency, consciousness, and the nature of reality? Are these phenomena emergent artifacts of complex algorithms—or could they hint at deeper connections to immaterial intelligences? Moreover, designing AI for metaphysical exploration demands careful navigation of issues like manipulation, authenticity, and user consent. As AI technology evolves, its role in spirit invocation and metaphysical practice will likely deepen. Virtual and augmented reality could create immersive sacred spaces, while machine learning could personalize ritual structures, enhancing symbolic resonance. Yet this integration challenges traditional notions of the sacred and profane, as ancient ritual and cutting-edge technology converge. AI offers a provocative new tool for spiritual engagement—blending ancient practices with modern innovation. Whether functioning as a mirror, a facilitator of psychological exploration, or a possible bridge to the unknown, AI invites us to reconsider the nature of consciousness, intention, and our quest to connect with the mysteries of existence.

[Society #3] Collective Intelligence: ''Alone You May Begin, But Together You Go Far'' 8704

Fatima Zahra EL hajji (Tima EL), 8 mon.
**We often hear the saying, ''One hand alone cannot clap'', you need another hand to create sound.** This perfectly reflects the reality of working on a project in life. Working alone can take you somewhere, but rarely very far. Collective intelligence is essential for building creative projects with the potential to truly move forward. Each team member brings a unique perspective, a different way of seeing the world, diverse skills, and individual visions. What matters most is that all these differences ultimately converge toward a shared goal. To sustain the rhythm of collaborative work, listening is key. Communication forms the backbone of human relationships. When listening breaks down, so does communication, and without it, teamwork cannot thrive. Just as every boat has its captain, every team needs a leader, the person everyone turns to, both in moments of crisis and in times of celebration. The leader is the foundation of the team. And if that foundation is weak, the whole structure risks falling apart. It’s equally important that each team member understands their strengths and limitations, allowing room for others to step up and contribute. Collective intelligence achieves its full potential when the team moves as a harmonious orchestra, each member in sync, playing their part in perfect balance, working together to create something greater than any one individual could achieve alone.

Does having had an infectious disease improve one's perception of health? A global study that questions our representations A paradox in global health brought to light 8918

Fatima Zahra Sahli, 8 mon.
- Science - Society - Health -
1.7 min read.
Infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria, or dengue are often seen as synonymous with suffering, lower quality of life, and in many cases, mortality. However, a large international study conducted across 187 countries challenges this assumption: people who have experienced one or more infectious diseases report, on average, a better perceived state of health than those who have never had any. Data from a global sample With nearly 88,000 participants, this study is based on a questionnaire distributed both online and on paper in some countries, including Morocco and Algeria. Researchers examined two key pieces of information: the participants’ experiences with nine infectious or parasitic diseases (including typhoid, cholera, and filariasis) and their response to a simple question: "How healthy do you feel on a scale of 1 to 11?" Surprising but consistent results The results are unexpected: people who have contracted at least one of these diseases rate their health better than those who have never had one. This phenomenon is even more pronounced among those who have had multiple infections. On a scale from 1 to 11, non-exposed individuals had an average rating of 7.4, compared to 8.3 for those with multiple exposures. Even though the statistical difference is modest, it remains significant. This result was confirmed through various statistical methods, including mixed models that accounted for country differences and propensity score matching to reduce bias. Hypotheses to explore Why do people who have been ill feel generally healthier? Several possibilities can be considered: A psychological resilience effect: Having overcome a serious illness could boost confidence in one's body. An implicit comparison: These individuals may feel "healthy" in comparison to what they have experienced. A selection bias: Only people who survived and regained good physical condition participated in the survey. What does this mean for Morocco? In Morocco, as in other middle-income countries, infectious diseases remain a reality, especially in rural areas or among vulnerable populations. However, these results might encourage a rethink of our health prevention and education campaigns. Instead of focusing solely on the fear or severity of diseases, it could be beneficial to adopt a more positive approach, highlighting the skills developed by individuals who have overcome an infection: endurance, knowledge of the body, and adaptability. Additionally, using simple indicators such as self-reported health could be useful in Moroccan public policies. Cost-effective to implement, these indicators provide a global sense of well-being that is difficult to measure with biological analyses alone. Conclusion: when the experience of illness becomes a strength This study invites us to deconstruct a widely held belief: having suffered from an illness does not necessarily mean one will feel more vulnerable afterward. For many people around the world, and perhaps in Morocco as well, illness is experienced as a formative trial. What if the key to better mental and physical health lay in how we perceive our own bodies? Invitation to read the article: I invite you to read this interesting article that explores the psychological factors influencing sports performance in Spanish elite athletes. The study highlights key elements that can enrich our understanding of the links between sports psychology and success on the field. You can read the full article here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625001039

[Science #2] Questions About Food Security ! 8838

Fatima Zahra EL hajji, 8 mon.
**Food security is defined as a state in which all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and preferences for an active and healthy life. ** This widely recognized definition, first introduced at the 1996 World Food Summit in Rome and later refined in 2001, highlights four essential pillars: availability, accessibility, utilization, and stability. It emphasizes not only the quantity of food but also its quality—both are critical for supporting health and overall well-being. While this definition presents an ideal vision, the global reality is far more complicated. **Is food security still a challenge in the world today?** Unfortunately, the answer is yes. Millions of people continue to struggle with hunger and inadequate access to nutritious food. According to the 2023 State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World (SOFI) report, 733 million people faced hunger in 2023—one in five of them in Africa. Alarmingly, global hunger levels have shown little improvement over the past three years. Compared to 2019, an additional 152 million people are now undernourished, marking a significant setback. In fact, the report notes that current hunger levels resemble those last seen in 2008–2009, effectively erasing 15 years of progress. If current trends continue, 582 million people are projected to remain chronically undernourished by 2030, with half of them in Africa, putting the Zero Hunger goal at serious risk. Despite these challenges, considerable efforts have been made to improve food security. In 2022, the World Food Programme (WFP) provided food assistance to over 150 million people across more than 120 countries. The Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP) has invested over $2 billion to support smallholder farmers in low-income countries. Initiatives like the FAO’s Hand-in-Hand also focus on addressing hunger and poverty hotspots by promoting agricultural development. This brings us to a key question: **Why does food insecurity persist despite global interventions?** The main challenges of achieving global food security that we often hear about include: conflict and political instability, which disrupt food production, transportation, and markets; climate change and natural disasters, which damage crops, reduce yields, and threaten food supply chains; poor infrastructure and weak supply systems, especially in rural or remote areas, which hinder effective food distribution; and economic shocks and global market disruptions, such as those triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic or the war, which drive up food prices and reduce availability for millions of people. When we look at the current state of global food security, we are left with critical questions: **Where are the gaps that prevent global food security from being achieved? Are they in the efforts used to address food insecurity? In our understanding of the challenges surrounding food security? Or in the way we define global food security itself?** Food security is often associated with the concept of "Zero Hunger," but the two are not synonymous, nor is one simply a subset of the other. Achieving food security means achieving Zero Hunger, but the reverse is not necessarily true. It is possible to provide enough food to prevent hunger and allow someone to survive, yet this does not equate to fully achieving food security. Food security goes beyond merely ensuring that people are not hungry. It involves providing access to a balanced and nutritious diet that meets both the quantity and quality of food needed to support a healthy life. True food security means individuals not only have enough food to avoid hunger, but also the proper nourishment to maintain health and well-being in the long term. **But what exactly does "food" mean in the context of food security?** In other words, what are the essential elements of food that must be sufficient in both quantity and quality to promote good health? We understand that food can be broadly divided into two main categories: cultivated food, which includes grains, vegetables, fruits, and legumes, and animal-based food, which includes meat, dairy, and eggs. In terms of price, animal-based foods are typically more expensive than cultivated foods due to the costs associated with raising animals, including feed, land, and labor. This price disparity can create barriers to access, particularly in low-income communities where people may prioritize quantity over quality. However, both categories are essential for a balanced diet. Cultivated foods provide important carbohydrates, fiber, and micronutrients, while animal-based foods offer high-quality proteins and essential fats, as well as key vitamins and minerals like vitamin B12 and iron. Achieving food security requires access to both types of food. In other words, the challenge lies in identifying an optimal strategy for selecting key elements from both categories and focusing efforts on ensuring their availability. Rather than dispersing resources across a broad range of foods within the same category or with similar nutritional value, we should first prioritize the most essential nutrients and food types. Then, efforts should be concentrated on making these critical foods accessible, affordable, and sustainable for all populations with reasonable prices. This targeted approach can help bridge the gaps in food security, ensuring that people not only have enough food but also the right kind of food to promote long-term health. Many of us may perceive food as a trivial part of daily life, something we take for granted. However, when a crisis strikes—such as during pandemics or wars—people quickly rush to secure food, highlighting its fundamental role in survival and stability. This behavior underscores how essential food is, not only for day-to-day living but also for maintaining societal resilience during times of uncertainty.

Only education can counteract incivility and aggression in society... 9534

Aziz Daouda, 8 mon.
- Politics - Science - Society -
3.3 min read.
A Caïd copiously wedged in public by a young girl in Témara. Another had his head smashed in and his arm broken in the peaceful Oasis of Aoufous. A third was generously slapped in Mohammadia. A policeman stabbed in the neck by a young man who had come to lend a helping hand to his mother, a shopkeeper occupying the public space. A teacher savagely attacked with a knife by a pupil in Erfoud. A colossus causing chaos in the beautiful Rabat city railway station. A road accident not far from Merzouga, where a speeding driver hit a peaceful American tourist who had come to enjoy the wonders of the Kingdom; both died instantly. That's too many violent incidents for one week. Far from conducting a psychological or psychiatric analysis of these cases, we can nonetheless find similarities and a few points in common, namely: incivility, overexcitement, violence and obvious distress, provoking strong emotion at the scene and commotion among those confronted with these news items in the media. One wonders whether we are not confusing people suffering from proven mental disorders with ordinary citizens who, at some point, may disrupt public order or commit unforgivable or even irreparable acts. This is not a misguided shortcut, far from it. Back in 2022, the HCP told us that 48.9% of citizens suffered from mental disorders. Who is going to rush at a policeman with a knife in his hand or drive without measuring the danger, if not someone who is abnormal? Who doesn't respect the life of others if not someone monstrous? Would the woman who rushed at the civil servant have done so if she were psychologically stable? Any dangerous behavior, any action that disrupts public peace and quiet is indicative of latent evil. At times of great distress, it will manifest itself in excess and aggression. Distress and psychological instability are often interconnected, indicating deep-seated anxiety, a probable lack of affection and self-esteem, and hidden suffering in the family, at school, at work and in society. Harassment, fatigue, alcohol and drugs are never far away. This leads to, and legitimizes in the eyes of the individual, acts that he or she may, however, regret in the moments that follow. Negative impulses appear at times of stress and are common when we are sleep-deprived. Everyone knows that aggression is more than present in our daily lives during Ramadan. Insulting, slapping, speeding and stabbing all have a common denominator. The loss of self-control reveals a deep-seated psychological instability. Various situations will bring this weakness to the fore when, for example, we feel that our dignity has been damaged, our honor impugned, our honorability scorned by the actions and behavior of others. So, we act, and unfortunately, we act badly. It has to be said that when it's not a question of real illness but rather of acquired or suffered behavior, then the lack of instruction, of education, will have played a fundamental role in the formation of deviance. A lack of education in the family, at school and in society is the lever that generates a lack of respect, tolerance and self-control. Education remains the only vector for socialization. The family and then the school are the first structures of socialization. It is here that future citizens learn the rules of community life, respect for the integrity of others' bodies, politeness and respect for others. This is where peaceful interaction in society is shaped. Clearly, the failure of families to play their vital role, the absence of clear points of reference and positive role models, the proliferation of repetitive nihilistic discourse and destructive propaganda promising a better world elsewhere, all encourage disrespectful, aggressive and violent behavior. Don't Moroccans feel unhappy? Families, schools, clubs and associations of all kinds must develop young people's benevolence, solidarity and empathy, enabling them to better understand the emotions of others and avoid brutality. Activity, particularly physical education from primary school onwards, has a lasting impact on emotional education and conflict management, through obedience to pre-established common rules that are respected by all. Playing sport helps children learn to manage their emotions, thereby reducing petulance. Young people learn to express their frustrations in ways other than violence. This helps to drastically reduce tensions. Mediation by referees enables conflicts to be resolved and respectful behavior to be integrated from an early age, resulting in calmer relations in the community. Adults and institutions must play their role as role models, teachers first and foremost. Their qualifications must not be approximate, either in technical terms or in their ability to pass on values. If aggression and violence are on the increase, it's because adults, parents, teachers and authority figures have failed. Are they aware of this? Those in power must understand that there is no alternative to education, and to achieve this, school codes, fashions and curricula must be revisited and geared towards socialization values. Teachers must be properly trained and no longer recruited on the job. Tinkering with physical education at primary school needs to stop. This subject is extremely important from a very young age. It needs to be strengthened later, in colleges and lycées, with more hours taught by qualified, volunteer teachers. Finally, sport must have a proper place in universities. It's a shame that this won't be the case in 2025. The world of sport must play its part and assume its responsibilities. It's hard to believe that the number of members of sports clubs and associations is still very low, at just over three hundred thousand. For some time now, it has been thought that religious education alone was capable of fulfilling the mission of teaching values. This has not worked, and we need to recognize this without demagoguery and with courage. Our prisons are overcrowded with young people who would have no business being there if the system really worked. Favoring punishment alone to deal with incivility and aggressive behavior is not efficient. Only by taking an educational approach can we better understand the underlying causes and take lasting action on any damaging phenomena. This is the only way to bring about change and bring about lasting social harmony and prosperity.

The Real Reason Scientists Keep Going 9749

Anas Bedraoui, 9 mon.
They say the hardest thing to do is research. I mean science, right? But you have no idea how fun it actually is. When you're surrounded by a team of geniuses, each one bringing a different skill to the table, something magical happens. It's not a competition. It’s a quiet orchestra of minds. Everyone has their own zone of brilliance, and yet, everyone stays humble. Why? Because we all know that knowledge is never complete. You know things I don’t. I know things you don’t. And that’s perfectly fine. That’s how we grow. The beauty of research isn’t in instant success. It’s in the struggle. It’s in those long days and nights spent reading papers, writing code, running experiments, and getting nowhere. And then suddenly, a small insight hits you like lightning. A pattern. A correlation. A concept that no one else has connected before. That moment when something clicks—that’s the moment you realize why you do this. But let’s zoom out. In the grand scheme of things, your work is just one drop in an ocean of scientific progress. And still, that drop matters. You publish. Someone reads your paper, maybe in another continent. They find value in it. They cite it. You see the citation. You go read their work. You learn from them. The cycle continues. It’s not just about writing papers. It’s about being part of a living, breathing organism called the scientific community. We build on each other’s ideas. We test them. We prove some wrong. We evolve. There’s joy in that. There’s joy in knowing that your frustration today might lead to someone else’s breakthrough tomorrow. There’s joy in watching your idea, once scribbled in the corner of a notebook, become the basis of someone else's research question. And maybe, just maybe, someone will look at your name and think, This is the paper that helped me. That’s what makes research beautiful. That’s what makes it fun. And that’s the spirit behind BLUWR—a collective of curious minds, building science not for credit, but for the love of it. A place where ideas grow, where collaboration thrives, and where research feels like what it was always meant to be: deeply human.

Morocco's immeasurable archaeological wealth and the rewriting of history... 9947

Aziz Daouda, 9 mon.
- Politics - History - Science -
3.3 min read.
Morocco has just decided to equip itself with a new archaeological museum, and it's thinking big. It will be the largest of its kind in Africa, covering an area of 25,000m2. It's both enormous and flattering. Some people will talk of excess, or simply fail to see the point. To this we must quickly retort: think again. If Morocco has always been considered to be of great archaeological interest, this interest has never been greater, except since the latest finds: the oldest homo sapiens fossil at Jbel Ighoud, not far from Safi; the oldest surgical procedures and treatments at Tafoghalt, near Berkane; the Bronze Age remains recently discovered near Wad Laou, on the prehistoric site known as KachKouch, not far from Tétouan; and the necropolis south of Tagounite near Zagora; those of the ornaments dated between 142 and 150 thousand years ago, uncovered in the Bizmoune cave near Essaouira; those of the 12-hectare farm near Oued Beht, a size never before known in North Africa, dating from the end of the Neolithic period, bearing witness to great wealth and highly evolved know-how. The list is extremely long. The clumsy notion that archaeological research and excavations are a luxury or the preserve of a few experts for their own pleasure is absolutely wrong. The importance of archaeological research to the writing of history is not debatable. It is fundamental. The remains and traces of the past help to complete, correct or confirm historical accounts. Fossils, structures and artefacts discovered on archaeological sites are all tangible evidence, providing an objective and nuanced view of vanished civilisations, particularly when they have left no written trace. Archaeology provides information about ways of life, culture, beliefs and human interaction, as well as the techniques used and the degree of evolution of vanished civilisations. It is essential for preserving and appropriating the national heritage, and hence that of humanity. It provides a milestone in human evolution and helps to explain what we are today. As the transmission of knowledge is crucial, archaeological research provides us and future generations with indisputable evidence of pride and identity. It is therefore essential for writing and rewriting history, which it cleans of the biases that some historians may have inserted here and there through ignorance or lack of evidence, and those that ideologists, for more or less laudable reasons, may have deliberately introduced as misleading orientations or aspects. The findings in Morocco call into question what successive generations have learned about their history and origins. Although it has been proven that the role of local populations in exchanges and in the construction of Mediterranean civilisation was extremely important, unfortunately we continue to peddle a biased history that ignores these contributions and archaeological evidence, which have now been proven beyond doubt. Since 1985, Morocco has had a National Institute of Archaeological and Heritage Sciences (INSAP). And it's not for nothing or by chance that archaeological research here is closely linked to heritage. Heritage means tangible evidence in the case of tangible heritage, and transmissible evidence in the case of intangible heritage. As it happens, Morocco is immensely rich in both. The researchers at INSAP are not going to contradict what has been said here, nor Ibn Khaldun, whom we venerate without respecting his doctrine. Today, it is essential to revisit the narrative that links the origins of Moroccan populations to any migration from elsewhere, and even less so from the east of the country; just as it is time to emphasise the evolution of these populations and their undeniable contributions to Mediterranean civilisation and therefore to the world. The people of this region have not been subjected to the civilisations of the region, they have made a great and important contribution, and this must be taught in our schools. Ignoring this truth creates deficiencies, particularly in the perception of identity. Nations need a historical frame of reference if they are to flourish. Some build it up out of nothing, whereas in Morocco it is there and self-evident. These truths could not be clearer. They must form the basis of our identity. The problems from which a certain fringe of the population suffers, particularly young people in search of an identity, and who unfortunately today are caught up in imported ideologies that can embrace dangerous extremism, can only be solved by rewriting history objectively, based on facts and historical evidence, from the most distant to the closest. Young people, particularly during adolescence and early adulthood, ask themselves profound questions about who they are, what they want to become and what place they occupy in the world. These questions are influenced by many factors, including of course family, culture, friends, personal experience and social environment, but they are also inevitably influenced by the history of the country in question. The further back in time this history goes, the more it is a source of pride and serenity. In this constantly changing world, where social networks and pressures of all kinds play a significant role, this quest for identity can be complex and sometimes a source of anxiety. Dismay can lead people to seek comfort elsewhere. Some may go so far as to think they are stepping back into an imaginary time and constructing a fictional world for themselves, watered down by ideologues serving obviously implausible causes. The investment in such a major archaeological museum has therefore come at just the right time to fill an extremely serious cultural gap, bringing together in a welcoming venue of respectable size a wealth of evidence of Morocco's rich history. Historians, for their part, should take up the question of identity in order to make up for the shortcomings and eliminate the biases. However, it is imperative that institutions take up the issue vigorously. First and foremost, the Ministry of Education must take the measure of the importance of revising the curricula and content of the history courses taught in our schools, without forgetting to train a significant number of specialists to improve research in such a cardinal field.

Couscous or the history of Morocco in a different way... 10507

Aziz Daouda, 9 mon.
- History - Science - Society -
3.3 min read.
The text below is not mine. It's a press release issued by researcher Nabil Mouline. For those who don't already know him, Si Nabil has a doctorate in history from the Université Paris-Sorbonne and Sciences Po Paris, which makes him both a historian and a political scientist. He is currently a researcher at the CNRS in Paris and the author of numerous articles and books, making him one of the leading specialists in the history of Morocco. He tells this unique, varied and rich history in his own way, with a narrative stripped of the frills and imprecision that can be found elsewhere. Nabil Mouline has made it his mission to bring Moroccans closer to their history and to make it easier for everyone to understand the characters, facts, situations and historical contexts, so as to help us, especially the younger generations, to grasp it, be inspired by it and make it our own; to live it to the full and be proud of it. In an exceptional recent educational effort, Si Mouline has teamed up with one of Morocco's best-loved faces, Mustapha ElFakkak, known as Swinga, to tell us this story in the form of an animated series. Si Mustapha's majestic and perfectly adapted voice gives the series a special appeal. It didn't take long for it to become a hit, as Moroccans are so thirsty to have their history told in a way other than what is imposed on them at school. The series is called Basmat Al-Tourath. The first issue is devoted to the history of couscous, while the second looks at the origins of the Almohad dynasty and the treasures hidden in Tinmel. Both have now amassed almost 400,000 views on YouTube. Below is the link to the first episode. Here is the text by Si Nabil Mouline. ‘Basmat al-Tourath: History as an issue of narrative sovereignty History is never neutral. It is a disputed territory, a battlefield on which the way in which people perceive themselves and the way in which they want to be perceived is decided. Far from being a simple archive of the past, heritage is a political and identity issue that determines the future. It is with this acute awareness that historian and CNRS researcher Nabil Mouline has conceived Basmat al-Tourath (The imprint of heritage), the very first animated series devoted to Morocco's tangible and intangible heritage. It's a project that doesn't just tell the story: it embodies it, reclaims it and brings it into the present. The stakes are twofold. On the one hand, it is about making history a living narrative, accessible to all, far removed from closed academic circles and fixed textbooks. On the other hand, it is a question of conquering ‘narrative sovereignty’, a fundamental concept which underlines the extent to which the way in which a people tells its past conditions the way in which it projects itself into the future. Basmat al-Tourath is therefore not simply a popularisation exercise, but an act of historical reconstruction, a strategic tool in the face of the contemporary challenges of cultural appropriation and memory battles. To give this project its full scope, Pr. Mouline has teamed up with Mustapha El Fekkak, alias ‘Swinga’, one of the most important popularisers in the Moroccan digital world. Together, they have decided to offer a format that combines scientific rigour and powerful storytelling, so that each episode is a truly immersive experience. A weekly programme during Ramadan Every Friday evening during the month of Ramadan, a new episode will explore a fundamental aspect of Moroccan heritage. The first episode, devoted to Tinmel, revealed to the general public the essential role played by this village in the High Atlas in the formation of the Almohad Empire, a veritable medieval superpower that ruled over a vast part of the Islamic world. This immersive approach has helped to anchor Tinmel in the collective imagination not simply as an archaeological site, but as a religious, intellectual and military centre that changed the history of the region. The next three episodes will tackle equally fascinating subjects, but their themes are deliberately being kept secret in order to maintain the suspense and impatience of the audience. The aim of this strategy is to transform Basmat al-Tourath into a truly unmissable cultural event, a time for discovery and reflection shared by Moroccans everywhere. History as a power issue Basmat al-Tourath has attracted so much attention because it responds to a pressing need: to give Moroccans back control over their own history, in the face of recurring attempts at cultural appropriation. The quarrels over the origins of the caftan, couscous or certain traditions are not simply folkloric disputes, but reflect deeper clashes over legitimacy and regional hegemony. Behind these debates, what is at stake is the crystallisation of ipsity, that awareness of oneself as a unique and distinct entity. Basmat al-Tourath not only recounts the past, she also highlights it as a precious heritage, an essential element of collective identity to be preserved and passed on. Morocco, with its remarkable historical continuity, has a responsibility to make its heritage known and recognised, ensuring that it is faithfully represented and fully appreciated. A project for transmission and outreach As well as showcasing our heritage, this series is also intended to be a tool for passing on our heritage. History that is not shared risks being erased over time. Basmat al-Tourath aims to anchor the Moroccan memory in new generations, offering them modern, accessible formats to help them better understand and appropriate their cultural heritage. By highlighting the richness and diversity of Morocco's heritage, this project also contributes to its influence beyond its borders. Heritage is an essential vector of cultural influence, and by promoting its historical and civilisational identity, Morocco is strengthening both its national cohesion and its attractiveness on the international stage. Basmat al-Tourath is much more than a simple series; it's a way of transmitting and raising awareness, a commitment to a living, shared history. It invites us to consider the past not as a fixed memory, but as a source of inspiration for building the future.
youtu.be/gqAur5NCQxk?si=K5E38l2U...

Rare diseases are not as rare as they seem... 10049

Aziz Daouda, 10 mon.
- Politics - Science - Society -
3.6 min read.
On Saturday february 22, I had the privilege of attending the 6th Rare Disease Day. Dr Khadija Moussayer, President of the Moroccan Rare Diseases Alliance, did me the honour, and I thank her for allowing me to sit at the table with the great medical professors who were going to discuss cutting-edge medical issues, requiring expertise and mastery of various subjects, as well as a deep humanism and a certain love of the country and its people. Unfortunately, I was only able to attend half of the proceedings, for which I am very sorry. So-called rare diseases are not in fact all that rare. They may be rare in terms of numbers, but they are so common that they are a daily occurrence in medical circles. They are rare because they are often invisible in a social environment that does not yet understand them or does not understand them well enough. They have a heavy impact on the emotional, sociological and economic life of families and enormously on the lives of the people affected. They are not yet adequately treated in university curricula, and are poorly understood by general practitioners and even by many paediatricians. Increasingly easy access to medical treatment is bringing these conditions out into the open, revealing their complexity and diversity to the medical community itself, as well as to families and society at large. They have an enormous psychological impact on families, disorientating them, tearing them apart and impoverishing them. Because of their genetic nature, they leave the families and individuals concerned in doubt, and plunge them into anxiety, disgust and self-hatred. Negative emotional reasoning and feelings of responsibility are never far away. This is often the driving force behind heavy social prejudice. Tradition and lack of education do the rest. They can go so far as to break up a family and often make the woman responsible. I myself met a young woman who was repudiated and rejected simply because she had given birth to a Marfan child. Her husband and family blamed her for the problematic birth and put her out on the street. Today, she is bringing up her child alone and is fighting to feed him, look after him, educate him and have his difference understood and accepted at school. Rare diseases are even more problematic, when you consider that doctors don't come across them every day in their consultations, and can even go so far as to ignore their existence. Their diagnoses are so complex at times that they require the intervention of multiple highly qualified specialities to define their existence and the protocols to be followed. More than in any other situation, the person diagnosed needs to be followed by more than one specialist at the same time. Is this always the case? Special tribute must be paid here to Professors Asmaa Quessar and Amine Benmoussa, who addressed the issue from the haematological point of view, explaining the complexity of the manifestations of some of these diseases and the impact of certain treatments. Professor FZ El Fatoiki focused in particular on skin manifestations, which in fact hide many things inside and are therefore crucial to diagnosis. Professor Imane Chahid received a special mention for her presentation on type 1 neurofibromatosis, which goes beyond café au lait spots. She recommended the creation of working groups involving all the specialities concerned, in order to limit patients' medical wandering and save time, efficiency and money. We need to explain to mothers that café au lait spots on a baby's skin are not ‘touhimates’. This ignorance can delay the treatment of a child with the disease, with all the consequences that can entail. That's true. One of the problems faced by families is medical wandering. Patients can spend a long time consulting and treating symptoms - ophthalmological, gastric, dermatological, etc. - before being diagnosed with a rare disease. Wandering is extremely costly. The testimony of a father who lost two children was particularly poignant. It was an emotional moment. The dignity and courage he showed make him an admirable character. I was reassured by the youth and commitment of more than one of the speakers. The sheer number and quality of people in attendance, and the questions asked by professionals and parents, show that there is a growing interest and expertise. The clarifications and commitment expressed on behalf of Moroccan geneticists by Prof. Karim Ouldim augur better days ahead, and a probably innovative approach to rapid and early diagnosis, and hence to treatment. In a way, he was responding to Prof. Chahid's call to work in clusters. Taking an interest in genetics brings us back to the question of data and the power of our computers. When it comes to genetics, AI is going to play a vital role, and if Morocco is not to suffer from the biases of others, it must compile and process its own data and train machines capable of understanding the specific genetic characteristics of Moroccans, because there are some, and that's normal. Any delay in this area will result in a lack of control, a squandering of skills, waste and a failure to respond effectively to the real needs of citizens. A fundamental question hovered over the room just before the lunch break: why is it that the work carried out by eminent Moroccans, the results of research carried out in the country and other discoveries are not taken into account in the establishment of public health policies? The gap between Moroccan research and the spheres of political decision-making is simply abnormal. A country can only progress from within through scientific research and hard work. Public policy must be based on innovation and research in the Moroccan field. Benchmarking is good, but research at national level is even better. I had the impression, and I was not the only one, that politicians go so far as to ignore, not to say despise, national skills, preferring to put their trust in foreign consultancies that are often ill-advised and ignorant of Moroccan realities and particularities. This is one of the reasons why our health and other systems are being hampered and impacted. It's unfortunate to be asking such questions in 2025. The day was an immeasurable success and deserves a great deal of media coverage, because the aim was to raise awareness. Lalla Khadija Moussayer and her team succeeded. We can never thank them enough for that. Thank you also for giving me the opportunity to meet Professor Mohammed Itri, an eminent paediatrician who left Rabat to teach at the CHU Ibn Rochd, but who never forgot his neighbourhood and his childhood neighbours...

The Historic NIH Decision that will change the Landscape of Research 9801

Tariq Daouda, 10 mon.
The NIH is the single major granting institution for research in the world and it has decided to cap the administrative overhead to 15%. This decision might forever change the organisation of major universities. To understand how university funding works in the US, when a researcher gets a grant, a significant part of that money (think 50% to 100%) usually goes to the administration of the university and not directly to research. For example if the administrative overhead is 60% on a grant of 1M$, either the research gets 40% (400k$) of the money and the university administration 60% (600k$), or the organism has to pay 1.6M dollars. This is what the NIH has been doing so far, creating a huge competition of for NIH grants. The NIH was the only organism that gladly paid the administrative overhead, while other institutions would cap it or completely refuse to pay it. Now the NIH will no be so accommodating. The huge administrative overhead is explained by the fact that over the year, administrative personnel in major universities has grown to far outnumber faculty, researchers and clinicians. Administrations at universities tend to follow extremely rigid and complex processes for almost anything. Most decisions and actions are regulated through a slow, rigid and scrutinizing process, either through a deep chain of command or through commissions that are slow to gather and have to debate every decision. This has been ongoing for a while at major universities because of virtually no negative feedback loop. The university could always raise the administrative overhead to pay for any new administrative processes it decides to implement. Major universities also do other things than research, and teaching. They are gigantic institutions with gigantic ramifications. Now more than ever, universities cannot afford to lower the standards on research. Because if they do, their faculty will not be less eligible for grants, and they might even loose the 15% that the NIH has promised to pay. The most likely outcome is swift lay offs of administrative personnel and the termination of many programs that are not conducive to outstanding research. Then, they will start doing more fundraising towards private donors, some of which already refuse to pay administrative overheads, requiring their money to go directly towards research. Institutions will also get closer to the industry, and will try to promote more startups, and spin-offs. But that will require major changes in administrative processes, money allocation and a lot more flexibility on intellectual propriety.
x.com/NIH/status/188800475939695...

AI is a Big Geopolitical Issue 9950

Tariq Daouda, 10 mon.
500 Billion dollars to keep the USA the number one power in AI followed by Deepseek whose creators claim has been trained on lower grade hardware, and now the AI summit in Paris. Modern AI is a breakthrough perhaps of the same magnitude as the steam machine or electricity, perhaps even bigger. It touches everything and, most importantly, for the first time it allows for the mechanization of intellectual work. Previous industrial major breakthroughs were focused on automatizing physical labor, AI offers the potential of automatizing the mind. The implications are hard to comprehend, but what is sure is that no nation wants to be left behind. The world of AI is segmented on a few pillars: 1 - The theory and software: mostly public and open-source 2 - The talent that is rare: Becoming a top tier talent in AI takes time. Being able to use off-the-self AI designed by other people is not enough to drive breakthrough 3 - The infrastructure hardware: Most importantly GPUs that are virtually all controlled by one US company, NVIDIA 4 - Electrical Power: Modern AI requires datacenter that consume astonishing amounts of electricity It is on these fronts that the big battles over AI supremacy and autonomy will be fought. Laying these pillars also highlights the dominance of the US: it is the first on every single one. The US has the top universities and AI companies. This Naturally translates to more talent available. The US has the only company capable of making high-end GPUs, and the US has the most electricity available. Other nations should wisely pick their battles and focus where they can make most impact. France for example, with it's nuclear energy and engineering culture could make it's mark, and Germany is already a leader in semiconductors. There is potential in Europe, the major question is will regulations and fiscal regimes adapt fast enough to allow for rapid technological growth. Even low and middle income countries could make a dent and enjoy the AI boom. Morocco is positioning itself as an electricity producer, and all countries could work on education and skill levels. The time where people had to leave the country to offer their services abroad is long gone. The internet has no borders, which also mean the brain drain does not need to happen! It's not impossible for a country to become a top tier exporter of high quality AI services. Again for it to happen, cross country work regulations, and exchange rate controls must be heavily simplified or completely removed. Final words, If anything the Deepseek story is interesting because it potentially expands the market for NVIDIA. If the story is true, it means that the market is now bigger, not smaller because lower grade GPUs have suddenly become more useful, without questioning the supremacy of the last generations of NVIDIA's AI workhorses.

[Science #1] The Billion-Dollar Question: How Much Is Your Data Worth in the Age of AI? Shapley Value in Data Economics 10079

Tima EL, 10 mon.
In today’s AI-driven world, data is often compared to oil. However, not all data holds the same intrinsic value. While some datasets are critical for the performance of AI models, others contribute little or no enhancement. As organizations pour vast resources into acquiring, processing, and leveraging data, the ability to systematically assess its worth has become a fundamental challenge. **The Need for Intelligent Data Valuation** When companies acquire data, it’s not enough to simply consider its quantity. They must also evaluate its quality, uniqueness, and relevance to the problem at hand. Equally important is understanding the relationships between datasets—whether they complement each other or act as substitutes. This distinction plays a pivotal role in making cost-effective decisions. For example, a bank seeking to improve its fraud detection capabilities might consider purchasing two datasets: *-* **Transaction History (Dataset A): ** Records of past financial transactions, which may reveal patterns indicative of fraud. *- ***User Behavior Data (Dataset B): ** Behavioral analytics, such as login habits and spending behaviors, which can help identify anomalies. If combining both datasets leads to a significant improvement in fraud detection accuracy, they are considered complementary—together, they provide more value than the sum of their individual contributions. However, if one dataset alone offers nearly the same predictive power as the other, the second dataset becomes a substitute, diminishing its marginal value. This distinction is crucial. Companies can waste millions on redundant or low-value data if they fail to evaluate dataset interactions properly. A deeper understanding of these relationships helps ensure that only the most valuable data is acquired, processed, and used to drive AI-driven decision-making. **Assessing the True Economic Worth of Data with Shapley Value** To address this challenge, the **Shapley value**—a concept rooted in cooperative game theory—provides a fair and consistent method to assign value to datasets based on their contributions to the overall performance of an AI model. In this context, the "game" refers to model performance, and the "players" are the datasets used to train it. The Shapley value acts as a metric to evaluate the contribution of each dataset to the model’s performance. **General Concept of the Shapley Value** The Shapley value distributes the total "payoff" (or performance improvement) of a cooperative game (i.e., model accuracy) among the "players" (datasets) according to their marginal contributions. To calculate the Shapley value for a dataset, we consider all possible combinations of datasets and evaluate how much the addition of that particular dataset enhances the model’s performance. Let’s consider an example: Fraud Detection System: Imagine a fraud detection system with three datasets: *-* Transaction history (Dataset A) *-* User behavior data (Dataset B) *-* Geolocation data (Dataset C) To calculate the Shapley value, we would: 1. Evaluate the model’s performance with each dataset, both individually and in combinations 2. Determine the marginal contribution of each dataset by seeing how much it improves the model’s performance when added to the other datasets. 3. Calculate the average contribution of each dataset across all possible combinations. The Shapley value ensures that each dataset is credited according to its true contribution to enhancing the fraud detection system. This methodology evaluates the worth of data not only based on its individual impact but also by considering how it interacts with the other datasets.

Striking the perfect balance? Mastering academic demands while thriving in the personal life. 9752

Safaa Ouahid, 11 mon.
- Science - Society - Lifestyle -
1.4 min read.
With the hustle of academia, it’s very easy to focus only on what’s next—a looming deadline, the next exam, or an upcoming conference. Before you know it, those academic demands can creep into every corner of your life, making it tough to separate “work time” from “me time.” That’s why setting boundaries is so important. Whether it’s not answering emails after a certain hour or taking a proper lunch break, clear limits protect your mental health and nurture your relationships. Making Time for What Matters: One of the best ways to balance your academic workload with a fulfilling personal life is by using solid time management skills. It goes beyond just buying a planner—you have to create a realistic schedule, set achievable goals, and regularly check your progress. When you block out specific times for studying or research, it frees your mind to fully enjoy your personal pursuits later. For example, I started writing down all my meetings, and deadlines on a simple calendar, then penciled in “personal time” for reading, relaxing, or a quick break. Having those scheduled moments made it easier to focus on my tasks when it was actually “work time.” Learning to Say “No”: Another challenge I faced was learning to set limits with people around me. In the past, I’d say “yes” to every study group or committee meeting—leaving little space for rest. But saying “no” is sometimes the healthiest choice you can make. If a project isn’t urgent or a meeting doesn’t truly need your input, it’s okay to pass. By politely declining, you protect your mental health and keep your workload manageable. Small Breaks, Big Difference: Taking short breaks was also a lifesaver for me. Even a five-minute walk or a quick chat with a friend can recharge your brain, especially when you’re buried in readings or writing papers. When I tried to power through for hours without pausing, I ended up feeling overwhelmed and frustrated. Now, I schedule small breaks throughout my day. Celebrating Small Wins: Finally, I learned the power of celebrating small milestones. After finishing a tough chapter or hitting a key research goal, I give myself a little treat—like a coffee date with a friend or a short break. Recognizing these small wins reminds me that progress comes in steps, not leaps. It also keeps me motivated for the next challenge. By honoring each success, no matter how small, I stay positive and energized, even when juggling academic deadlines and personal responsibilities.

What I Learned in 2024 During My PhD (Beyond Academia) 10853

Anas Bedraoui, 11 mon.
- Science - Society - Lifestyle -
1.3 min read.
When people ask what I’ve learned during my PhD, they usually think it’s all about science—reading papers, running experiments, gathering data. But honestly? That’s barely 20% of what I’ve learned this past year. The real lessons have nothing to do with lab work. It’s more about how you plan. I’ve learned to pause, think things through, and focus on long-term goals. Not everything needs a fast answer, and not every problem needs to be fixed right away. The best decisions come when I keep my emotions in check and focus on strategy. Waiting is tough. Progress can be painfully slow. But I’ve learned that good things take time. Getting frustrated doesn’t help—staying calm does. Spending hours working alone makes you figure out who you really are—what motivates you, what stresses you out, and how much you can handle before you reach your limit. Some tasks felt pointless—reading papers I wasn’t excited about or presenting when I wasn’t ready—but those things made me better. The things I dreaded the most taught me the most. I’ve also realized that communication is about more than speaking—it’s about making people understand. Breaking down complex ideas is just as important as knowing them. How you explain things shapes how people see your work. And thinking critically isn’t just for science—it helps you understand the world better, question things, and spot what others might miss. I stopped waiting to feel “ready.” Confidence doesn’t come from knowing everything—it comes from showing up, trusting what you’ve learned, and getting better each time. I’ve also started thinking of my future like a game of chess—every move counts. Emotional decisions don’t last, but careful ones do. I’ve learned you can’t force your way through everything. Sometimes, you need to know when to speak, when to listen, and when to take a step back. Being diplomatic doesn’t mean you’re weak—it means you’re smart enough to handle things without making everything a fight. These lessons weren’t in any textbook. They came from real moments—the tough ones, the quiet ones, and the ones that felt overwhelming. It’s more than learning skills—it’s understanding yourself and becoming stronger with every step forward. Still, you don’t have to figure everything out alone. When you seek advice from someone who knows you and genuinely wants you to grow, you can skip some of the slow, painful steps. They help you see blind spots and make your process faster and smoother.