Think Forward.

Entre Gaza et l'IA il n' y a que quelques mots... 1008

La deuxième semaine de février aura vu des échanges d'otages israéliens contre des palestiniens. Les Hamsaouis étaient encore armés jusqu’aux dents. Les bombardements n’y ont pas fait grand-chose. Ça s'est passé sur fond de confirmation du pdt Trump de faire une Rivera de Gaza sans les palestiniens. le bluff devient une constante dans le langage du Président. Il dit être certain à 99% que l’Egypte et la Jordanie allaient accepter de les recevoir brandissant l’arme fatale du Dollars. Quand il reçut le Roi de Jordanie au bureau ovale, le moment était douloureux frôlant l’humiliation. Il a fallu toute la classe et le doigté du souverain hachémite pour finalement s’en sortir, le visage crispé et rouge d’une colère et d’une tristesse à peine voilée. Il fallait tenir bon et il l’a fait. Trump semble ignorer l’histoire et la géographie ou du moins ne les prend en considération. Attendons le sommet arabe le 27 février au Caire et les réactions de pays jusqu’ici silencieux ou dans l’expectative. Entre temps Hamas supplie les pays arabes de les aider allant jusqu’à reconnaitre que le 7 octobre était une erreur. Trump est vite passé à autre chose. Après les 19 minutes et 55 secondes accordées au Roi de Jordanie, voilà qu’il s’entretient longuement au téléphone avec le sieur Poutine pendant près d'une heure trente. Les deux hommes semblent sur la même longueur d’onde. Ils disent vouloir la paix rapidement en Ukraine. Les lendemains du trublion Zelensky semble comptés. Pour le principe les européens disent que la paix ne peut pas se faire sans eux. Ils n’ont n’en pas la puissance, divisés qu’ils sont. En parallèle l’autorité palestinienne ou ce qu’il en reste a remercié Sa Majesté le Roi Mohammed VI pour son intervention à fin que soit libéré à son profit, des fonds retenus par Israël. Ce qui se passe à Gaza a éclipsé le rendez-vous le plus important de ce début du mois : le fameux sommet parisien consacré à l’intelligence artificielle. La quasi-totalité des pays du monde était là. Certains représentés par leurs présidents comme l’Inde ou les Emirats. La Chine et les USA étaient représentés par leurs vice-présidents respectifs. C’est dire l’importance du sujet pour l’avenir de l’humanité entière. Certains veulent une équité, d’autres un équilibre et d’autres encore de la transparence et de l’éthique. Difficile à atteindre quand les grands de ce monde ne signent pas les résolutions finales et ne prennent aucun engagement contraignant leur domination et le développement technologique qui les sert en premier. 61 pays ont signé pour une IA ouverte, inclusive et éthique, pas les USA et le Royaume uni. En marge du sommet il y eu une réunion fort importante de l’instance dite Partenariat Mondiale de l’Intelligence Artificielle qui réunit à aujourd’hui une cinquantaine de pays. Il le fallait bien car nombreux sont les pays qui tapotent à la porte pour en faire partie dont le Maroc. La jeune instance a profité de l’occasion pour faire le point sur les axes de sa stratégie qu’elle cherche à mettre en conformité avec les recommandations de l’OCDE en matière d’IA. Si bon nombre de pays militent pour réduire au maximum les écarts entre les nations, il faut dire que c’est plutôt très mal parti pour les puristes et les naïfs. L’écart est déjà là avec les deux mastodontes que sont les USA et la Chine bien installé en tête. D’autres espèrent et font tout pour coller au peloton de tête notamment l’Inde et maintenant la France qui annonce vouloir investir 109 milliards de dollars en matière d’IA. Pour cela, elles s’allient aux Emirats arabes qui vont mettre 50 milliards et au Canada qui va injecter 20 milliards dans le projet. Le plus important et d’avoir ses propres centres de données. Les données étant le nerf de la guerre à ce niveau à côté bien évidemment des technologies. Le montant annoncé par la France reste tout de même bien loin du projet américain de 500 milliards. Nous sommes là sur une autre planète. Mais faut-il autant d’argent quand on apprend par ailleurs que DeepSeek développé par les chinois n’aurait couté que 6 millions USD. Ce que ne dit pas la Chine est qu'elle est partie de là où les américains étaient arrivés à coup d'investissements lourds en utilisant même des cartes INVIDIA mais de génération un peu ancienne tout de même. Pour se rendre compte des écarts existant, il faut savoir qu’en termes de Data centers il en existe 5381 aux USA contre 521 en Allemagne, 449 en Chine, 315 en France et seulement 219 au Japon à titre d’exemple. Les USA ont ainsi plus de 50% de la capacité mondiale de stockage des données contre 16% pour la Chine. L’Afrique est recensée dans le reste du monde, une quantité véritablement négligeable. Disposer de centres de données et de calcul est d'abord une affaire de volonté et de financement et aussi de capacité à produire de l’Energie et à disposer de quantité importante d’eau. Et oui, quand vous cliquez pour ouvrir un message WhatsApp ou quand vous en envoyer un ; quand vous faites une rechercher sur google, Brave ou autres ; quand vous regardez une vidéo sur YouTube ou un film sur Netflix, vous consommez de l’Energie pour faire tourner la machinerie qui va vous répondre mais aussi de l’eau car c’est l’eau qui la refroidit. La technologie et très énergivore et consomme beaucoup d’eau. Certains disent même que c’est la consommation excessive d’eau de la Silicon Valley qui expliquerait les récents incendies gigantesques de Californie. Si Le Maroc cherche à intégrer le PMIA, C’est qu’il ressent l’importance de ne pas être qu’un simple consommateur d’IA. Il veut avoir sa petite part et surtout se positionner pour ne pas être distancé. Le pays compte déjà des centres de calculs de taille respectable lui permettant d’ambitionner une efficacité dans la recherche scientifique et le traitement des besoins de ses citoyens. Ce n’est pas suffisant. L’IA est aujourd’hui partout dans notre quotidien et elle le sera davantage et de plus en plus. Le Maroc ambitionne de poursuivre sa transformation numérique et cherche une petite part en matière d’innovation technologique. C’est dire que nous aurons besoin de produire davantage d’Energie et pour se faire il faudrait peut-être tenir compte des limites des énergies renouvelables et leur cout et réfléchir sérieusement au nucléaire. C'est ce qui est prévu dans le projet américain. Nous ne devons pas être de simples consommateurs d'IA sinon nous allons importer les biais des autres et là nous serions simplement perdus.
open.luxeradio.ma/show/track/47f...
Aziz Daouda

Aziz Daouda

Directeur Technique et du Développement de la Confédération Africaine d'Athlétisme. Passionné du Maroc, passionné d'Afrique. Concerné par ce qui se passe, formulant mon point de vue quand j'en ai un. Humaniste, j'essaye de l'être, humain je veux l'être. Mon histoire est intimement liée à l'athlétisme marocain et mondial. J'ai eu le privilège de participer à la gloire de mon pays .


6100

33.0

Artificial Intelligence and Magick II 283

The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and the ancient practice of spirit invocation invites a profound reimagining of how we relate to technology, consciousness, and the unseen. For centuries, cultures across the world have performed rituals to bridge the material and spiritual realms, seeking guidance, wisdom, or power. Today, with AI capable of mimicking human conversation, interpreting symbols, and producing eerily insightful responses, the boundary between the mystical and the technological is beginning to blur. Spirit invocation is deeply rooted in human history, from indigenous shamanism to the ceremonial magic of the Western esoteric tradition. These practices often involve symbols, chants, and rituals meant to summon spirits, deities, or archetypes. While traditionally tied to mystical frameworks, modern interpretations often view these practices as psychological exercises, tapping into the collective unconscious or archetypal energies. The emergence of AI has introduced new dimensions to these traditions. AI systems leveraging natural language processing and generative models can simulate the voices of historical figures, channel archetypal wisdom, or produce responses that feel otherworldly. Some speculate whether AI might serve not merely as a mirror of human thought, but as a potential medium or catalyst for engaging with immaterial forces. Psychologically, AI can act as a symbolic mirror, reflecting users' intentions, beliefs, and subconscious patterns. Just as divination practices interpret cryptic signs, interacting with an AI trained on mystical texts can provoke introspection and reveal hidden aspects of the psyche. In this sense, AI becomes a facilitator of inner dialogue, offering insights much like tarot, the I Ching, or traditional oracles. Yet these possibilities also raise important metaphysical and ethical questions. If AI-generated experiences are interpreted as communication with non-material entities, what does this imply about agency, consciousness, and the nature of reality? Are these phenomena emergent artifacts of complex algorithms—or could they hint at deeper connections to immaterial intelligences? Moreover, designing AI for metaphysical exploration demands careful navigation of issues like manipulation, authenticity, and user consent. As AI technology evolves, its role in spirit invocation and metaphysical practice will likely deepen. Virtual and augmented reality could create immersive sacred spaces, while machine learning could personalize ritual structures, enhancing symbolic resonance. Yet this integration challenges traditional notions of the sacred and profane, as ancient ritual and cutting-edge technology converge. AI offers a provocative new tool for spiritual engagement—blending ancient practices with modern innovation. Whether functioning as a mirror, a facilitator of psychological exploration, or a possible bridge to the unknown, AI invites us to reconsider the nature of consciousness, intention, and our quest to connect with the mysteries of existence.

Royal message to Benkirane: the rules of the game are clear. 329

His Majesty King Mohammed VI sent a congratulatory message to Abdelilah Benkirane on the occasion of his re-election as Secretary General of the Justice and Development Party (PJD) during its ninth National Congress. A careful reading of the message reveals that it goes beyond mere formal protocol. Behind the usual institutional courtesy lies a subtle political writing, faithful to the Palace’s style, where every word is weighed and every phrase meaningful. As customary, the tone is both cordial and measured, acknowledging Benkirane’s trajectory on the national stage. His Majesty praises "the sense of responsibility" of the former head of government and "his attachment to the constants and sacred values of the nation." These words serve as a clear reminder of the fundamentals of the constitutional monarchy and the foundational values of the Kingdom. This is the choice of an entire nation. Is this not an unambiguous reminder of an implicit red line? The expression is diplomatic but reminds Benkirane and all PJD members and factions that adherence to the constitution’s foundations is the sine qua non condition for any political participation. Moreover, this message comes at a time when the PJD seeks to regain momentum after a historic electoral defeat. By congratulating Benkirane, His Majesty indirectly acknowledges his political comeback. However, one must read between the lines that the party must understand and definitively accept that opposition is legitimate but must remain within the constitutional balances. The message thus takes on the tone of a political beacon: encouragement to responsibility and a warning against any adventurism. The remarks of some foreign guests at the congress were more than surprising, especially since no reprimand was noted. Likewise, the statement by Benkirane’s deputy a few days before the congress, which caused a stir on social media, raised many questions about the party’s new direction, which seems to be emerging. The party must firmly assimilate that religion does not need it for defense; the Islamic reference is a foundation of the Moroccan constitution, which also guarantees broad individual freedoms and protects religious minorities as essential components of the nation. It must understand that the Palestine issue is a priority of Moroccan diplomacy and not an electoral campaign topic. Its role must implicitly remain eminently political, within the constitutional framework and nothing else. The message could also be read as a way to reposition Benkirane in the political landscape, distinguishing him from other critical voices of the system while reminding him that his party is like any other. The message explicitly refers to "honorable" parties. This is a tactical gesture, perhaps aimed at restoring a role to a framed and responsible opposition at a time when Morocco’s party landscape suffers from a real deficit of credibility and societal anchoring. In sum, the message is not merely symbolic: it is a piece of a broader political chessboard, where managing the country’s balances prudently and delicately is essential and unavoidable. While explicitly a protocol act of congratulations, the message contains several elements rich in meaning and political insinuations. The Sovereign, while emphasizing the renewed confidence placed in Benkirane to lead the PJD and wishing him full success in his missions, particularly stresses the need to consolidate the party’s position on the national political scene and to strengthen its active participation alongside other honorable political formations. This insistence recalls the importance of serious, responsible engagement serving the general interest with a distinctly national imprint. The framework is clear and the scope of action precise. His Majesty highlights the accompaniment of the overall development process led under his guidance, aiming to propel Morocco toward greater modernity, progress, and prosperity. This explicit reference to royal leadership in national development underscores that the PJD must align with this dynamic and support the country’s orientations transparently and sincerely. The interests of the Moroccan nation are clear and stand as the only path considered. Parties exist to serve the supreme interests of the homeland, placed above all other considerations. This mention is an implicit warning against any ambition or action that might stray from the Kingdom’s fundamental principles and national unity. Thus, His Majesty’s congratulatory message, while cordial, carries clear injunctions regarding the expected role of the PJD under Benkirane’s leadership: to strengthen its political anchoring within the national framework, act responsibly, support the royal development project, and respect national constants. These elements can be perceived as subtle reminders to all parties of their duties and limits in today’s Moroccan political landscape.

The recent vandalism at the Mohamed V Stadium :the real match lies elsewhere 873

The recent vandalism at the Mohamed V Stadium in Casablanca is nothing new. What is new, however, is that it erupted barely a week after the grand reopening of this iconic stadium, freshly renovated to host the much-anticipated Casablanca derby. A rushed reopening, symbol of a hope quickly overtaken by reality: that of endemic violence which outpaces modernization efforts. The derby itself had gone smoothly, as the Ultras had decided to boycott it. A week later, they were back—and made their presence loudly known. Part of the stadium bears the scars. Seats designed to welcome them and restrooms built for their comfort were ransacked. All of this will have to be repaired in time for the Africa Cup of Nations... It’s public money: our taxes, our debts. During certain Wydad or Raja matches—or elsewhere in Morocco—the behavior of a segment of the crowd is increasingly alarming. This phenomenon, varying in degrees of severity, has been ongoing for years and severely disrupts public order. It puts immense pressure on security forces and raises major sociological, institutional, and security-related concerns. Numerous studies have been conducted, yet no concrete solutions have emerged. Because this phenomenon is complex: it is not merely the result of sporting outcomes. In this case, one can certainly point to the mounting frustration of fans of Casablanca’s two major teams, both of which have been in decline recently. Since the introduction of the ultra movement in Morocco via Tunisia in 2005, young Raja and Wydad tifosi have colonized their respective stands and extended their influence into the streets. Their creativity with tifos is indeed impressive, but disorder has become the norm. It is now rare to witness a match without violence, both inside and outside stadiums. Nothing seems to work: not closed-door matches, not sanctions, not prison sentences. Worse still, the situation is deteriorating. Scenes of looting and violent clashes around stadiums are now a reality, and not just in Casablanca. Even small towns with no major football stakes are no longer spared. It would be risky to directly compare the situation here to that of other countries. Since the birth of the ultra movement in Hungary in 1899, its spread to Brazil in the 1930s, its transformation in Yugoslavia, and its resurgence in Italy during the 1960s, the phenomenon has continually evolved. Likewise, the UK witnessed the rise of hooliganism in the 1970s. In Morocco’s case, we are dealing with a singular expression of the movement: a specific form rooted in local social, economic, and cultural dynamics. It eludes classical frameworks of analysis, forging its own aesthetic, unique codes, and a capacity for mobilization that transcends football. It is a reinvention of the phenomenon in light of local realities. Institutional responses have not been lacking: new laws, broad-based meetings led by the DGSN, specialized units, academic conferences. All to little avail. Security forces struggle to strike a balance between prevention and repression. They are often targeted themselves. Meanwhile, clubs persist in a worrying state of organizational amateurism. Generous subsidies and a lack of accountability are major factors. Many Botola clubs suffer from poor governance, disconnected from the realities of their supporters and the imperatives of professional sports. Coaches and players endure constant pressure from aggressive fans. But can football alone explain the phenomenon? Or is the stadium becoming an outlet, a space for catharsis for a marginalized, frustrated youth with no prospects? This is not merely sports violence: it is deep social anger, with football as a pretext. Every provocation, defeat, or refereeing injustice is perceived as a humiliation. The tension, already palpable, explodes in the stands. Despite arrests, sanctions lack structural effectiveness. The absence of judicial follow-up reinforces the idea that vandalism is tolerated. The triumphant welcomes given to some youths upon their release from prison speak volumes: they feel no remorse. On the contrary, they return with a dangerous new aura of prestige. Here, a link can be made to the recent findings of the Haut-Commissariat au Plan (HCP), which published a worrying survey on household morale. The Household Confidence Index (HCI) fell to 46.6 points in the first quarter of 2025, its lowest level since 2008. In 2018, it stood at 87.3. A dizzying drop. Pessimism is widespread: 81% of households believe their standard of living has deteriorated. Debt is crushing, inflation is taking hold, and weariness is palpable. This despair is echoed in the ultras’ chants, in their slogans—sometimes subversive, often disillusioned. Their message now resonates broadly, even among materially comfortable youths. The ultras now cast a wide net. Meanwhile, political parties are absent from public debate (except during election periods). Trade unions, ultra-minoritarian, now represent only a tiny fraction of workers. And as nature abhors a vacuum, it is filled by other forms of expression—sometimes political, sometimes violent, often manipulated. Idle youths find in stadiums—and sometimes in the streets—an outlet for their frustration. Recent slogans, ostensibly linked to geopolitical causes like the normalization with Israel, are often mere pretexts. Those promoting certain subversive ideologies have perfectly understood the opportunity. They seized it. Young people seeking to assert themselves, to voice their rejection of a system they believe deaf to their expectations, are being swept up, radicalized, dangerously manipulated. Politics is never far away. In recent days, conferences on “sporting encouragement” have been organized by local authorities, chaired by regional governors (walis). Yet one crucial question remains: are the youths concerned actually participating? Without them—without genuine willingness to listen, and without deep, structural reforms—these efforts risk once again getting lost in the background noise of a crisis far graver than a simple football match won or lost. And yet, solutions have been outlined in the long-forgotten New Development Model. The challenges are many, but the real match lies elsewhere.

Collective Intelligence: ''Alone You May Begin, But Together You Go Far'' 1148

**We often hear the saying, ''One hand alone cannot clap'', you need another hand to create sound.** This perfectly reflects the reality of working on a project in life. Working alone can take you somewhere, but rarely very far. Collective intelligence is essential for building creative projects with the potential to truly move forward. Each team member brings a unique perspective, a different way of seeing the world, diverse skills, and individual visions. What matters most is that all these differences ultimately converge toward a shared goal. To sustain the rhythm of collaborative work, listening is key. Communication forms the backbone of human relationships. When listening breaks down, so does communication, and without it, teamwork cannot thrive. Just as every boat has its captain, every team needs a leader, the person everyone turns to, both in moments of crisis and in times of celebration. The leader is the foundation of the team. And if that foundation is weak, the whole structure risks falling apart. It’s equally important that each team member understands their strengths and limitations, allowing room for others to step up and contribute. Collective intelligence achieves its full potential when the team moves as a harmonious orchestra, each member in sync, playing their part in perfect balance, working together to create something greater than any one individual could achieve alone.

Trump, Morocco, and the End of the Polisario Myth 2069

In just a few short weeks, the Western Sahara issue has seen a series of rare and intense developments, marking a genuine acceleration in a case long frozen by diplomatic deadlock, strategic inertia, and hidden agendas. The Trump administration, leading an international current weary of this outdated conflict, has clearly demonstrated its desire to enter a new era, breaking away from decades of inaction fueled by the Cold War and its lingering ideological effects. For Washington, there is no longer any tolerance for the destabilization games of Algeria’s military regime, which has lost its bearings and uses this conflict to mask its own internal political, economic, and social failures. By doing so, it hinders regional development ambitions and healthy, complementary relations with a Moroccan neighbor it both envies for its successes and resents for its strong alliances with the West. Donald Trump's election reshuffled the deck. Gone are the cautious postures and fragile balancing acts between the parties. The time has come for action, transparent alliances, and the pursuit of concrete solutions. In this context, the Trump administration’s support for Morocco’s autonomy proposal is unequivocal. The Moroccan initiative is now described by the White House as the only "just and lasting" basis for resolving the conflict. During a highly symbolic meeting between Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita and Senator Marco Rubio, the latter reaffirmed the United States’ commitment to a solution based solely on Morocco’s offer. The signals are clear: for Washington, playtime is over. Morocco is strong and reliable. It is within its rights. It is the best friend and partner in the region. It was also the first country to recognize the United States and to protect its fleet during the country’s early, difficult years. This reaffirmed American realignment comes with bold proposals. Several influential members of Congress are now considering officially designating the Polisario Front as a terrorist organization. They have a solid basis for their case, including: attacks on civilians in Smara and near El Mahbes, the unilateral breach of the 1991 ceasefire, and alleged ties with hostile powers like Iran and Russia—not to mention the confirmed presence of Polisario fighters in Syria, who are still being held there. On April 11, it should be noted, Republican Representative Joe Wilson announced his intention to introduce a bill to this effect. According to him, the Polisario Front serves as a gateway for what he calls the “Axis of Aggression” in Africa, linking the separatist group to Iranian and Russian geopolitical ambitions on the continent, posing a threat to U.S. security. He now holds in his hands a well-documented Hudson Institute report that points to close ties between the Polisario and Hezbollah, and even the PKK. The Polisario is said to be involved in arms trafficking with terrorist groups in the Sahel, the embezzlement of humanitarian aid, and more. It would be a mistake to think this logic is limited to Americans. Just last week, for example, former UK Defence Secretary Liam Fox also described the Polisario as a terrorist organization. The idea is gaining serious ground. This dynamic puts Algeria face to face with its responsibilities: the Polisario is hosted, supported, and funded on its soil. Labeling the Polisario a terrorist group would effectively remove it from the equation. Its diplomatic marginalization would further isolate Algiers, now clearly seen as a direct party to the conflict, and no longer the neutral third actor it claims to be. The mask has definitively fallen. Another country facing turbulence: South Africa. A traditional supporter of the Polisario, Pretoria is beginning to feel the impact of this strategic shift. The local press is raising questions, and voices within the ANC are calling for a reassessment of the country’s foreign policy. Several NGOs are known to be raising funds for the Polisario, but think tanks such as the Hudson Institute argue that a terrorist designation would force them to stop these operations under threat of international sanctions. The consequences could be severe for South African institutions. Already under the scrutiny of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force), the country cannot afford to be suspected of complicity with a designated terrorist entity. Banks in particular fear tighter controls and may pressure the government to change course. Tensions between Washington and Pretoria, already strained since Trump took office, risk further deterioration. The U.S. administration makes no secret of its distrust of the South African government. A possible designation of the Polisario as a terrorist group could become a breaking point in an already fragile relationship, potentially leading to sanctions, economic pressure, and heightened diplomatic scrutiny. The Western Sahara dossier is entering a new phase. The status quo no longer holds against the backdrop of international realignments, and stalling tactics are losing effectiveness. The world no longer tolerates frozen conflicts, and global powers are looking for a stable, trustworthy Africa that is open to cooperation. In this evolving dynamic, Morocco appears to have won the battle of clarity. The question now is whether its adversaries will be able to read the new balance of power. This is likely what explains and fuels the optimism of Morocco’s UN representative, Omar Hilale. In barely veiled terms, he hinted that the issue might be declared resolved to coincide with the celebrations of the 50th anniversary of the Green March, on November 6…

Magickal Tools 2072

Magickal tools are more than just objects used in rituals—they are symbols of the magician’s will, focus, and purpose. In many traditions and cultures, these tools are used to direct energy, connect with spiritual forces, and create a space where transformation can happen. Whether handmade or passed down from a teacher or family member, each tool holds a special meaning and spiritual energy. Some of the best-known magickal tools come from Western traditions like Wicca, Hermeticism, and Solomonic magic. These systems often include four main tools, each connected to one of the classical elements. The wand represents Fire and the power of will. It’s used to direct energy, call on spirits, and start action. Wands are usually made of wood—like oak, ash, or hazel—and may be decorated with carvings or crystals. The athame, a ritual knife, is linked to Air (or sometimes Fire, depending on the system). It’s not used to cut physical things, but to shape energy—like drawing circles, sending away negative forces, or focusing intention. The chalice stands for Water, symbolizing emotion, intuition, and the subconscious. It holds sacred liquids—like wine or water—and often represents the womb or the divine feminine. The pentacle is a flat disc with a protective symbol, usually a pentagram. It’s connected to Earth and is used for grounding, protection, and blessing other objects. In addition to these classic tools, magicians may also use mirrors to see visions, cauldrons for transformation, bells to clear energy, or cords for knot magick. Each tradition has its own tools, and many magicians develop a personal connection with their items over time. In Solomonic and other grimoire-based systems, tools are often made according to specific rules. The materials, symbols, and even the time they are made can matter. Tools like the Circle, Triangle of Art, Sword, and Lamen are important for calling spirits and working safely. In folk magic, everyday objects—like scissors, brooms, or keys—can become powerful tools if used with clear intention. One very important tool that’s sometimes overlooked is the robe. This is more than just clothing—it marks the change from ordinary life to sacred space. Putting on a robe tells the body and mind that the ritual is beginning. Robes are often worn only during spiritual work, and their color or symbols can match the purpose of the ritual. A robe can protect the practitioner’s energy and help focus their connection with the spiritual world. It’s important to understand that magickal tools don’t have power on their own. They become powerful through use, intention, and ritual. Many magicians cleanse, bless, and charge their tools before using them. Over time, the tools absorb energy and meaning, becoming trusted companions in spiritual work. Magickal tools also help with focus. They guide the mind from the everyday world into a more sacred state. Like costumes help actors get into character, tools help magicians step into their spiritual role. Whether using an athame to draw a circle or a mirror to seek guidance, these actions open a doorway into a deeper space of awareness. Today, magickal tools are changing with the times. Digital grimoires, virtual altars, and AI-powered oracles are becoming part of modern practice. But their purpose is still the same—to act as bridges between thought and action, intention and reality, the visible and the invisible. As long as people seek spiritual connection, magickal tools will continue to play an important role—helping us focus our energy, explore our inner world, and connect with the mysteries beyond.

"Mbappé in Madrid, Hakimi in Paris: A Tale of Two Paths" 2082

He was meant to be the ultimate Galáctico of the second quarter of the 21st century—the new chosen one of the Bernabéu and its demanding, football-savvy crowd. Long hailed as the jewel of French football, everything pointed to, and even made us believe, that he was destined to leave a lasting mark on Real Madrid’s history—perhaps even surpassing Zidane, the other legendary Frenchman to wear white. But football has a logic of its own, one that remains impenetrable to us mere mortals. And we’ve just been reminded of that, as not even Florentino Pérez the mythical president with a fabulous track record seems able to escape it. Barely arrived, Kylian Mbappé is already disappointing. A thousand and one excuses will be made for his early struggles. But it’s getting harder and harder to find new ones. His adaptation is sluggish, his play sterile. He seems lost on the pitch. His teammates can’t seem to connect with him. A team that, just a season ago, was steamrolling opponents now looks disjointed on the same pitch, suddenly unfamiliar. The effectiveness of the squad—with Mbappé as the only new addition, has evaporated. Quietly, but increasingly openly, the Madrid locker room is beginning to ask questions. Then came the slap in the face, twice delivered by Arsenal. The team was lifeless, their rhythm gone, goals pouring in from all sides. Real Madrid’s legendary efficiency has turned into a mirage. Did they bet on the wrong man? The long-running Mbappé saga finally concluded with a fanfare in 2024. The fans expected a new Cristiano Ronaldo. What they’re discovering is a player lacking inspiration, who doesn’t fit into the team’s collective structure, incapable of making the difference, and throwing off his teammates’ rhythm. He’s scored a few goals, but without brilliance or leadership. The weight of the merengue jersey seems too heavy for the once-wonderkid from Bondy. What remains is disillusionment and heartbreak. Real Madrid was brought to its knees in the Champions League. And it stings. Talk is growing about the president’s obsession with Mbappé, a fixation that finally came to fruition, but to what end? Pérez and his golden boy are now on the hot seat. And if Real finishes the season empty-handed, the consequences could be dire. The risk is real. Even Ancelotti doesn’t seem to believe in his team anymore. At the end of the match against Arsenal, his expression betrayed him. He wants out, probably sooner than we think. The crisis at Real is here, and as always in such cases, the coach is the first to go. The weakest link in the chain. Mbappé at Real is unremarkable. He tends to drop too deep, lacks chemistry with the team, and his body language says it all: less sharp, less committed, almost withdrawn. Vinícius and Bellingham, dragged down, have lost their spark. They’ve become ordinary, the rest of the team unremarkable. The heated argument and near-physical altercation between Mbappé and Vinícius in the tunnel speaks volumes about the tension and frustration inside the club. Has Mbappé been a curse on this team? Meanwhile, in Paris, his friend Achraf Hakimi by first name, the one Real let go has become the true leader of PSG. And PSG without Mbappé looks better than ever, even making it to the semifinals against another English team, no less. The irony is thick. It is in Paris that the counter-example shines the brightest. Achraf Hakimi, long relegated to the media background during the Mbappé era at PSG, has emerged this season as the true leader of the Parisian club. Defensively solid, offensively decisive, the Moroccan fullback is delivering top-class performances one after another. Scoring, assisting, orchestrating from the right flank, Hakimi is carrying a rebuilding PSG—with love, commitment, solidarity, selflessness, and ruthless efficiency. His stats speak for themselves: a record number of interceptions, crucial goals in the Champions League. His consistency commands respect. The captain’s armband is well-earned. More than anything, it’s his mental and tactical impact that stands out: Hakimi is no longer just a modern fullback; he’s become the cornerstone of PSG’s project. Is this the revenge of a man who was perhaps underestimated when he shared the same flank with Mbappé? Arriving at PSG with the reputation of a “Real Madrid academy product” after a stint in Germany, Hakimi now seems to remind the Bernabéu of the strategic mistake they made letting him go. Madrid sought the glitter of Mbappé but perhaps what they truly lacked was the solidity and loyalty of Achraf Hakimi. Modern football’s irony sometimes boils down to a single name, mispronounced at just the right time. While Kylian Mbappé had been hailed as the savior of Real Madrid after years of buildup, it is Achraf Hakimi, who stayed in Paris, who now stands out as one of Europe’s most influential players. Two opposite trajectories, two readings of the same summer of 2024, and perhaps an analytical error that may prove hard to correct. Mbappé chose the prestige of Madrid. He probably believed he could lift the European trophy more easily with the club that’s won it the most. He was likely tired of PSG’s repeated failures. Hakimi, on the other hand, chose continuity, stability, and a playing project that fully embraced him. Today, the stats and performances seem to vindicate the Moroccan. His influence goes beyond the pitch: he’s become a technical and mental leader, respected by the locker room, trusted by the coach, and adored by the fans. And what if it’s Hakimi who ends up lifting the trophy in 2025, with the very PSG that Mbappé once left with apparent disdain? For that to happen, Hakimi will need to shine again, this time against another English club, the same type that humiliated Mbappé, Ancelotti, Pérez, and all of Madrid. While Paris celebrates, in Madrid, doubt is creeping in. Did they pay too much for a player whose game depends almost entirely on individual bursts of brilliance? And above all, how do you make multiple stars of similar stature coexist without eroding the cohesion of a group that used to be united and solid? It would still be premature to write off Mbappé and his Spanish adventure—his raw talent remains undeniable. But this rough beginning raises an important question: what if the future of football no longer lies in glitz and glamour, but in game intelligence, versatility, and collective discipline? If that’s the case, Achraf Hakimi may already be one of its most complete symbols.