Think Forward.

Entre Gaza et l'IA il n' y a que quelques mots... 1433

La deuxième semaine de février aura vu des échanges d'otages israéliens contre des palestiniens. Les Hamsaouis étaient encore armés jusqu’aux dents. Les bombardements n’y ont pas fait grand-chose. Ça s'est passé sur fond de confirmation du pdt Trump de faire une Rivera de Gaza sans les palestiniens. le bluff devient une constante dans le langage du Président. Il dit être certain à 99% que l’Egypte et la Jordanie allaient accepter de les recevoir brandissant l’arme fatale du Dollars. Quand il reçut le Roi de Jordanie au bureau ovale, le moment était douloureux frôlant l’humiliation. Il a fallu toute la classe et le doigté du souverain hachémite pour finalement s’en sortir, le visage crispé et rouge d’une colère et d’une tristesse à peine voilée. Il fallait tenir bon et il l’a fait. Trump semble ignorer l’histoire et la géographie ou du moins ne les prend en considération. Attendons le sommet arabe le 27 février au Caire et les réactions de pays jusqu’ici silencieux ou dans l’expectative. Entre temps Hamas supplie les pays arabes de les aider allant jusqu’à reconnaitre que le 7 octobre était une erreur. Trump est vite passé à autre chose. Après les 19 minutes et 55 secondes accordées au Roi de Jordanie, voilà qu’il s’entretient longuement au téléphone avec le sieur Poutine pendant près d'une heure trente. Les deux hommes semblent sur la même longueur d’onde. Ils disent vouloir la paix rapidement en Ukraine. Les lendemains du trublion Zelensky semble comptés. Pour le principe les européens disent que la paix ne peut pas se faire sans eux. Ils n’ont n’en pas la puissance, divisés qu’ils sont. En parallèle l’autorité palestinienne ou ce qu’il en reste a remercié Sa Majesté le Roi Mohammed VI pour son intervention à fin que soit libéré à son profit, des fonds retenus par Israël. Ce qui se passe à Gaza a éclipsé le rendez-vous le plus important de ce début du mois : le fameux sommet parisien consacré à l’intelligence artificielle. La quasi-totalité des pays du monde était là. Certains représentés par leurs présidents comme l’Inde ou les Emirats. La Chine et les USA étaient représentés par leurs vice-présidents respectifs. C’est dire l’importance du sujet pour l’avenir de l’humanité entière. Certains veulent une équité, d’autres un équilibre et d’autres encore de la transparence et de l’éthique. Difficile à atteindre quand les grands de ce monde ne signent pas les résolutions finales et ne prennent aucun engagement contraignant leur domination et le développement technologique qui les sert en premier. 61 pays ont signé pour une IA ouverte, inclusive et éthique, pas les USA et le Royaume uni. En marge du sommet il y eu une réunion fort importante de l’instance dite Partenariat Mondiale de l’Intelligence Artificielle qui réunit à aujourd’hui une cinquantaine de pays. Il le fallait bien car nombreux sont les pays qui tapotent à la porte pour en faire partie dont le Maroc. La jeune instance a profité de l’occasion pour faire le point sur les axes de sa stratégie qu’elle cherche à mettre en conformité avec les recommandations de l’OCDE en matière d’IA. Si bon nombre de pays militent pour réduire au maximum les écarts entre les nations, il faut dire que c’est plutôt très mal parti pour les puristes et les naïfs. L’écart est déjà là avec les deux mastodontes que sont les USA et la Chine bien installé en tête. D’autres espèrent et font tout pour coller au peloton de tête notamment l’Inde et maintenant la France qui annonce vouloir investir 109 milliards de dollars en matière d’IA. Pour cela, elles s’allient aux Emirats arabes qui vont mettre 50 milliards et au Canada qui va injecter 20 milliards dans le projet. Le plus important et d’avoir ses propres centres de données. Les données étant le nerf de la guerre à ce niveau à côté bien évidemment des technologies. Le montant annoncé par la France reste tout de même bien loin du projet américain de 500 milliards. Nous sommes là sur une autre planète. Mais faut-il autant d’argent quand on apprend par ailleurs que DeepSeek développé par les chinois n’aurait couté que 6 millions USD. Ce que ne dit pas la Chine est qu'elle est partie de là où les américains étaient arrivés à coup d'investissements lourds en utilisant même des cartes INVIDIA mais de génération un peu ancienne tout de même. Pour se rendre compte des écarts existant, il faut savoir qu’en termes de Data centers il en existe 5381 aux USA contre 521 en Allemagne, 449 en Chine, 315 en France et seulement 219 au Japon à titre d’exemple. Les USA ont ainsi plus de 50% de la capacité mondiale de stockage des données contre 16% pour la Chine. L’Afrique est recensée dans le reste du monde, une quantité véritablement négligeable. Disposer de centres de données et de calcul est d'abord une affaire de volonté et de financement et aussi de capacité à produire de l’Energie et à disposer de quantité importante d’eau. Et oui, quand vous cliquez pour ouvrir un message WhatsApp ou quand vous en envoyer un ; quand vous faites une rechercher sur google, Brave ou autres ; quand vous regardez une vidéo sur YouTube ou un film sur Netflix, vous consommez de l’Energie pour faire tourner la machinerie qui va vous répondre mais aussi de l’eau car c’est l’eau qui la refroidit. La technologie et très énergivore et consomme beaucoup d’eau. Certains disent même que c’est la consommation excessive d’eau de la Silicon Valley qui expliquerait les récents incendies gigantesques de Californie. Si Le Maroc cherche à intégrer le PMIA, C’est qu’il ressent l’importance de ne pas être qu’un simple consommateur d’IA. Il veut avoir sa petite part et surtout se positionner pour ne pas être distancé. Le pays compte déjà des centres de calculs de taille respectable lui permettant d’ambitionner une efficacité dans la recherche scientifique et le traitement des besoins de ses citoyens. Ce n’est pas suffisant. L’IA est aujourd’hui partout dans notre quotidien et elle le sera davantage et de plus en plus. Le Maroc ambitionne de poursuivre sa transformation numérique et cherche une petite part en matière d’innovation technologique. C’est dire que nous aurons besoin de produire davantage d’Energie et pour se faire il faudrait peut-être tenir compte des limites des énergies renouvelables et leur cout et réfléchir sérieusement au nucléaire. C'est ce qui est prévu dans le projet américain. Nous ne devons pas être de simples consommateurs d'IA sinon nous allons importer les biais des autres et là nous serions simplement perdus.
open.luxeradio.ma/show/track/47f...
Aziz Daouda

Aziz Daouda

Directeur Technique et du Développement de la Confédération Africaine d'Athlétisme. Passionné du Maroc, passionné d'Afrique. Concerné par ce qui se passe, formulant mon point de vue quand j'en ai un. Humaniste, j'essaye de l'être, humain je veux l'être. Mon histoire est intimement liée à l'athlétisme marocain et mondial. J'ai eu le privilège de participer à la gloire de mon pays .


6200

33.0

Mauritania Facing Security, Diplomatic, and Geopolitical Recomposition Challenges in the Sahel.. 168

After four years of intervention, the Russian paramilitary group Wagner officially announced its withdrawal from Mali in June 2025. It had been active in the region since 2021. This departure occurs in a context marked by a resurgence of jihadist attacks weakening Malian and regional stability. Wagner’s departure does not signify a Russian disengagement, as its missions are being taken over by a new paramilitary organization, the Africa Corps, directly controlled by the Russian Ministry of Defense. This group, born after the failed coup attempt by former Wagner leaders in 2023, continues Russia’s strategy of influence in Africa, notably in what is declared to be the training of Malian forces to face the rising terrorist threats. This transition illustrates the complexity of the security context in the Sahel, where Wagner’s relative failure to stabilize Mali and contain Tuareg and jihadist armed groups forces Moscow to readjust its methods while maintaining its strategic influence. This new situation raises serious questions about the real capacity to contain terrorism in the region, especially at Mali’s border with Mauritania. Meanwhile, the Polisario Front, a separatist movement, is increasingly associated with terrorist activities. In Spain, a militant affiliated with the Polisario was arrested for preparing terrorist acts against Morocco, with evidence of incitement to jihadism and acquisition of explosive materials. This radicalization fits into a dynamic where the Polisario cooperates more closely with Islamist groups, notably benefiting from the support of Iran and its proxies including Hezbollah. Well-documented longstanding links exist between the Polisario and terrorist groups in the Sahel, such as the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara, whose founders were former Polisario fighters. This collusion manifests through logistical support, arms transfers, and increased militarization, including the use of suicide drones supplied by Iran. These facts reinforce the perception of the Polisario not only as a separatist actor but also as a vector of instability and terrorism in the region. At the same time, Morocco has recorded numerous diplomatic breakthroughs and growing international pressure to formalize Moroccan sovereignty over the Western Sahara provinces. In 2024, Morocco achieved several major victories in the international recognition of its sovereignty over its southern provinces. More than 116 countries, including powers like France, now support the Moroccan autonomy plan as the only viable solution to the conflict. This position was recently shared by the United Kingdom following the United States. Influential African countries such as Côte d'Ivoire and, more recently, Ghana have done the same. The fresh stance of Zuma’s party in South Africa further confirms this evolution. Morocco’s diplomatic progress relies on skilled international relations management and active engagement in regional security, notably in the Sahel. The Kingdom’s tact is evident as it avoids embarrassing its southern neighbor Mauritania, which has long recognized the so-called RASD puppet entity. It is also important to recall the U.S. intention to classify the Polisario Front as a terrorist organization, a measure supported by analyses documenting its links with Hezbollah, the PKK, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Cuba, Venezuela, and other states unfriendly to the U.S. This classification aims to reveal the true nature of the Polisario. In this context, Mauritania finds itself in turmoil. Things have moved too fast. The comfort it once enjoyed is gone. The conjunction of these developments forces the country’s authorities to rethink their political positioning. Faced with the recurring fragility caused by the Polisario, which hinders its development and threatens its stability, and observing Algeria’s inability to move beyond Boumediene’s legacy to ensure effective security, Mauritania is inevitably pushed toward rapprochement with Morocco. Morocco is perceived as the only actor capable of guaranteeing lasting security in the region, especially against rising terrorist threats and current geopolitical challenges. Some Mauritanian publications already address this question very directly. This shows that Mauritanian decision-makers are indeed embracing this paradigm shift. Recent movements by the Mauritanian army align with this trend, especially as some Polisario cadres no longer hesitate to threaten Mauritania, which they label as a traitor. This tension further complicates Mauritania’s capacity to secure its borders, a young country whose resources remain very limited given the vastness of its borders, notably with Mali and Algeria. In this environment, Algeria, a blind and staunch supporter of the Polisario, today appears more trapped in rhetoric without real capacity for action, which weakens its regional position. Mauritania seems to have understood this for some time, though perhaps not openly. Conversely, Morocco, strengthened by its diplomatic successes and proven commitment to counterterrorism, appears as an indispensable partner for Mauritania in its quest for stability and prosperity. It would therefore not be surprising to see Mauritania in the very near future withdraw its recognition of the so-called RASD puppet entity or at least move away from what it has so far called a positive neutrality. In fact, Mauritania has already distanced itself somewhat from the separatists, which does not please Algeria, which is losing influence. The withdrawal of Wagner from Mali, the radicalization of the Polisario which seems overwhelmed, Morocco’s diplomatic successes, and the likely imminent designation of the Polisario as a terrorist organization by the U.S. clearly redraw the geopolitical map of the Sahel and the Maghreb. Mauritania is probably preparing for this and even taking the lead. In this shifting context, it is pushed toward a natural strategic realignment with Morocco, the only actor capable of offering a credible security alternative against terrorist threats and development challenges. This repositioning marks a major step in the reshaping of regional alliances, with profound implications for the future stability of the Sahel and the reconfiguration of North Africa.

His Majesty King Mohammed VI: Heir to a Tradition, Architect of Sovereign Modernity 173

Long before the major transformations of the 1920s, Morocco experienced significant attempts at modernization under the reign of Hassan I (1873-1894). A visionary Sultan, Hassan I undertook reforms of the administration, strengthened the army, and developed infrastructure, notably roads and communications. His efforts encountered a conservative internal context, marked by resistance from the fouqahas (Islamic scholars) and elites attached to traditional structures. He also faced increasing pressure from European powers seeking to establish themselves in Morocco. These dual obstacles limited the scope of the reforms but nevertheless laid the foundations for gradual modernization. Before him, Sidi Mohammed ben Abdallah, an enlightened 18th-century Sultan, had already played a major role in opening Morocco to the world. He notably founded and developed the port of Essaouira (then Mogador) in 1765, conceived as a strategic commercial hub to control foreign trade. Thanks to its geographic position and infrastructure, Essaouira quickly became an essential crossroads for exchanges between Sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, and the Mediterranean, thereby strengthening the kingdom’s economic and diplomatic ties. Other sovereigns continued this dynamic. Moulay Abdelaziz (1894-1908) pursued certain military and administrative reforms despite increasing instability. Under the French protectorate, Moulay Youssef (1912-1927) had to navigate colonial domination while trying to preserve some Moroccan sovereignty. Ascending the throne in 1927 at only 19 years old, Mohammed V became a symbol of Moroccan resistance against the French protectorate. Rejecting colonial domination, he supported the nationalist movement, notably during his historic speech in Tangier in 1947, where he called for Moroccan unity and independence. Exiled from 1953 to 1955, his triumphant return marked the beginning of the end of the protectorate. In 1956, he proclaimed independence and laid the foundations of a sovereign Morocco. He then engaged in building a modern state by reforming institutions, unifying the territory, developing education, and initiating economic modernization, creating the Royal Armed Forces and other security bodies while affirming national cultural identity. Son of Mohammed V, Hassan II (1961-1999) consolidated the Moroccan state by establishing a constitutional monarchy and developing essential infrastructure. He skillfully combined tradition and modernity, strengthening national sovereignty while opening the country to foreign investment and international exchanges. Under his reign, Morocco made major advances in economic, social, and cultural fields, laying the groundwork for sustainable modernization and preparing the terrain for current transformations. Hassan II is remembered for gradually recovering the territorial integrity of the Kingdom in a difficult, even hostile, internal and international context. Under Mohammed VI, Morocco is undergoing a profound transformation, comparable in scale to that of the 1920s but within a sovereign and globalized context. His reign, marked by a clear vision and firm will, combines respect for traditions with openness to modernity. The country is investing massively in transport infrastructure: roads, high-speed trains, airports, and public and private facilities throughout the territory. Integration with Western economies has strengthened, making Morocco a preferred destination for foreign direct investment, attracting billions of dollars annually. Flagship projects, especially in preparation for the 2030 World Cup, are stimulating the development of sports, tourism, and cultural infrastructure, affirming the country’s international influence. At the same time, social and economic modernization is underway, with initiatives to improve education, health, innovation, and sustainable development, positioning Morocco within a global and modern dynamic. The country has simply tripled its GDP in less than twenty years. All this reflects continuity and renewal. Morocco is, in fact, in perpetual reinvention. The parallel between the major transformations of the 1920s and the era of Mohammed VI reveals a Morocco capable of constant reinvention. While the metamorphosis of the 1920s was dictated by a colonial context, today’s transformation is the fruit of a sovereign ambition, focused on balanced, inclusive, and sustainable development. It embodies the will of a sovereign with a multilateral vision. No domain is left aside or forgotten. The great projects of yesterday and today testify to an even stronger and more determined energy for transformation, with different goals: to move from a Morocco under tutelage, dependent and powerless in the face of circumstances, to a major player on the international stage, capable of attracting and cooperating with the world and building its future with confidence. Today, Morocco fits into a long tradition of historical metamorphoses. Each era has shaped a dynamic country, attempting modernity and ambitions, sometimes successful, sometimes aborted. Yet it has remained faithful to its millennial history and cultural heritage. Today it is rising, modernizing, and asserting itself as an emerging country on which one can rely. The Kingdom of Mohammed VI is thus ready to meet the challenges of the 21st century with boldness and determination, armed this time with institutions, clear and powerful visions and strategies. The royal will thus guides the country toward genuine development benefiting all, an indispensable geostrategic position, sustainable economic breakthroughs, a reliable political system, and truly irreversible progress.

The Greek Magical Papyri 261

The Greek Magical Papyri (Latin: Papyri Graecae Magicae, abbreviated PGM) represent one of the most important and enigmatic bodies of esoteric literature from the ancient world. Comprising a collection of spells, rituals, hymns, and invocations compiled between the 2nd century BCE and the 5th century CE, these papyri offer an extraordinary glimpse into the syncretic spiritual practices of Greco-Roman Egypt. Preserved mainly on fragile scrolls and manuscripts written in Greek (with occasional Coptic, Demotic, and even Hebrew terms), the PGM bridge the realms of religion, folk magic, and mystery traditions. They are not only historical artifacts but also bear witness to a time when the boundaries between magic, religion, and science were fluid and deeply interconnected. The texts were discovered primarily in Egypt, particularly in the city of Thebes, and made their way to European collections during the 19th century. They were finally compiled and published in the early 20th century, most notably by Karl Preisendanz, and later translated into English by scholars such as Hans Dieter Betz. The rituals recorded in the PGM range from practical spells—such as those for healing, protection, love, and curse-breaking—to theurgic operations intended to invoke divine beings and achieve ecstatic union with the cosmos. One of the most distinctive features of the Greek Magical Papyri is their religious syncretism. The practitioner calls upon gods and spirits from various traditions: Greek deities like Hermes, Hekate, and Apollo appear alongside Egyptian gods such as Thoth and Isis, and even Jewish and Gnostic elements—like references to Iao (YHWH) or archons—are present. This reflects the religious pluralism of Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, where practitioners saw divine power not as confined to one pantheon, but as accessible through many forms, names, and languages. In this sense, the papyri reflect a universalist approach to the sacred, a distinctive characteristic of late antiquity’s mystery cults and Hermeticism. The goals of the rituals varied widely. Some texts focus on personal gain—attracting lovers, gaining favor from rulers, or acquiring wealth. Others describe elaborate invocations of daemons or spirits, often accompanied by complex visualizations, sacred names (called voces magicae), and symbolic gestures. One famous category of these rituals is the “Headless Rite”, an invocation of a cosmic spirit that transcends the gods themselves. The magician declares mastery over heaven and earth and seeks personal transformation and empowerment through divine contact. This ritual later influenced Western ceremonial magic, especially in the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and Thelemic traditions. The PGM also contain magical alphabets, sigils, amulets, and magical words—often long, untranslatable sequences of syllables intended to carry vibrational power. These expressions may represent remnants of older oral traditions or attempts to imitate divine or non-human speech. The importance of divine names—often in long, hybrid strings—is central, reflecting the ancient belief that knowing the true name of a deity conferred control or communion with that entity. Rather than being fringe documents, the Greek Magical Papyri reveal that magic was integrated into daily life and spiritual aspiration in antiquity. Priests, philosophers, and laypersons alike sought access to divine power through these rites. Far from the later Christian demonization of magic, the practitioners of these texts viewed themselves as mystai—seekers of truth and harmony with the cosmos. In modern times, the PGM have become an essential source for scholars of religion, anthropology, and occultism. They offer direct insight into ancient ritual techniques, influencing contemporary esoteric traditions such as Hermeticism, Neopaganism, and Chaos Magic. Moreover, they have helped to reconstruct ancient mystery practices that had otherwise been lost to time. In conclusion, the Greek Magical Papyri stand as a testament to the richness, complexity, and spiritual depth of ancient magical traditions. They are not merely spells or superstitions, but part of a larger sacred worldview in which humanity, the gods, and the cosmos were intimately connected. In these texts, we hear the voices of ancient magicians calling out to the stars—not just for power, but for divine communion and wisdom.