Think Forward.

Législatives 2026 au Maroc : un défi démocratique sous impulsion royale... 2385

Sa Majesté le Roi Mohammed VI a officiellement chargé le ministère de l’Intérieur de préparer les élections législatives de 2026. Cette décision, annoncée dans le 26ᵉ discours du Trône, constitue à la fois une directive solennelle et une marque de confiance particulière envers ce ministère. Avant la fin de l’année, le ministère devra alors avoir finalisé le cadre juridique et organisationnel du scrutin. Dans la foulée, M. Abdelouafi Laftit a convoqué les principaux partis politiques à des consultations inclusives visant à garantir « une élection exemplaire », transparente et crédible, en conformité avec les instructions royales. Cette démarche témoigne d’une volonté claire de renforcer l’organisation des élections en l’éloignant de l’influence directe du gouvernement, notamment celle de son chef, M. Aziz Akhannouch, également président du RNI. Ce parti est perçu comme ayant une influence conséquente sur le processus électoral. Confier cette mission au ministère de l’Intérieur, reconnu pour son rôle d’arbitre institutionnel, vise à limiter les interférences politiques directes et à prévenir toute tentative de captation du scrutin par certains acteurs en place. Le ministre, lors de la réunion, a insisté sur la nécessité que les élections soient « exemplaires » et a laissé entendre qu’un effort significatif serait déployé pour répondre aux attentes démocratiques et institutionnelles, sous-entendu que tout sera mis en œuvre pour une implémentation stricte de la volonté royale, à distance de toutes les factions politiques. Un nouveau Code électoral spécifique à la Chambre des représentants est donc en préparation, avec une adoption envisagée avant la fin 2025. Les réflexions et discussions en cours portent sur plusieurs axes essentiels : la mise à jour ou la simplification des listes électorales, avec le recours à la seule carte d’identité pour identifier les électeurs ; la moralisation et la régulation du financement des campagnes par un contrôle renforcé, voire un plafonnement des dépenses des candidats et des partis. Une meilleure transparence ainsi que la révision du découpage électoral fondée sur le dernier recensement sont également à l’ordre du jour. La question du nombre de bureaux de vote, qui dépassait 40 000 lors du dernier scrutin, devrait aussi être abordée, tout comme la représentation des quelque 6 millions de Marocains résidant à l’étranger. Le mode de scrutin actuel, basé sur la proportionnelle par listes, pourrait aussi être remis en question afin de remédier aux insuffisances constatées en 2021, notamment la propension à favoriser les «faiseurs» de députés et les clientélismes locaux, souvent nourris par l’argent. Dans la sphère politique, c’est plutôt silence radio. L’impression est que les partis politiques sont soit blasés, soit simplement stratégiquement attentifs. C’est donc chez les chroniqueurs et autres auteurs que se déroule le débat et foisonnent les idées. Le sentiment, tout de même partagé, est que les choses doivent changer si l’on veut redonner un sens à la vie politique. C’est ce que veut Sa Majesté. L’introduction d’un scrutin uninominal à deux tours est l’une des idées qui ressort souvent comme une piste possible pour réduire l’emprise de l’argent et des réseaux traditionnels d'influence. Ce mode de scrutin, jamais expérimenté au Maroc, favoriserait un vote davantage axé sur les individus plutôt que sur les listes de partis, renforçant ainsi la démocratie par une meilleure mobilisation citoyenne et une représentativité accrue. Jusqu’ici, les citoyens ont souvent été surpris par des alliances contre nature formées après le scrutin, dès lors que l’électeur n’a plus d’emprise sur la configuration finale. Le scrutin à deux tours a pour avantage que toute négociation ou alliance entre partis se fait entre les deux tours, donc à un moment où le citoyen peut encore intervenir par un second vote. Cette réforme électorale de fond pourrait répondre à un défi majeur : le désintérêt des citoyens pour la politique, manifesté par des taux élevés d’abstention, phénomène alimenté par une perception d’un renouvellement insuffisant, d’une faible efficacité des partis et, partant, des instances élues. Pour réussir, la réforme doit aller de pair avec un effort des partis pour renouveler leurs approches, attirer une jeunesse en quête d’alternatives et raviver l’intérêt populaire pour le vote. Les partis politiques marocains ont historiquement une relation ambiguë avec les électeurs en dehors de leurs bases traditionnelles acquises. Il semble même qu’ils découragent l’adhésion massive au processus électoral, de peur que leurs effectifs, souvent anecdotiques par rapport à la masse électorale statutaire, ne soient dilués. Le PJD a pris les rênes du pays avec seulement 1,3 million de voix, soit environ un dixième du nombre d’électeurs potentiels. Certains partis disposent de groupes parlementaires alors qu’ils n’ont obtenu que quelques 200 000 voix, voire moins. Les partis sont parfois perçus comme peu représentatifs et entachés d’accusations de corruption. Ils ont néanmoins un intérêt pragmatique à mobiliser leurs noyaux d’électeurs pour conserver leur poids politique et leur financement public. La perspective d’une campagne électorale dynamique semble aujourd’hui limitée par une certaine apathie des acteurs politiques, freinant l’élan démocratique attendu. Concernant le scrutin uninominal à deux tours, bien qu’il puisse structurer le paysage politique autour de deux grands pôles et favoriser des alliances plus claires, il ne saurait à lui seul neutraliser les influences de l’argent, les réseaux liés aux chefs communaux ou les clientélismes. Ce système peut même accentuer une bipolarisation artificielle, marginaliser les petits partis et laisser perdurer des alliances occultes entre grands partis, nuisant à la transparence et à la légitimité démocratique. Par ailleurs, des risques subsistent concernant la baisse de la participation entre les deux tours et la complexité du changement d’opinions des électeurs, pouvant ouvrir la voie à des manipulations stratégiques. Ainsi, des réformes complémentaires sont indispensables, notamment en matière de transparence du financement des campagnes, de moralisation du processus électoral et de contrôle des clientélismes locaux, pour garantir une compétition politique plus juste et plus crédible. La décision royale de confier au ministère de l’Intérieur la gestion du scrutin, le dialogue inclusif avec les partis, et la volonté affichée de moraliser le processus témoignent d’une ambition forte de réforme profonde pour une élection plus juste, équitable et digne de confiance. Le mode de scrutin reste au cœur des débats, mais la réussite des législatives de 2026 dépendra aussi de la capacité à réinventer un système électoral et politique capable de mobiliser les citoyens et d’instaurer la confiance dans la démocratie marocaine. Les citoyens aussi, sont appelés a davantage d'honnêteté et de responsabilité.
Aziz Daouda Aziz Daouda

Aziz Daouda

Directeur Technique et du Développement de la Confédération Africaine d'Athlétisme. Passionné du Maroc, passionné d'Afrique. Concerné par ce qui se passe, formulant mon point de vue quand j'en ai un. Humaniste, j'essaye de l'être, humain je veux l'être. Mon histoire est intimement liée à l'athlétisme marocain et mondial. J'ai eu le privilège de participer à la gloire de mon pays .


8900

33.0

Christopher Ross or Diplomacy Against the Current 63

It sometimes happens that diplomats, once their mission is complete, opt for the discretion demanded by their former status. Others prefer to continue intervening in debates they themselves helped complicate. Christopher Ross clearly belongs to this second category. In a recent article, the former envoy for the Moroccan Sahara has once again taken a stance on this sensitive issue. With the benefit of hindsight, his analysis has gained neither nuance nor critical distance. Reading his text suggests quite the opposite: the same interpretive framework, the same assumptions, and above all, the same indulgence toward Algiers. This persistence raises a fundamental question: what is Ross seeking today by intervening again in a dossier where he was one of the most contested mediators? Appointed in 2009 by Ban Ki-moon, he succeeded a series of envoys who had faced the same difficulty: breaking out of a diplomatic impasse inherited from the Cold War. This conflict indeed traces its roots to the geopolitical upheavals of the 1970s. Morocco consolidated its historical sovereignty over the region in 1975, prompting Spain's withdrawal, while the Polisario, backed politically, financially, and militarily by Algeria and Libya, claimed the creation of an independent state. The dossier took on an international dimension with the creation, in 1991, of the MINURSO, tasked with supervising a referendum; an idea proposed by the late Hassan II in a speech delivered in Nairobi at an OAU summit. Very quickly, the obstacles created by the Polisario, particularly regarding voter identification, made this project nearly impossible, and the process stalled. It was then that Morocco proposed, in 2007, a major political initiative: a plan for broad autonomy for the southern provinces under Moroccan sovereignty. The project was presented to the Security Council as a realistic and pragmatic solution and garnered growing international support, described as "serious and credible" in several resolutions. It marked a true turning point in diplomatic realism. Since then, the diplomatic landscape around the Sahara has profoundly evolved. Numerous states now view Morocco's autonomy plan as the most credible basis for a lasting political solution. In 2020, the Trump administration officially announced recognition of Morocco's sovereignty over the Sahara, a major turning point in the dossier's diplomatic balance. In its wake, several Western powers reaffirmed their support for the autonomy plan, while Arab, European, and African countries opened consulates in Laâyoune or Dakhla, de facto recognizing Moroccan administration of the territory. Within the UN, the terminology used in Security Council resolutions has also evolved: the notion of a "realistic, pragmatic, and durable political solution" has become the guiding principle of the process. This shift toward a pragmatic approach reflects a simple reality: the referendum envisioned in the 1990s is no longer seen as a viable option. It is precisely this diplomatic turning point that Ross, still prisoner to an outdated vision, seems to refuse to integrate. In his recent statements, he continues to defend an interpretation of the conflict harking back to a bygone era, clinging to diplomatic frameworks long surpassed by geopolitical realities. This stance even calls into question the man's integrity. During his tenure, the Kingdom had already expressed serious reservations about his impartiality and officially demanded his replacement in 2012, as trust had been gravely undermined. A mediator, by definition, must maintain equitable distance between the parties. When that distance vanishes, mediation loses its credibility. In fact, Ross never truly dispelled suspicions of closeness to the Algerian position. Algeria's role in this conflict is central. One of the most controversial points in his discourse concerns precisely Algiers' place in the dossier. For fifty years, Algeria has officially claimed to be merely an "observing country" in this conflict. The diplomatic and strategic reality is entirely different. Algiers hosts, arms, and finances the Polisario, and shelters thousands of refugees in Tindouf, a significant portion of whom are not even from the territory in question. There is little doubt that the conflict is primarily a dispute pitting Algeria against Morocco, an analysis now widely shared by the main international actors. No lasting solution can emerge without Algiers' direct involvement in the negotiations. In this context, Ross's repeated positions appear anachronistic and undermine his credibility. By continuing, in effect, to align with Algeria and the Polisario, he gives the impression of prolonging a political fight rather than illuminating the debate. The responsibility of former international mediators is thus in question. When a former UN representative speaks out so trenchantly in public, he indirectly engages the image of the institution he served. Yet the credibility of international diplomacy rests precisely on the neutrality of its intermediaries. The diplomatic history of the Sahara is dotted with mediation attempts, successive plans, and failed initiatives. Before Ross, other envoys had tried to unblock the situation, notably James Baker, who proposed a transition plan in the early 2000s that was ultimately rejected. Each attempt has recalled a fundamental truth: without regional political will, no framework can succeed. This is precisely why current international diplomacy favors a realistic solution based on autonomy and regional cooperation, rather than maximalist constructs inherited from the Cold War. In essence, the question is not whether Ross has the right to express an opinion. Like any former diplomat, he can, of course, participate in the debate. But when he persists in defending a vision that ignores major geopolitical shifts, his discourse takes on the appearance of a rearguard battle. The world has changed, as have regional balances. The Sahara under Moroccan sovereignty is no longer merely a decolonization issue: it now lies at the heart of a strategic reconfiguration of the Atlantic and North Africa. Faced with these transformations, international diplomacy seems to have chosen pragmatism. Christopher Ross, by contrast, appears to have chosen nostalgia for a bygone paradigm. In international affairs, history shows that those who cling to past paradigms almost always end up swimming against the current of present realities.

Paradoxical Ramadan: Piety, Irritability, Overconsumption and Slumping Productivity... 872

Every year, Ramadan settles in Morocco as a form of collective breathing space. Daily rhythms change or are inverted, habits are reorganized or fall apart, nights come alive and days slow down. A sacred month par excellence, it is first and foremost a time of fasting, contemplation, piety and solidarity. But it is also, increasingly, a national paradox: intense spiritual fervor coexists with heightened social irritability, massive food waste and a noticeable drop in productivity. Ramadan, as it is prescribed and recommended, is a time of inner discipline. Fasting is not just abstaining from food; it is self‑control, restraint, patience. Religious scholars and schoolteachers insist on the moral dimension of fasting: refraining from anger, insults and injustice. In short, putting aside all forms of deceitfulness. Yet in contemporary Moroccan reality, the holy month sometimes seems to produce the opposite effect. It becomes the month of unjustified social tension. In large cities such as Casablanca, Rabat or Marrakech, if the mornings are relatively calm, late afternoon turns into a critical moment. Traffic is saturated, impatience is palpable, and road altercations become more frequent. Emergency services and police stations traditionally observe an increase in minor conflicts and aggressive behavior at the end of the day. There is also a rise in cases handled by gastro‑enterology and other specialties… People eat too much, and poorly. Fasting, combined with lack of sleep due to long evenings after iftar and waking up for suhoor, among other things, affects physiological balance. Irritability, reduced concentration and chronic fatigue become commonplace. In a country where emotional regulation is already under strain in everyday life, Ramadan acts as an amplifier. This nervousness is by no means a religious inevitability; it is a sociological consequence of how the month is organized, in a way that has gradually drifted away from its original spirit of moderation, self‑mastery and day‑and‑night contemplation. The immediate consequence is a slump in productivity. On the economic front, the impact is tangible. Administrative working hours are reduced, offices empty out in the afternoon without valid reasons, and construction sites run in slow motion. In some sectors, the drop in activity is accepted; in others, it causes structural delays. Ramadan excuses and explains everything. People shift the burden of their disengagement onto the community without the slightest embarrassment. Morocco aspires to accelerate its growth, attract investment and improve its competitiveness. Yet for nearly one month every year, the economy runs in degraded mode. The private sector adapts, but at what cost? The drop in productivity is not only quantitative; it is also qualitative: decisions are postponed, meetings cut short, projects delayed. The public administration and its staff amplify all this. It would be caricatural to place the blame on religion. The problem is not Ramadan; it is the absence of a culture of performance that is compatible with spiritual requirements. Output and accountability ought to be part of the values of the holy month. Another major contradiction is the paradox of food waste. While fasting is supposed to remind us of the hunger of the poorest, iftar tables are overloaded. Multiple soups, an abundance of pastries, redundant dishes. Markets are booming, food spending rises sharply, and a significant part of what is bought ends up in the trash. Wallets empty out and suffer. This phenomenon reveals a cultural transformation that may be surprising: Ramadan has partly become a social and consumerist event. Large retailers post their best figures, advertising intensifies, and TV channels compete with special programming to capture a deliberately captive nocturnal audience. At the start of the month, national channels record more than 70% of total viewership, a share they are far from reaching under normal circumstances, as Moroccans are very fond of foreign channels. The month of frugality paradoxically turns into a month of overconsumption. One can then ask: is this authentic spirituality, or a social ritualization? It would be unfair to reduce Moroccan Ramadan to its excesses. Thousands of solidarity initiatives emerge. Associations, mosques and volunteers distribute meals and aid to the most vulnerable. Families come together, intergenerational ties are strengthened. The mosque regains a vibrant centrality. The issue, therefore, is not to criticize Ramadan, but to question its contemporary practice. Are we faithful to its spirit, or prisoners of cultural habits that distort its meaning? If the holy month becomes synonymous with chronic fatigue, road rage, weakened productivity and waste, then there is a gap between the spiritual principle and its social translation. It is certainly time to advocate for a Ramadan of responsibility. A calm national debate is needed: how can we reconcile spiritual requirements with collective performance? How can we preserve the sacredness of the month while maintaining the efficiency of institutions? How can we turn fasting into a lever for self‑discipline rather than a pretext for slackness? Ramadan could be a laboratory for positive transformation: learning self‑control, optimizing time, rationalizing consumption, structuring solidarity. It could become a month of moral and professional excellence. Morocco, a country of deep religious tradition and clear economic ambition, has every interest in taking up this challenge. Because beyond productivity statistics or scenes of urban irritation, the real question is this: are we turning Ramadan into a simple collective ritual, or into a genuine exercise in inner and social reform? The answer, each year, is played out in the streets, offices and homes, and above all in each person’s conscience. We have a little less than two weeks left to think about it… seriously.